Gurobi 5.0.1 (linux64) logging started Wed Apr 24 08:51:49 2013 Optimize a model with 95254 rows, 94284 columns and 376554 nonzeros Presolve removed 97 rows and 0 columns Presolve time: 0.47s Presolved: 95157 rows, 94284 columns, 376457 nonzeros Variable types: 94187 continuous, 97 integer (97 binary) Root simplex log... Iteration Objective Primal Inf. Dual Inf. Time 9351 8.0867770e+04 6.060355e+04 0.000000e+00 5s 10917 8.1966435e+04 1.734201e+05 0.000000e+00 10s 12483 8.2382399e+04 1.158721e+01 0.000000e+00 15s 12598 8.2384360e+04 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 15s Root relaxation: objective 8.238436e+04, 12598 iterations, 15.48 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 82384.3599 0 71 - 82384.3599 - - 16s H 0 0 148943.00000 82384.3599 44.7% - 28s H 0 0 133188.00000 82384.3599 38.1% - 91s 0 0 107678.649 0 22 133188.000 107678.649 19.2% - 123s 0 0 117162.265 0 13 133188.000 117162.265 12.0% - 135s 0 0 120161.768 0 6 133188.000 120161.768 9.78% - 139s 0 0 120338.783 0 4 133188.000 120338.783 9.65% - 140s H 0 0 126766.41569 120338.783 5.07% - 140s H 0 0 125343.00000 120338.783 3.99% - 140s H 0 0 121198.00000 120338.783 0.71% - 140s 0 2 120339.666 0 4 121198.000 120339.666 0.71% - 143s H 2 2 121009.28205 120393.152 0.51% 225 144s 6 8 120414.870 5 2 121009.282 120410.769 0.49% 178 145s H 10 10 120674.00000 120410.769 0.22% 157 146s H 11 10 120668.00000 120410.769 0.21% 145 146s 24 12 120502.059 23 1 120668.000 120410.769 0.21% 157 150s H 44 15 120633.00000 120414.483 0.18% 153 154s 52 23 120599.927 16 1 120633.000 120414.483 0.18% 146 155s H 54 15 120589.00000 120414.483 0.14% 142 155s * 69 14 10 120554.00000 120422.423 0.11% 154 157s 93 26 120457.437 7 1 120554.000 120423.117 0.11% 142 160s H 94 17 120529.00000 120423.117 0.09% 141 160s * 99 6 7 120483.00000 120423.117 0.05% 140 160s * 116 1 13 120470.00000 120467.000 0.00% 132 161s Cutting planes: Implied bound: 97 Explored 117 nodes (50029 simplex iterations) in 161.87 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 1.204700000000e+05, best bound 1.204670000000e+05, gap 0.0025%