current theta: 0.687115543127 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 22:43:55 2014 Optimize a model with 16257 rows, 16383 columns and 48641 nonzeros Presolve removed 4430 rows and 4430 columns Presolve time: 0.25s Presolved: 11827 rows, 11953 columns, 35351 nonzeros Variable types: 0 continuous, 11953 integer (11953 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 858 iterations, 0.01 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (858 simplex iterations) in 0.27 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [13, 34, 56, 60, 79, 85, 90, 103, 112, 119, 121, 124, 125] edges [(76, 124), (98, 125), (115, 124), (119, 85), (106, 125), (18, 85), (41, 121), (83, 125), (39, 125), (1, 121), (90, 85), (71, 125), (33, 125), (16, 124), (49, 85), (46, 85), (5, 124), (15, 121), (70, 85), (31, 124), (85, 119), (40, 85), (122, 121), (3, 125), (20, 124), (34, 125), (100, 125), (51, 124), (55, 85), (48, 85), (68, 124), (125, 125), (8, 125), (107, 124), (86, 124), (35, 124), (19, 124), (110, 121), (9, 125), (117, 85), (14, 124), (44, 85), (91, 124), (67, 121), (26, 124), (65, 124), (37, 124), (104, 125), (84, 85), (89, 124), (7, 121), (72, 124), (75, 85), (4, 121), (96, 121), (111, 124), (80, 85), (74, 85), (58, 121), (78, 124), (53, 85), (121, 121), (11, 124), (38, 124), (0, 125), (61, 85), (50, 125), (66, 85), (81, 124), (28, 125), (114, 125), (120, 124), (22, 119), (63, 124), (82, 121), (102, 124), (99, 125), (60, 124), (108, 125), (101, 79), (10, 121), (118, 121), (64, 125), (2, 85), (21, 125), (12, 121), (6, 124), (93, 121), (126, 121), (94, 121), (103, 124), (45, 121), (116, 85), (32, 125), (42, 125), (29, 125), (79, 85), (77, 124), (47, 124), (59, 125), (57, 125), (62, 121), (88, 125), (109, 121), (24, 121), (43, 85), (87, 85), (123, 124), (17, 121), (52, 121), (56, 124), (113, 125), (92, 85), (23, 124), (73, 121), (112, 125), (124, 124), (36, 85), (105, 85), (13, 124), (27, 124), (95, 85), (97, 125), (69, 124), (25, 124), (54, 121), (30, 125)] current theta: 0.343557771563 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 22:43:55 2014 Optimize a model with 16257 rows, 16383 columns and 48641 nonzeros Presolve removed 11704 rows and 11704 columns Presolve time: 0.11s Presolved: 4553 rows, 4679 columns, 13529 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 4679 integer (4679 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1011 iterations, 0.03 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2096 simplex iterations) in 0.17 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [0, 49, 56, 68, 74, 79, 81, 88, 93, 109, 111, 119, 125] edges [(58, 81), (9, 88), (47, 81), (4, 111), (92, 79), (118, 109), (14, 68), (40, 119), (11, 111), (105, 88), (25, 81), (96, 68), (72, 88), (93, 93), (5, 81), (65, 111), (36, 119), (89, 68), (3, 68), (73, 119), (20, 0), (95, 79), (27, 111), (49, 119), (46, 119), (125, 125), (53, 119), (109, 81), (74, 79), (81, 81), (31, 111), (116, 119), (107, 68), (44, 119), (18, 79), (86, 81), (67, 119), (99, 88), (114, 88), (98, 81), (102, 68), (91, 0), (66, 119), (108, 81), (23, 111), (97, 88), (62, 81), (57, 0), (12, 119), (39, 0), (63, 93), (122, 111), (43, 88), (106, 88), (24, 111), (69, 111), (34, 81), (121, 93), (51, 68), (13, 0), (50, 88), (104, 81), (2, 119), (103, 125), (48, 49), (79, 79), (111, 81), (113, 88), (22, 119), (0, 0), (42, 0), (61, 119), (82, 93), (71, 0), (6, 81), (101, 93), (38, 49), (8, 0), (1, 93), (55, 119), (26, 88), (59, 88), (76, 111), (87, 88), (29, 119), (115, 81), (85, 79), (100, 0), (32, 125), (75, 49), (90, 79), (78, 68), (10, 119), (88, 88), (126, 119), (123, 125), (41, 109), (84, 88), (19, 0), (80, 79), (83, 88), (16, 111), (28, 88), (110, 81), (15, 119), (60, 125), (52, 93), (7, 81), (45, 68), (56, 125), (120, 68), (21, 119), (112, 125), (37, 109), (35, 0), (68, 111), (33, 88), (70, 119), (77, 111), (117, 79), (64, 81), (30, 0), (119, 119), (54, 68), (17, 93), (124, 88), (94, 93)] current theta: 0.171778885782 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 22:43:56 2014 Optimize a model with 16257 rows, 16383 columns and 48641 nonzeros Presolve removed 14718 rows and 14756 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1539 rows, 1627 columns, 4451 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1627 integer (1627 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1783 iterations, 0.04 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1783 simplex iterations) in 0.07 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.257668328672 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 22:43:56 2014 Optimize a model with 16257 rows, 16383 columns and 48641 nonzeros Presolve removed 13458 rows and 13460 columns Presolve time: 0.05s Presolved: 2799 rows, 2923 columns, 8265 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2923 integer (2923 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1577 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2789 simplex iterations) in 0.14 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [20, 50, 57, 69, 79, 82, 84, 89, 92, 120, 122, 124, 125] edges [(57, 50), (44, 92), (34, 57), (39, 50), (86, 122), (14, 122), (118, 122), (37, 122), (122, 122), (53, 79), (111, 69), (83, 124), (59, 84), (51, 122), (70, 84), (80, 92), (25, 120), (69, 120), (27, 120), (104, 84), (36, 92), (49, 84), (110, 122), (95, 79), (3, 57), (5, 122), (2, 89), (125, 125), (55, 84), (74, 79), (20, 120), (78, 122), (92, 92), (102, 122), (16, 20), (19, 124), (18, 79), (29, 84), (9, 125), (71, 120), (8, 50), (15, 122), (1, 122), (47, 122), (67, 82), (107, 69), (58, 122), (63, 82), (84, 84), (26, 124), (45, 82), (100, 50), (23, 69), (11, 122), (40, 92), (126, 122), (99, 84), (0, 120), (77, 50), (121, 122), (68, 122), (75, 84), (116, 92), (10, 82), (82, 122), (91, 120), (103, 125), (73, 82), (66, 84), (81, 89), (7, 122), (33, 84), (64, 50), (79, 79), (101, 82), (30, 57), (61, 84), (120, 120), (114, 125), (48, 79), (94, 122), (38, 92), (96, 82), (17, 82), (117, 92), (31, 50), (21, 89), (109, 69), (22, 92), (85, 79), (62, 92), (52, 82), (32, 125), (12, 92), (90, 79), (65, 50), (13, 20), (76, 69), (24, 120), (46, 79), (123, 125), (119, 92), (42, 50), (35, 120), (4, 69), (106, 84), (113, 125), (98, 92), (60, 125), (43, 84), (87, 84), (56, 125), (41, 82), (112, 125), (6, 89), (124, 124), (89, 50), (105, 84), (88, 57), (115, 122), (28, 84), (108, 89), (97, 84), (50, 57), (93, 82), (72, 57), (54, 69)] current theta: 0.214723607227 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 22:43:56 2014 Optimize a model with 16257 rows, 16383 columns and 48641 nonzeros Presolve removed 14168 rows and 14182 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 2089 rows, 2201 columns, 6123 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2201 integer (2201 binary) Root relaxation: objective -7.105427e-15, 1592 iterations, 0.04 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 -0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2897 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [13, 22, 34, 54, 55, 100, 102, 103, 108, 120, 121, 125, 126] edges [(71, 100), (13, 13), (74, 22), (6, 126), (86, 126), (41, 121), (76, 54), (56, 103), (42, 120), (115, 126), (1, 121), (103, 103), (53, 22), (25, 120), (99, 55), (88, 34), (69, 120), (27, 120), (81, 108), (21, 108), (39, 120), (79, 22), (92, 22), (109, 54), (65, 120), (4, 54), (70, 108), (60, 103), (10, 126), (5, 120), (9, 125), (15, 102), (43, 103), (90, 22), (124, 100), (29, 108), (84, 55), (110, 54), (11, 120), (12, 126), (87, 55), (85, 22), (73, 102), (117, 55), (102, 102), (51, 102), (26, 125), (19, 100), (7, 121), (98, 108), (104, 108), (57, 34), (101, 126), (0, 120), (96, 121), (100, 100), (58, 121), (121, 121), (83, 34), (66, 108), (40, 22), (32, 103), (78, 102), (106, 103), (97, 108), (22, 22), (111, 54), (48, 22), (120, 120), (118, 126), (44, 55), (107, 120), (114, 125), (82, 121), (67, 126), (31, 120), (91, 100), (54, 54), (34, 34), (113, 103), (18, 22), (45, 126), (50, 120), (122, 126), (20, 100), (63, 126), (36, 126), (38, 126), (93, 121), (72, 100), (94, 121), (68, 54), (119, 126), (46, 22), (30, 34), (116, 126), (47, 120), (24, 120), (123, 125), (80, 22), (2, 126), (126, 126), (8, 120), (55, 55), (17, 121), (52, 121), (64, 120), (61, 108), (125, 103), (16, 120), (62, 126), (108, 108), (14, 108), (112, 125), (49, 55), (77, 120), (37, 126), (23, 54), (33, 55), (95, 55), (28, 108), (75, 55), (35, 100), (89, 126), (3, 100), (59, 55), (105, 55)] current theta: 0.193251246504 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 22:43:56 2014 Optimize a model with 16257 rows, 16383 columns and 48641 nonzeros Presolve removed 14488 rows and 14515 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1769 rows, 1868 columns, 5150 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1868 integer (1868 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1394 iterations, 0.03 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2634 simplex iterations) in 0.09 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [18, 20, 34, 41, 64, 72, 73, 98, 99, 107, 111, 116, 123] edges [(114, 123), (36, 116), (12, 116), (91, 20), (27, 107), (47, 107), (4, 111), (11, 64), (9, 123), (75, 99), (67, 73), (23, 107), (107, 111), (63, 73), (105, 99), (31, 107), (88, 34), (65, 111), (43, 99), (109, 111), (108, 98), (74, 18), (32, 123), (84, 99), (111, 111), (58, 41), (8, 20), (61, 98), (121, 41), (14, 64), (77, 20), (53, 18), (95, 18), (38, 98), (125, 123), (24, 107), (0, 20), (79, 18), (82, 73), (41, 41), (29, 99), (70, 99), (19, 72), (73, 73), (22, 18), (86, 73), (48, 18), (57, 34), (39, 64), (90, 18), (69, 111), (112, 123), (33, 99), (26, 123), (1, 41), (104, 98), (83, 34), (35, 20), (28, 99), (54, 111), (85, 18), (6, 98), (116, 116), (92, 116), (124, 72), (115, 73), (37, 73), (106, 99), (25, 107), (97, 99), (52, 41), (93, 41), (46, 18), (59, 99), (62, 116), (51, 73), (17, 41), (94, 41), (20, 20), (78, 64), (87, 99), (126, 73), (113, 123), (34, 34), (99, 99), (80, 18), (16, 107), (49, 98), (7, 41), (55, 99), (45, 73), (72, 72), (60, 123), (96, 73), (123, 123), (2, 116), (100, 72), (117, 18), (30, 34), (50, 34), (5, 107), (13, 20), (110, 111), (15, 73), (98, 98), (18, 18), (122, 73), (103, 123), (56, 123), (118, 73), (40, 116), (44, 18), (76, 107), (66, 98), (42, 20), (71, 20), (89, 98), (102, 73), (68, 111), (21, 98), (81, 64), (119, 116), (101, 73), (64, 34), (10, 116), (3, 64), (120, 107)] current theta: 0.182515066143 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 22:43:56 2014 Optimize a model with 16257 rows, 16383 columns and 48641 nonzeros Presolve removed 14608 rows and 14641 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1649 rows, 1742 columns, 4786 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1742 integer (1742 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1722 iterations, 0.04 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1722 simplex iterations) in 0.07 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.187883156324 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 22:43:56 2014 Optimize a model with 16257 rows, 16383 columns and 48641 nonzeros Presolve removed 14544 rows and 14575 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1713 rows, 1808 columns, 4978 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1808 integer (1808 binary) Root relaxation: objective -7.105427e-15, 1752 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 -0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2739 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [19, 20, 50, 53, 58, 98, 99, 107, 109, 112, 113, 119, 122] edges [(53, 53), (57, 50), (38, 119), (1, 58), (3, 50), (91, 20), (39, 50), (86, 122), (27, 107), (111, 107), (109, 58), (75, 99), (40, 119), (118, 122), (37, 122), (23, 107), (93, 58), (122, 58), (51, 122), (105, 99), (31, 107), (36, 119), (30, 50), (43, 99), (50, 50), (108, 98), (61, 99), (52, 58), (107, 107), (84, 99), (14, 50), (34, 50), (8, 20), (26, 112), (47, 50), (78, 122), (90, 53), (102, 122), (116, 119), (100, 19), (67, 119), (74, 53), (24, 107), (0, 20), (15, 122), (29, 99), (58, 122), (88, 113), (70, 99), (12, 119), (77, 107), (11, 50), (56, 112), (19, 19), (68, 122), (117, 53), (33, 99), (96, 122), (104, 98), (35, 20), (28, 99), (2, 119), (44, 53), (45, 122), (7, 122), (64, 50), (85, 53), (112, 112), (65, 107), (25, 107), (54, 109), (97, 99), (62, 119), (59, 99), (124, 19), (18, 53), (69, 107), (20, 20), (80, 53), (87, 99), (72, 19), (99, 99), (83, 113), (16, 107), (49, 98), (48, 53), (55, 99), (125, 112), (41, 58), (121, 58), (5, 107), (13, 20), (10, 119), (98, 98), (126, 119), (6, 119), (82, 58), (63, 122), (60, 112), (22, 53), (110, 109), (76, 107), (95, 53), (81, 122), (42, 20), (103, 113), (32, 113), (9, 112), (66, 99), (71, 20), (101, 58), (94, 58), (4, 107), (79, 53), (89, 98), (21, 98), (73, 122), (114, 112), (115, 122), (119, 119), (123, 112), (17, 58), (113, 113), (46, 53), (106, 113), (92, 53), (120, 107)] current theta: 0.185199111233 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 22:43:56 2014 Optimize a model with 16257 rows, 16383 columns and 48641 nonzeros Presolve removed 14570 rows and 14601 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1687 rows, 1782 columns, 4902 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1782 integer (1782 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1578 iterations, 0.04 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1578 simplex iterations) in 0.07 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.186541133778 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 22:43:57 2014 Optimize a model with 16257 rows, 16383 columns and 48641 nonzeros Presolve removed 14558 rows and 14589 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1699 rows, 1794 columns, 4938 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1794 integer (1794 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1546 iterations, 0.04 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1546 simplex iterations) in 0.07 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.187212145051 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 22:43:57 2014 Optimize a model with 16257 rows, 16383 columns and 48641 nonzeros Presolve removed 14550 rows and 14581 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1707 rows, 1802 columns, 4960 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1802 integer (1802 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1589 iterations, 0.04 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2649 simplex iterations) in 0.09 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [16, 20, 34, 53, 54, 66, 78, 99, 119, 121, 123, 124, 126] edges [(53, 53), (114, 123), (120, 16), (100, 20), (91, 20), (6, 126), (41, 121), (76, 54), (47, 78), (75, 99), (40, 119), (73, 126), (1, 121), (16, 16), (105, 99), (88, 34), (36, 119), (43, 99), (61, 99), (104, 66), (32, 123), (84, 99), (8, 20), (77, 20), (109, 54), (38, 66), (4, 54), (90, 53), (116, 119), (19, 124), (122, 78), (64, 78), (67, 119), (74, 53), (125, 123), (0, 20), (9, 124), (24, 16), (110, 54), (29, 99), (70, 99), (12, 119), (7, 121), (72, 124), (57, 34), (101, 126), (27, 16), (96, 121), (86, 78), (99, 66), (37, 78), (112, 123), (117, 53), (58, 121), (33, 99), (26, 123), (121, 121), (83, 34), (35, 20), (28, 99), (2, 119), (44, 53), (49, 66), (85, 53), (106, 99), (111, 54), (97, 99), (62, 119), (118, 126), (59, 99), (18, 53), (82, 121), (20, 20), (80, 53), (3, 34), (87, 99), (25, 54), (113, 123), (98, 66), (54, 54), (81, 78), (34, 34), (45, 126), (14, 78), (63, 126), (115, 78), (48, 53), (55, 99), (93, 121), (60, 123), (94, 121), (68, 54), (119, 126), (123, 123), (30, 34), (50, 34), (31, 16), (13, 20), (10, 119), (21, 66), (126, 126), (103, 123), (56, 123), (5, 78), (39, 16), (22, 53), (17, 121), (52, 121), (51, 78), (107, 16), (95, 53), (42, 20), (65, 78), (66, 99), (71, 20), (124, 124), (79, 53), (23, 54), (69, 54), (89, 78), (15, 126), (102, 78), (78, 78), (11, 78), (46, 53), (92, 53), (108, 66)] current theta: 0.186876639415 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 22:43:57 2014 Optimize a model with 16257 rows, 16383 columns and 48641 nonzeros Presolve removed 14556 rows and 14587 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1701 rows, 1796 columns, 4944 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1796 integer (1796 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1777 iterations, 0.04 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1777 simplex iterations) in 0.07 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.187044392233 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 22:43:57 2014 Optimize a model with 16257 rows, 16383 columns and 48641 nonzeros Presolve removed 14552 rows and 14583 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1705 rows, 1800 columns, 4954 nonzeros Loaded MIP start with objective 0 Variable types: 0 continuous, 1800 integer (1800 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 73 iterations, 0.00 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 0.00000 -1.00000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (73 simplex iterations) in 0.03 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [16, 20, 34, 53, 54, 66, 78, 99, 119, 121, 123, 124, 126] edges [(53, 53), (114, 123), (120, 16), (100, 20), (91, 20), (6, 126), (41, 121), (76, 54), (47, 78), (75, 99), (40, 119), (73, 126), (1, 121), (16, 16), (105, 99), (88, 34), (36, 119), (43, 99), (61, 99), (104, 66), (32, 123), (84, 99), (8, 20), (77, 20), (109, 54), (38, 66), (4, 54), (90, 53), (116, 119), (19, 124), (122, 78), (64, 78), (67, 119), (74, 53), (125, 123), (0, 20), (9, 124), (24, 16), (110, 54), (29, 99), (70, 99), (12, 119), (7, 121), (72, 124), (57, 34), (101, 126), (27, 16), (96, 121), (86, 78), (99, 66), (37, 78), (112, 123), (117, 53), (58, 121), (33, 99), (26, 123), (121, 121), (83, 34), (35, 20), (28, 99), (2, 119), (44, 53), (49, 66), (85, 53), (106, 99), (111, 54), (97, 99), (62, 119), (118, 126), (59, 99), (18, 53), (82, 121), (20, 20), (80, 53), (3, 34), (87, 99), (25, 54), (113, 123), (98, 66), (54, 54), (81, 78), (34, 34), (45, 126), (14, 78), (63, 126), (115, 78), (48, 53), (55, 99), (93, 121), (60, 123), (94, 121), (68, 54), (119, 126), (123, 123), (30, 34), (50, 34), (31, 16), (13, 20), (10, 119), (21, 66), (126, 126), (103, 123), (56, 123), (5, 78), (39, 16), (22, 53), (17, 121), (52, 121), (51, 78), (107, 16), (95, 53), (42, 20), (65, 78), (66, 99), (71, 20), (124, 124), (79, 53), (23, 54), (69, 54), (89, 78), (15, 126), (102, 78), (78, 78), (11, 78), (46, 53), (92, 53), (108, 66)] current theta: 0.186960515824 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 22:43:57 2014 Optimize a model with 16257 rows, 16383 columns and 48641 nonzeros Presolve removed 14552 rows and 14583 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1705 rows, 1800 columns, 4954 nonzeros Loaded MIP start with objective 0 Variable types: 0 continuous, 1800 integer (1800 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 73 iterations, 0.00 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 0.00000 -1.00000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (73 simplex iterations) in 0.03 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [16, 20, 34, 53, 54, 66, 78, 99, 119, 121, 123, 124, 126] edges [(53, 53), (114, 123), (120, 16), (100, 20), (91, 20), (6, 126), (41, 121), (76, 54), (47, 78), (75, 99), (40, 119), (73, 126), (1, 121), (16, 16), (105, 99), (88, 34), (36, 119), (43, 99), (61, 99), (104, 66), (32, 123), (84, 99), (8, 20), (77, 20), (109, 54), (38, 66), (4, 54), (90, 53), (116, 119), (19, 124), (122, 78), (64, 78), (67, 119), (74, 53), (125, 123), (0, 20), (9, 124), (24, 16), (110, 54), (29, 99), (70, 99), (12, 119), (7, 121), (72, 124), (57, 34), (101, 126), (27, 16), (96, 121), (86, 78), (99, 66), (37, 78), (112, 123), (117, 53), (58, 121), (33, 99), (26, 123), (121, 121), (83, 34), (35, 20), (28, 99), (2, 119), (44, 53), (49, 66), (85, 53), (106, 99), (111, 54), (97, 99), (62, 119), (118, 126), (59, 99), (18, 53), (82, 121), (20, 20), (80, 53), (3, 34), (87, 99), (25, 54), (113, 123), (98, 66), (54, 54), (81, 78), (34, 34), (45, 126), (14, 78), (63, 126), (115, 78), (48, 53), (55, 99), (93, 121), (60, 123), (94, 121), (68, 54), (119, 126), (123, 123), (30, 34), (50, 34), (31, 16), (13, 20), (10, 119), (21, 66), (126, 126), (103, 123), (56, 123), (5, 78), (39, 16), (22, 53), (17, 121), (52, 121), (51, 78), (107, 16), (95, 53), (42, 20), (65, 78), (66, 99), (71, 20), (124, 124), (79, 53), (23, 54), (69, 54), (89, 78), (15, 126), (102, 78), (78, 78), (11, 78), (46, 53), (92, 53), (108, 66)]