current theta: 0.655844246275 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:39:08 2014 Optimize a model with 20593 rows, 20735 columns and 61633 nonzeros Presolve removed 6598 rows and 6598 columns Presolve time: 0.30s Presolved: 13995 rows, 14137 columns, 41839 nonzeros Variable types: 0 continuous, 14137 integer (14137 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1404 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2708 simplex iterations) in 0.41 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [3, 6, 7, 15, 51, 52, 55, 63, 70, 73, 100, 109, 112, 113, 142] edges [(122, 63), (100, 113), (47, 142), (86, 51), (73, 55), (135, 142), (118, 113), (25, 142), (17, 7), (0, 73), (68, 142), (134, 51), (63, 73), (78, 63), (49, 113), (132, 113), (102, 55), (6, 55), (46, 142), (27, 142), (45, 51), (126, 51), (50, 15), (127, 15), (23, 6), (5, 6), (3, 142), (84, 142), (96, 15), (48, 113), (76, 15), (131, 15), (40, 51), (138, 6), (1, 142), (81, 15), (43, 51), (11, 142), (4, 15), (67, 7), (57, 142), (8, 51), (69, 142), (30, 55), (93, 51), (74, 51), (83, 142), (14, 55), (29, 113), (15, 15), (77, 51), (9, 142), (61, 52), (39, 142), (22, 142), (95, 73), (94, 113), (140, 142), (137, 15), (142, 142), (123, 15), (129, 142), (103, 15), (85, 142), (10, 15), (18, 73), (99, 142), (112, 3), (110, 3), (31, 15), (53, 7), (13, 63), (24, 113), (116, 63), (117, 51), (106, 112), (41, 55), (52, 113), (101, 142), (33, 142), (65, 142), (124, 15), (98, 52), (80, 73), (79, 73), (34, 113), (91, 100), (51, 55), (121, 142), (120, 51), (70, 142), (114, 15), (26, 142), (16, 15), (133, 51), (109, 142), (37, 15), (141, 142), (42, 142), (60, 142), (44, 142), (54, 142), (111, 142), (28, 51), (108, 7), (7, 15), (82, 142), (92, 63), (130, 51), (12, 51), (97, 142), (64, 113), (35, 142), (75, 51), (55, 55), (58, 15), (113, 142), (104, 55), (136, 63), (2, 15), (119, 142), (105, 51), (139, 142), (107, 142), (66, 142), (32, 113), (72, 142), (128, 6), (125, 51), (89, 15), (36, 73), (90, 142), (19, 142), (71, 51), (21, 142), (38, 113), (62, 142), (115, 15), (88, 142), (59, 15), (87, 142), (20, 142), (56, 73)] current theta: 0.327922123138 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:39:09 2014 Optimize a model with 20593 rows, 20735 columns and 61633 nonzeros Presolve removed 15516 rows and 15517 columns Presolve time: 0.12s Presolved: 5077 rows, 5218 columns, 15084 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 5218 integer (5218 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1239 iterations, 0.04 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2837 simplex iterations) in 0.23 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [1, 7, 22, 43, 67, 68, 69, 70, 78, 90, 99, 101, 103, 109, 112] edges [(14, 90), (119, 90), (92, 78), (4, 7), (125, 43), (42, 101), (126, 43), (7, 7), (80, 90), (38, 1), (96, 67), (75, 90), (17, 7), (118, 43), (40, 43), (103, 103), (77, 78), (84, 22), (137, 7), (116, 90), (71, 68), (10, 67), (55, 90), (2, 68), (97, 101), (56, 78), (0, 78), (11, 68), (24, 68), (136, 90), (135, 1), (115, 67), (62, 101), (102, 90), (138, 78), (30, 67), (31, 68), (74, 43), (69, 101), (117, 43), (6, 90), (94, 68), (28, 1), (107, 68), (39, 78), (13, 78), (100, 68), (51, 101), (121, 90), (128, 78), (79, 90), (65, 90), (50, 67), (139, 90), (101, 69), (95, 67), (34, 7), (110, 68), (19, 101), (36, 90), (44, 1), (112, 70), (57, 7), (15, 43), (87, 101), (37, 7), (1, 68), (78, 90), (111, 22), (9, 101), (59, 67), (90, 90), (104, 90), (47, 101), (86, 7), (114, 78), (58, 78), (64, 68), (127, 43), (60, 90), (20, 112), (26, 101), (22, 22), (8, 78), (43, 43), (132, 101), (61, 43), (113, 68), (122, 90), (89, 43), (54, 78), (72, 70), (70, 70), (21, 90), (52, 43), (109, 70), (63, 90), (3, 101), (68, 68), (142, 70), (108, 68), (133, 67), (46, 101), (105, 43), (25, 68), (99, 90), (76, 68), (141, 68), (49, 68), (23, 99), (130, 103), (129, 101), (53, 43), (73, 90), (93, 7), (5, 78), (18, 90), (66, 101), (29, 68), (98, 43), (12, 90), (32, 1), (106, 70), (67, 67), (124, 43), (83, 90), (120, 68), (48, 43), (41, 78), (45, 67), (91, 43), (134, 1), (33, 90), (81, 68), (82, 1), (88, 101), (123, 78), (140, 101), (131, 43), (16, 7), (85, 1), (35, 109), (27, 101)] current theta: 0.163961061569 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:39:09 2014 Optimize a model with 20593 rows, 20735 columns and 61633 nonzeros Presolve removed 18958 rows and 19016 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1635 rows, 1719 columns, 4701 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1719 integer (1719 binary) Root relaxation: objective -7.105427e-15, 1598 iterations, 0.04 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 -0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2720 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [3, 19, 26, 36, 41, 43, 57, 71, 78, 93, 96, 97, 110, 134, 138] edges [(126, 93), (106, 3), (20, 97), (18, 41), (139, 26), (37, 134), (1, 57), (109, 3), (76, 134), (111, 110), (118, 43), (96, 96), (84, 97), (25, 110), (99, 78), (30, 41), (81, 71), (88, 26), (94, 110), (53, 134), (91, 93), (0, 41), (122, 36), (11, 110), (69, 19), (71, 71), (55, 36), (70, 3), (27, 26), (74, 43), (54, 138), (34, 134), (121, 19), (23, 36), (26, 26), (36, 36), (128, 78), (138, 138), (4, 43), (13, 41), (97, 97), (24, 71), (16, 93), (21, 26), (57, 57), (41, 41), (108, 134), (87, 19), (89, 96), (135, 97), (113, 110), (15, 43), (28, 57), (140, 26), (19, 19), (92, 138), (65, 138), (45, 96), (10, 96), (56, 41), (114, 78), (40, 134), (47, 3), (58, 78), (112, 3), (2, 134), (93, 43), (50, 96), (129, 19), (17, 43), (29, 71), (5, 41), (48, 134), (59, 96), (116, 36), (39, 138), (8, 78), (120, 134), (43, 43), (134, 134), (63, 36), (119, 19), (46, 97), (61, 43), (79, 78), (32, 93), (72, 97), (85, 138), (60, 138), (12, 78), (49, 71), (100, 134), (64, 134), (31, 134), (14, 78), (9, 26), (115, 43), (130, 138), (133, 96), (137, 134), (103, 41), (67, 96), (51, 57), (90, 78), (52, 134), (105, 43), (22, 110), (3, 3), (110, 110), (101, 26), (7, 43), (127, 138), (73, 36), (77, 41), (104, 78), (80, 78), (68, 71), (6, 36), (75, 78), (125, 134), (141, 57), (62, 26), (86, 57), (98, 96), (83, 19), (124, 43), (95, 41), (107, 110), (117, 57), (33, 78), (142, 3), (44, 97), (82, 110), (136, 78), (132, 26), (131, 96), (123, 78), (38, 138), (102, 78), (35, 3), (66, 97), (78, 78), (42, 19)] current theta: 0.0819805307844 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:39:09 2014 Optimize a model with 20593 rows, 20735 columns and 61633 nonzeros Presolve removed 19924 rows and 20066 columns Presolve time: 0.02s Presolved: 669 rows, 669 columns, 1737 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 669 integer (668 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 818 iterations, 0.01 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (818 simplex iterations) in 0.02 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.122970796177 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:39:09 2014 Optimize a model with 20593 rows, 20735 columns and 61633 nonzeros Presolve removed 19506 rows and 19631 columns Presolve time: 0.02s Presolved: 1087 rows, 1104 columns, 2990 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1104 integer (1104 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1304 iterations, 0.01 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1304 simplex iterations) in 0.03 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.143465928873 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:39:09 2014 Optimize a model with 20593 rows, 20735 columns and 61633 nonzeros Presolve removed 19268 rows and 19361 columns Presolve time: 0.02s Presolved: 1325 rows, 1374 columns, 3736 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1374 integer (1374 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1549 iterations, 0.02 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1549 simplex iterations) in 0.05 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.153713495221 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:39:09 2014 Optimize a model with 20593 rows, 20735 columns and 61633 nonzeros Presolve removed 19112 rows and 19181 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1481 rows, 1554 columns, 4228 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1554 integer (1554 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1808 iterations, 0.04 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1808 simplex iterations) in 0.07 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.158837278395 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:39:09 2014 Optimize a model with 20593 rows, 20735 columns and 61633 nonzeros Presolve removed 19040 rows and 19104 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1553 rows, 1631 columns, 4449 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1631 integer (1631 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1932 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1932 simplex iterations) in 0.07 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.161399169982 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:39:10 2014 Optimize a model with 20593 rows, 20735 columns and 61633 nonzeros Presolve removed 18990 rows and 19051 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1603 rows, 1684 columns, 4602 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1684 integer (1684 binary) Root relaxation: objective -1.421085e-14, 1814 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 -0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2800 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [29, 31, 36, 38, 41, 42, 43, 46, 62, 75, 83, 96, 109, 111, 125] edges [(33, 83), (124, 125), (87, 83), (130, 38), (54, 38), (16, 31), (127, 38), (11, 111), (96, 96), (107, 111), (66, 46), (104, 75), (134, 31), (62, 62), (30, 41), (88, 62), (140, 42), (80, 36), (135, 62), (4, 125), (90, 83), (122, 36), (128, 75), (22, 111), (55, 36), (27, 62), (118, 125), (125, 125), (137, 125), (109, 109), (74, 43), (3, 109), (38, 38), (119, 83), (7, 125), (92, 41), (23, 36), (70, 109), (36, 36), (40, 125), (13, 41), (48, 31), (19, 42), (41, 41), (139, 62), (100, 29), (113, 111), (8, 75), (89, 96), (32, 31), (94, 111), (91, 38), (15, 43), (138, 38), (18, 75), (111, 111), (2, 31), (35, 42), (45, 96), (10, 96), (56, 41), (25, 111), (101, 42), (141, 111), (93, 43), (64, 29), (50, 96), (17, 43), (5, 41), (49, 29), (20, 46), (0, 75), (59, 96), (114, 75), (83, 83), (43, 43), (63, 36), (71, 29), (97, 46), (57, 38), (61, 43), (86, 38), (46, 46), (76, 29), (53, 125), (39, 62), (132, 62), (75, 75), (115, 43), (34, 31), (58, 75), (133, 96), (42, 42), (103, 41), (67, 96), (79, 75), (52, 125), (29, 29), (65, 75), (12, 75), (105, 43), (14, 75), (126, 125), (72, 46), (73, 36), (81, 29), (77, 41), (102, 36), (110, 111), (99, 83), (6, 36), (112, 109), (24, 29), (136, 75), (44, 46), (117, 31), (98, 96), (1, 111), (120, 29), (78, 75), (129, 83), (95, 41), (37, 125), (108, 31), (21, 42), (68, 111), (85, 38), (116, 83), (131, 96), (31, 31), (69, 42), (9, 62), (142, 109), (51, 62), (47, 42), (82, 111), (60, 75), (121, 83), (106, 46), (123, 75), (26, 62), (84, 46), (28, 38)] current theta: 0.160118224188 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:39:10 2014 Optimize a model with 20593 rows, 20735 columns and 61633 nonzeros Presolve removed 19020 rows and 19083 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1573 rows, 1652 columns, 4510 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1652 integer (1652 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1834 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1834 simplex iterations) in 0.08 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.160758697085 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:39:10 2014 Optimize a model with 20593 rows, 20735 columns and 61633 nonzeros Presolve removed 19010 rows and 19073 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1583 rows, 1662 columns, 4540 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1662 integer (1662 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1935 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1935 simplex iterations) in 0.08 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.161078933533 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:39:10 2014 Optimize a model with 20593 rows, 20735 columns and 61633 nonzeros Presolve removed 19000 rows and 19062 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1593 rows, 1673 columns, 4571 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1673 integer (1673 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1911 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1911 simplex iterations) in 0.08 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.161239051758 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:39:10 2014 Optimize a model with 20593 rows, 20735 columns and 61633 nonzeros Presolve removed 18994 rows and 19055 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1599 rows, 1680 columns, 4590 nonzeros Loaded MIP start with objective 0 Variable types: 0 continuous, 1680 integer (1680 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 62 iterations, 0.00 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 0.00000 -1.00000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (62 simplex iterations) in 0.03 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [29, 31, 36, 38, 41, 42, 43, 46, 62, 75, 83, 96, 109, 111, 125] edges [(33, 83), (124, 125), (87, 83), (130, 38), (54, 38), (16, 31), (127, 38), (11, 111), (96, 96), (107, 111), (66, 46), (104, 75), (134, 31), (62, 62), (30, 41), (88, 62), (140, 42), (80, 36), (135, 62), (4, 125), (90, 83), (122, 36), (128, 75), (22, 111), (55, 36), (27, 62), (118, 125), (125, 125), (137, 125), (109, 109), (74, 43), (3, 109), (38, 38), (119, 83), (7, 125), (92, 41), (23, 36), (70, 109), (36, 36), (40, 125), (13, 41), (48, 31), (19, 42), (41, 41), (139, 62), (100, 29), (113, 111), (8, 75), (89, 96), (32, 31), (94, 111), (91, 38), (15, 43), (138, 38), (18, 75), (111, 111), (2, 31), (35, 42), (45, 96), (10, 96), (56, 41), (25, 111), (101, 42), (141, 111), (93, 43), (64, 29), (50, 96), (17, 43), (5, 41), (49, 29), (20, 46), (0, 75), (59, 96), (114, 75), (83, 83), (43, 43), (63, 36), (71, 29), (97, 46), (57, 38), (61, 43), (86, 38), (46, 46), (76, 29), (53, 125), (39, 62), (132, 62), (75, 75), (115, 43), (34, 31), (58, 75), (133, 96), (42, 42), (103, 41), (67, 96), (79, 75), (52, 125), (29, 29), (65, 75), (12, 75), (105, 43), (14, 75), (126, 125), (72, 46), (73, 36), (81, 29), (77, 41), (102, 36), (110, 111), (99, 83), (6, 36), (112, 109), (24, 29), (136, 75), (44, 46), (117, 31), (98, 96), (1, 111), (120, 29), (78, 75), (129, 83), (95, 41), (37, 125), (108, 31), (21, 42), (68, 111), (85, 38), (116, 83), (131, 96), (31, 31), (69, 42), (9, 62), (142, 109), (51, 62), (47, 42), (82, 111), (60, 75), (121, 83), (106, 46), (123, 75), (26, 62), (84, 46), (28, 38)] current theta: 0.161158992646 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:39:10 2014 Optimize a model with 20593 rows, 20735 columns and 61633 nonzeros Presolve removed 18996 rows and 19058 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1597 rows, 1677 columns, 4583 nonzeros Loaded MIP start with objective 0 Variable types: 0 continuous, 1677 integer (1677 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 63 iterations, 0.00 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 0.00000 -1.00000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (63 simplex iterations) in 0.03 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [29, 31, 36, 38, 41, 42, 43, 46, 62, 75, 83, 96, 109, 111, 125] edges [(33, 83), (124, 125), (87, 83), (130, 38), (54, 38), (16, 31), (127, 38), (11, 111), (96, 96), (107, 111), (66, 46), (104, 75), (134, 31), (62, 62), (30, 41), (88, 62), (140, 42), (80, 36), (135, 62), (4, 125), (90, 83), (122, 36), (128, 75), (22, 111), (55, 36), (27, 62), (118, 125), (125, 125), (137, 125), (109, 109), (74, 43), (3, 109), (38, 38), (119, 83), (7, 125), (92, 41), (23, 36), (70, 109), (36, 36), (40, 125), (13, 41), (48, 31), (19, 42), (41, 41), (139, 62), (100, 29), (113, 111), (8, 75), (89, 96), (32, 31), (94, 111), (91, 38), (15, 43), (138, 38), (18, 75), (111, 111), (2, 31), (35, 42), (45, 96), (10, 96), (56, 41), (25, 111), (101, 42), (141, 111), (93, 43), (64, 29), (50, 96), (17, 43), (5, 41), (49, 29), (20, 46), (0, 75), (59, 96), (114, 75), (83, 83), (43, 43), (63, 36), (71, 29), (97, 46), (57, 38), (61, 43), (86, 38), (46, 46), (76, 29), (53, 125), (39, 62), (132, 62), (75, 75), (115, 43), (34, 31), (58, 75), (133, 96), (42, 42), (103, 41), (67, 96), (79, 75), (52, 125), (29, 29), (65, 75), (12, 75), (105, 43), (14, 75), (126, 125), (72, 46), (73, 36), (81, 29), (77, 41), (102, 36), (110, 111), (99, 83), (6, 36), (112, 109), (24, 29), (136, 75), (44, 46), (117, 31), (98, 96), (1, 111), (120, 29), (78, 75), (129, 83), (95, 41), (37, 125), (108, 31), (21, 42), (68, 111), (85, 38), (116, 83), (131, 96), (31, 31), (69, 42), (9, 62), (142, 109), (51, 62), (47, 42), (82, 111), (60, 75), (121, 83), (106, 46), (123, 75), (26, 62), (84, 46), (28, 38)]