current theta: 0.656329546709 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:40:30 2014 Optimize a model with 20881 rows, 21024 columns and 62496 nonzeros Presolve removed 6648 rows and 6648 columns Presolve time: 0.30s Presolved: 14233 rows, 14376 columns, 42552 nonzeros Variable types: 0 continuous, 14376 integer (14376 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1887 iterations, 0.11 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3469 simplex iterations) in 0.53 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [0, 15, 29, 34, 44, 52, 55, 102, 104, 115, 117, 120, 123, 125, 141] edges [(108, 141), (142, 141), (11, 141), (132, 141), (113, 141), (63, 141), (6, 141), (120, 141), (36, 141), (45, 141), (68, 141), (55, 15), (114, 141), (10, 141), (13, 141), (124, 141), (25, 141), (57, 141), (92, 102), (67, 141), (43, 141), (86, 141), (22, 141), (88, 141), (34, 141), (143, 141), (16, 141), (48, 141), (119, 141), (139, 141), (15, 0), (95, 141), (133, 141), (138, 141), (94, 141), (18, 141), (7, 141), (39, 141), (26, 141), (140, 141), (21, 102), (53, 141), (32, 141), (64, 141), (131, 141), (12, 141), (44, 141), (136, 141), (59, 141), (89, 141), (50, 141), (9, 141), (37, 141), (69, 141), (99, 141), (78, 141), (110, 141), (134, 141), (104, 141), (3, 141), (41, 141), (28, 141), (60, 141), (122, 102), (23, 141), (5, 141), (129, 141), (85, 141), (125, 141), (91, 120), (17, 141), (126, 141), (127, 141), (58, 141), (121, 120), (46, 141), (141, 141), (76, 141), (0, 0), (135, 141), (62, 141), (96, 141), (115, 141), (101, 141), (123, 102), (117, 141), (65, 141), (137, 141), (74, 141), (106, 141), (130, 141), (75, 141), (54, 141), (42, 141), (111, 141), (35, 141), (14, 141), (49, 141), (73, 141), (8, 141), (40, 141), (81, 141), (29, 141), (38, 141), (70, 141), (102, 141), (2, 102), (71, 141), (66, 120), (107, 141), (128, 141), (109, 141), (27, 141), (100, 141), (51, 141), (112, 102), (31, 141), (19, 141), (83, 141), (116, 141), (24, 141), (56, 141), (97, 141), (84, 125), (4, 141), (77, 141), (118, 141), (82, 141), (33, 120), (80, 141), (1, 141), (90, 141), (47, 141), (30, 141), (72, 141), (20, 141), (52, 141), (61, 141), (93, 141), (87, 102), (103, 141), (98, 141), (105, 55), (79, 141)] current theta: 0.328164773355 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:40:31 2014 Optimize a model with 20881 rows, 21024 columns and 62496 nonzeros Presolve removed 15560 rows and 15560 columns Presolve time: 0.12s Presolved: 5321 rows, 5464 columns, 15816 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 5464 integer (5464 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1218 iterations, 0.04 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2407 simplex iterations) in 0.22 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [0, 15, 29, 49, 56, 61, 78, 82, 90, 94, 96, 98, 99, 126, 142] edges [(128, 82), (57, 78), (63, 96), (83, 126), (111, 98), (6, 126), (86, 126), (112, 98), (107, 78), (59, 126), (118, 29), (40, 78), (135, 142), (139, 29), (47, 78), (36, 82), (108, 96), (106, 96), (2, 96), (7, 78), (38, 78), (109, 29), (75, 98), (48, 126), (99, 78), (13, 142), (58, 142), (79, 94), (46, 142), (84, 99), (100, 90), (30, 142), (51, 99), (23, 78), (18, 78), (41, 0), (62, 78), (120, 78), (5, 142), (64, 98), (98, 142), (11, 98), (119, 78), (4, 126), (68, 126), (74, 126), (56, 82), (122, 98), (69, 142), (134, 98), (34, 78), (137, 142), (15, 15), (0, 82), (103, 142), (124, 90), (140, 142), (142, 142), (129, 142), (104, 90), (45, 96), (55, 82), (115, 29), (123, 98), (94, 82), (17, 142), (125, 78), (1, 126), (33, 99), (81, 96), (19, 49), (138, 82), (76, 78), (73, 78), (25, 126), (101, 142), (53, 126), (20, 90), (32, 126), (14, 142), (70, 126), (130, 82), (49, 142), (136, 29), (21, 90), (72, 99), (9, 78), (85, 29), (102, 98), (12, 142), (67, 96), (141, 142), (42, 142), (29, 29), (117, 90), (77, 98), (54, 142), (92, 96), (110, 82), (35, 29), (96, 29), (105, 82), (133, 49), (82, 142), (87, 90), (60, 78), (91, 126), (132, 99), (80, 99), (8, 126), (39, 94), (10, 78), (126, 78), (97, 94), (113, 142), (27, 78), (3, 96), (50, 78), (121, 78), (31, 29), (71, 142), (26, 78), (24, 142), (116, 126), (28, 90), (89, 98), (90, 142), (22, 98), (127, 78), (61, 142), (93, 142), (95, 90), (44, 126), (65, 96), (114, 142), (16, 99), (52, 142), (66, 126), (88, 142), (78, 78), (43, 0), (131, 142), (37, 94), (143, 29)] current theta: 0.164082386677 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:40:31 2014 Optimize a model with 20881 rows, 21024 columns and 62496 nonzeros Presolve removed 19260 rows and 19324 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1621 rows, 1700 columns, 4652 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1700 integer (1700 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2033 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2033 simplex iterations) in 0.08 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.246123580016 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:40:31 2014 Optimize a model with 20881 rows, 21024 columns and 62496 nonzeros Presolve removed 17620 rows and 17623 columns Presolve time: 0.06s Presolved: 3261 rows, 3401 columns, 9633 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 3401 integer (3401 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1535 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3215 simplex iterations) in 0.17 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [15, 30, 50, 59, 64, 77, 80, 93, 102, 104, 121, 132, 136, 138, 143] edges [(51, 121), (71, 138), (94, 138), (49, 80), (96, 143), (102, 104), (46, 138), (20, 143), (48, 80), (17, 80), (113, 138), (78, 132), (132, 132), (89, 104), (108, 143), (100, 143), (57, 132), (37, 80), (93, 93), (104, 102), (5, 138), (127, 80), (75, 93), (43, 138), (86, 121), (99, 121), (115, 136), (30, 93), (133, 143), (58, 93), (12, 30), (68, 59), (70, 59), (143, 143), (18, 132), (34, 50), (14, 64), (67, 143), (61, 93), (2, 143), (11, 143), (66, 121), (85, 136), (36, 138), (80, 80), (38, 59), (91, 121), (129, 138), (138, 138), (141, 80), (69, 143), (21, 102), (105, 138), (6, 132), (76, 136), (41, 138), (26, 132), (22, 93), (27, 132), (15, 15), (8, 132), (119, 143), (118, 136), (24, 143), (44, 59), (4, 121), (112, 104), (121, 121), (23, 143), (77, 104), (128, 138), (122, 104), (131, 80), (62, 136), (135, 93), (33, 59), (28, 143), (83, 80), (101, 143), (40, 59), (117, 102), (107, 80), (0, 15), (106, 143), (39, 138), (74, 80), (59, 59), (32, 132), (109, 143), (9, 132), (95, 143), (103, 93), (56, 138), (120, 132), (123, 102), (136, 136), (10, 132), (60, 121), (72, 132), (7, 132), (142, 64), (47, 121), (139, 143), (25, 138), (79, 138), (53, 80), (45, 143), (81, 143), (114, 93), (55, 138), (116, 59), (130, 80), (111, 30), (126, 121), (13, 102), (35, 143), (16, 59), (50, 132), (110, 80), (64, 93), (90, 77), (54, 143), (52, 93), (124, 77), (98, 93), (137, 30), (19, 143), (134, 93), (63, 132), (31, 143), (82, 138), (29, 136), (65, 77), (140, 93), (42, 102), (125, 50), (3, 143), (88, 93), (97, 59), (87, 102), (92, 77), (1, 59), (84, 121), (73, 132)] current theta: 0.205102983347 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:40:31 2014 Optimize a model with 20881 rows, 21024 columns and 62496 nonzeros Presolve removed 18498 rows and 18515 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2383 rows, 2509 columns, 6985 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2509 integer (2509 binary) Root relaxation: objective -7.105427e-15, 1854 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 -0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (4246 simplex iterations) in 0.14 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [15, 48, 57, 64, 72, 83, 85, 87, 90, 93, 94, 116, 121, 123, 143] edges [(51, 121), (105, 15), (36, 116), (96, 143), (136, 85), (120, 72), (19, 90), (29, 85), (50, 72), (85, 85), (108, 143), (26, 72), (40, 83), (100, 143), (55, 15), (93, 93), (132, 72), (16, 116), (75, 93), (86, 121), (99, 121), (79, 94), (44, 116), (133, 143), (21, 87), (97, 83), (7, 72), (143, 143), (14, 64), (122, 87), (67, 143), (5, 94), (103, 94), (61, 93), (66, 121), (11, 90), (91, 121), (73, 57), (69, 143), (65, 90), (46, 94), (34, 121), (57, 57), (17, 48), (68, 83), (22, 93), (80, 83), (63, 57), (115, 85), (138, 94), (15, 15), (119, 143), (58, 64), (124, 90), (90, 90), (4, 121), (118, 85), (107, 83), (33, 116), (112, 123), (25, 94), (121, 121), (62, 85), (82, 94), (48, 48), (24, 57), (28, 143), (117, 123), (116, 116), (74, 83), (127, 121), (53, 83), (27, 72), (41, 64), (131, 83), (0, 15), (106, 143), (54, 48), (83, 83), (109, 143), (134, 64), (20, 90), (95, 143), (76, 72), (9, 72), (2, 90), (60, 121), (43, 94), (47, 121), (139, 143), (130, 83), (6, 121), (45, 143), (81, 143), (10, 121), (114, 93), (137, 48), (142, 93), (23, 57), (125, 72), (101, 48), (12, 48), (72, 72), (8, 72), (102, 87), (18, 48), (129, 94), (123, 123), (38, 83), (56, 94), (113, 83), (135, 90), (13, 123), (110, 83), (71, 83), (35, 143), (37, 83), (104, 87), (77, 87), (42, 123), (39, 94), (141, 57), (1, 116), (52, 93), (64, 94), (49, 48), (128, 94), (98, 93), (89, 123), (87, 87), (94, 94), (31, 143), (78, 72), (30, 90), (92, 87), (140, 93), (3, 143), (32, 72), (88, 93), (70, 116), (84, 121), (126, 83), (111, 87), (59, 83)] current theta: 0.184592685012 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:40:32 2014 Optimize a model with 20881 rows, 21024 columns and 62496 nonzeros Presolve removed 18904 rows and 18942 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1977 rows, 2082 columns, 5746 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2082 integer (2082 binary) Root relaxation: objective -2.842171e-14, 1460 iterations, 0.04 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 -0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2609 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [15, 19, 51, 58, 82, 93, 101, 104, 108, 114, 121, 125, 130, 131, 139] edges [(51, 121), (128, 82), (45, 19), (102, 104), (123, 114), (31, 139), (120, 125), (117, 104), (76, 125), (143, 139), (16, 51), (44, 130), (109, 139), (24, 101), (55, 15), (37, 130), (93, 93), (73, 125), (107, 121), (86, 121), (99, 121), (40, 121), (96, 139), (131, 131), (5, 131), (39, 82), (10, 125), (11, 19), (80, 131), (3, 139), (68, 130), (125, 125), (61, 93), (69, 101), (77, 19), (66, 121), (8, 125), (71, 131), (1, 51), (7, 125), (28, 101), (21, 104), (87, 104), (9, 125), (132, 125), (62, 139), (46, 130), (119, 101), (56, 82), (34, 121), (98, 114), (79, 130), (22, 93), (92, 19), (20, 108), (89, 114), (81, 108), (15, 15), (26, 125), (74, 131), (19, 19), (136, 139), (129, 131), (101, 19), (4, 51), (72, 125), (94, 82), (30, 114), (112, 104), (70, 51), (121, 121), (113, 131), (90, 19), (14, 58), (78, 125), (122, 104), (138, 82), (111, 19), (139, 139), (50, 125), (127, 121), (116, 130), (59, 130), (0, 15), (88, 131), (104, 104), (85, 139), (75, 58), (140, 58), (17, 131), (124, 108), (52, 114), (67, 19), (18, 125), (49, 131), (60, 121), (35, 139), (47, 121), (12, 19), (6, 121), (118, 139), (114, 93), (25, 130), (58, 58), (137, 101), (142, 93), (13, 58), (106, 139), (100, 108), (27, 125), (105, 82), (32, 125), (91, 51), (43, 82), (57, 125), (53, 130), (134, 58), (33, 51), (29, 139), (103, 82), (133, 19), (63, 101), (23, 125), (110, 130), (54, 101), (65, 19), (108, 108), (141, 19), (41, 82), (135, 114), (83, 131), (82, 82), (42, 114), (2, 108), (95, 101), (97, 130), (48, 101), (126, 130), (38, 130), (36, 130), (115, 139), (84, 121), (130, 131), (64, 82)] current theta: 0.174337535845 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:40:32 2014 Optimize a model with 20881 rows, 21024 columns and 62496 nonzeros Presolve removed 19068 rows and 19115 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1813 rows, 1909 columns, 5245 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1909 integer (1909 binary) Root relaxation: objective 7.105427e-15, 1710 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3630 simplex iterations) in 0.13 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [6, 14, 31, 34, 35, 45, 46, 51, 92, 105, 112, 114, 125, 130, 137] edges [(62, 31), (139, 35), (141, 137), (76, 125), (48, 137), (119, 137), (80, 34), (100, 45), (16, 51), (44, 130), (40, 6), (38, 34), (71, 46), (61, 137), (37, 130), (124, 92), (111, 92), (75, 14), (131, 46), (73, 125), (87, 112), (66, 51), (82, 105), (39, 46), (81, 45), (0, 105), (10, 125), (93, 114), (77, 112), (14, 14), (68, 130), (125, 125), (108, 45), (49, 137), (143, 45), (92, 92), (1, 51), (7, 125), (94, 105), (9, 125), (132, 125), (13, 114), (96, 45), (55, 105), (11, 92), (34, 6), (117, 112), (107, 34), (19, 45), (98, 114), (17, 137), (79, 130), (90, 92), (47, 6), (60, 6), (67, 45), (5, 130), (26, 125), (122, 112), (86, 6), (4, 51), (72, 125), (23, 35), (84, 51), (30, 114), (133, 45), (45, 45), (70, 51), (103, 14), (105, 105), (51, 51), (22, 114), (78, 125), (69, 137), (115, 31), (65, 92), (50, 125), (116, 130), (112, 112), (59, 130), (88, 46), (21, 92), (6, 34), (52, 114), (99, 6), (46, 46), (106, 31), (41, 14), (54, 137), (85, 31), (18, 125), (15, 105), (20, 92), (29, 31), (138, 105), (56, 46), (120, 6), (25, 130), (134, 14), (130, 130), (129, 46), (28, 45), (113, 46), (24, 137), (12, 137), (27, 125), (95, 45), (32, 125), (102, 112), (101, 137), (137, 137), (63, 35), (91, 51), (57, 125), (53, 130), (58, 14), (43, 105), (33, 51), (89, 112), (35, 31), (140, 14), (110, 130), (8, 6), (121, 34), (135, 114), (109, 35), (74, 34), (3, 45), (31, 31), (42, 114), (114, 114), (127, 6), (83, 130), (97, 130), (104, 112), (126, 130), (128, 105), (123, 112), (64, 14), (36, 130), (2, 92), (142, 114), (118, 31), (136, 35)] current theta: 0.169209961261 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:40:32 2014 Optimize a model with 20881 rows, 21024 columns and 62496 nonzeros Presolve removed 19152 rows and 19206 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1729 rows, 1818 columns, 4986 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1818 integer (1818 binary) Root relaxation: objective -4.263256e-14, 1801 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 -0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2901 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [11, 27, 42, 48, 51, 68, 85, 98, 104, 105, 119, 127, 129, 134, 143] edges [(52, 98), (65, 11), (137, 119), (96, 143), (136, 85), (75, 134), (102, 104), (73, 48), (30, 98), (116, 68), (117, 104), (10, 27), (140, 134), (29, 85), (16, 51), (57, 48), (85, 85), (108, 143), (109, 85), (100, 143), (58, 134), (34, 127), (88, 129), (19, 11), (78, 27), (83, 127), (69, 48), (66, 51), (37, 68), (133, 143), (82, 105), (27, 27), (76, 85), (71, 129), (0, 105), (90, 11), (143, 143), (23, 119), (32, 27), (61, 98), (9, 127), (86, 127), (79, 68), (111, 11), (67, 143), (1, 51), (13, 42), (94, 105), (21, 104), (87, 104), (14, 134), (26, 27), (55, 105), (63, 119), (17, 48), (47, 27), (128, 129), (12, 119), (110, 68), (40, 127), (103, 134), (115, 85), (56, 129), (142, 98), (80, 48), (120, 27), (4, 51), (118, 85), (36, 68), (125, 27), (8, 27), (84, 51), (97, 68), (135, 98), (112, 104), (123, 42), (70, 51), (105, 105), (62, 85), (51, 51), (41, 134), (11, 11), (92, 11), (48, 48), (122, 104), (28, 143), (59, 68), (77, 11), (104, 104), (121, 127), (106, 143), (54, 48), (20, 11), (134, 134), (95, 143), (5, 129), (129, 129), (15, 105), (138, 105), (139, 143), (89, 42), (64, 134), (45, 143), (81, 143), (42, 42), (68, 68), (101, 48), (18, 48), (7, 85), (25, 68), (38, 127), (124, 11), (131, 129), (107, 127), (24, 119), (39, 129), (93, 98), (50, 27), (91, 51), (98, 98), (43, 105), (33, 51), (35, 85), (141, 119), (74, 127), (99, 127), (60, 27), (49, 48), (6, 127), (44, 68), (31, 143), (126, 127), (114, 42), (113, 129), (72, 27), (22, 98), (127, 127), (53, 68), (3, 143), (46, 129), (130, 68), (119, 119), (132, 27), (2, 11)] current theta: 0.166646173969 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:40:32 2014 Optimize a model with 20881 rows, 21024 columns and 62496 nonzeros Presolve removed 19206 rows and 19266 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1675 rows, 1758 columns, 4818 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1758 integer (1758 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1904 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1904 simplex iterations) in 0.08 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.167928067615 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:40:32 2014 Optimize a model with 20881 rows, 21024 columns and 62496 nonzeros Presolve removed 19188 rows and 19245 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1693 rows, 1779 columns, 4875 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1779 integer (1779 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1690 iterations, 0.03 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1690 simplex iterations) in 0.06 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [48, 51, 57, 85, 98, 104, 105, 111, 120, 123, 127, 129, 130, 134, 143] edges [(52, 98), (96, 143), (136, 85), (75, 134), (102, 104), (73, 48), (30, 98), (117, 104), (78, 57), (140, 134), (29, 85), (16, 51), (44, 130), (85, 85), (108, 143), (11, 111), (109, 85), (100, 143), (37, 130), (58, 134), (34, 127), (88, 129), (138, 129), (65, 111), (27, 120), (141, 48), (69, 48), (66, 51), (76, 85), (71, 129), (0, 105), (143, 143), (10, 120), (61, 98), (9, 127), (86, 127), (67, 143), (68, 130), (124, 111), (1, 51), (72, 120), (21, 104), (87, 104), (14, 134), (82, 129), (55, 105), (57, 57), (17, 48), (19, 111), (132, 120), (79, 130), (128, 129), (40, 127), (119, 48), (103, 134), (63, 57), (115, 85), (56, 129), (142, 98), (80, 48), (111, 111), (4, 51), (118, 85), (18, 57), (84, 51), (135, 98), (112, 104), (70, 51), (105, 105), (62, 85), (51, 51), (41, 134), (60, 120), (48, 48), (24, 57), (122, 104), (26, 120), (28, 143), (53, 127), (116, 130), (59, 130), (104, 104), (121, 127), (106, 143), (2, 111), (54, 48), (134, 134), (120, 120), (20, 111), (95, 143), (114, 98), (90, 111), (5, 129), (129, 129), (15, 105), (139, 143), (64, 134), (81, 143), (25, 130), (130, 130), (137, 48), (23, 57), (125, 57), (101, 48), (12, 48), (133, 111), (7, 85), (123, 123), (38, 127), (131, 129), (107, 127), (39, 129), (93, 98), (47, 120), (13, 123), (91, 51), (98, 98), (43, 105), (33, 51), (35, 85), (8, 120), (42, 123), (74, 127), (99, 127), (94, 129), (110, 130), (49, 48), (6, 127), (45, 111), (89, 123), (31, 143), (92, 111), (32, 120), (126, 127), (113, 129), (22, 98), (127, 127), (77, 111), (3, 143), (83, 130), (97, 130), (46, 129), (36, 130), (50, 57)] current theta: 0.167287120792 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:40:32 2014 Optimize a model with 20881 rows, 21024 columns and 62496 nonzeros Presolve removed 19192 rows and 19249 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1689 rows, 1775 columns, 4863 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1775 integer (1775 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1843 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1843 simplex iterations) in 0.08 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.167607594204 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:40:33 2014 Optimize a model with 20881 rows, 21024 columns and 62496 nonzeros Presolve removed 19192 rows and 19249 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1689 rows, 1775 columns, 4863 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1775 integer (1775 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1843 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1843 simplex iterations) in 0.08 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.167767830909 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:40:33 2014 Optimize a model with 20881 rows, 21024 columns and 62496 nonzeros Presolve removed 19190 rows and 19247 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1691 rows, 1777 columns, 4869 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1777 integer (1777 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1997 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1997 simplex iterations) in 0.08 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.167847949262 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:40:33 2014 Optimize a model with 20881 rows, 21024 columns and 62496 nonzeros Presolve removed 19190 rows and 19247 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1691 rows, 1777 columns, 4869 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1777 integer (1777 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1997 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1997 simplex iterations) in 0.08 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap -