current theta: 0.611665396134 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:58:06 2014 Optimize a model with 23257 rows, 23408 columns and 69616 nonzeros Presolve removed 8498 rows and 8498 columns Presolve time: 0.31s Presolved: 14759 rows, 14910 columns, 44122 nonzeros Variable types: 0 continuous, 14910 integer (14910 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1453 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2828 simplex iterations) in 0.42 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [20, 26, 27, 30, 50, 70, 75, 79, 84, 89, 91, 97, 98, 110, 134, 143] edges [(115, 134), (69, 20), (93, 97), (94, 70), (19, 97), (58, 91), (14, 84), (122, 134), (150, 30), (12, 143), (104, 143), (1, 89), (151, 30), (130, 26), (29, 143), (3, 89), (34, 134), (25, 134), (24, 30), (2, 97), (98, 91), (62, 98), (141, 89), (37, 89), (51, 84), (56, 30), (0, 30), (43, 97), (118, 91), (88, 26), (27, 26), (121, 84), (92, 97), (140, 30), (57, 30), (111, 97), (66, 91), (54, 26), (123, 97), (75, 27), (120, 26), (61, 89), (64, 143), (135, 143), (8, 26), (7, 50), (59, 97), (89, 30), (35, 134), (63, 89), (50, 97), (39, 27), (132, 89), (70, 70), (23, 26), (85, 30), (80, 75), (96, 84), (49, 89), (139, 84), (149, 70), (95, 89), (45, 97), (117, 30), (10, 30), (41, 26), (138, 89), (42, 143), (109, 89), (71, 50), (72, 84), (5, 84), (47, 91), (126, 134), (99, 26), (144, 89), (79, 91), (124, 26), (48, 30), (44, 84), (26, 27), (127, 134), (105, 26), (110, 97), (15, 70), (78, 89), (90, 89), (46, 97), (136, 97), (32, 50), (30, 27), (6, 89), (106, 26), (101, 26), (87, 91), (73, 91), (52, 20), (84, 89), (28, 89), (4, 27), (53, 97), (76, 134), (40, 110), (9, 91), (102, 134), (16, 27), (91, 91), (33, 70), (81, 134), (86, 89), (146, 89), (116, 89), (97, 91), (100, 89), (60, 97), (36, 89), (148, 84), (103, 84), (143, 89), (119, 97), (137, 70), (38, 89), (74, 27), (17, 98), (65, 143), (113, 97), (11, 134), (129, 89), (133, 70), (55, 97), (128, 134), (18, 97), (22, 20), (134, 70), (67, 97), (77, 91), (145, 97), (114, 84), (21, 134), (142, 26), (82, 89), (125, 70), (131, 89), (83, 89), (13, 91), (147, 26), (31, 97), (20, 91), (112, 89), (68, 110), (107, 110), (108, 97)] current theta: 0.305832698067 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:58:07 2014 Optimize a model with 23257 rows, 23408 columns and 69616 nonzeros Presolve removed 18024 rows and 18024 columns Presolve time: 0.12s Presolved: 5233 rows, 5384 columns, 15544 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 5384 integer (5384 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1529 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3484 simplex iterations) in 0.26 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [0, 20, 66, 71, 78, 79, 83, 92, 105, 112, 118, 122, 131, 133, 141, 143] edges [(4, 112), (124, 105), (90, 83), (113, 79), (137, 122), (71, 71), (52, 105), (112, 112), (8, 122), (95, 79), (136, 92), (88, 141), (89, 112), (143, 92), (97, 20), (22, 118), (5, 0), (105, 105), (98, 71), (51, 133), (13, 71), (7, 133), (109, 71), (32, 133), (103, 83), (30, 83), (96, 141), (21, 122), (117, 143), (100, 105), (10, 141), (142, 143), (83, 92), (149, 79), (11, 78), (118, 71), (47, 71), (64, 83), (6, 141), (23, 122), (101, 0), (12, 0), (2, 92), (104, 83), (140, 0), (75, 0), (34, 122), (148, 0), (115, 141), (38, 141), (110, 143), (68, 83), (135, 143), (122, 122), (41, 141), (132, 122), (134, 122), (85, 141), (126, 141), (60, 143), (87, 92), (19, 79), (130, 78), (106, 141), (127, 122), (151, 141), (123, 92), (131, 122), (50, 118), (102, 141), (76, 105), (53, 92), (121, 79), (36, 79), (48, 92), (111, 92), (57, 79), (77, 118), (73, 92), (35, 105), (49, 133), (39, 92), (79, 133), (129, 78), (25, 78), (72, 92), (18, 79), (94, 105), (16, 92), (1, 122), (58, 66), (55, 79), (17, 143), (119, 71), (59, 71), (0, 0), (33, 141), (15, 105), (84, 0), (44, 105), (46, 133), (80, 141), (144, 0), (74, 92), (150, 20), (116, 143), (146, 122), (29, 83), (128, 112), (114, 83), (56, 141), (9, 112), (37, 112), (139, 0), (92, 143), (78, 78), (45, 92), (67, 71), (26, 141), (99, 105), (54, 0), (27, 143), (31, 79), (120, 105), (28, 0), (147, 122), (66, 118), (69, 71), (63, 83), (86, 0), (145, 105), (65, 0), (125, 141), (70, 122), (61, 133), (82, 122), (20, 118), (107, 141), (138, 105), (91, 66), (108, 105), (3, 141), (14, 105), (141, 141), (81, 122), (43, 118), (62, 66), (93, 83), (24, 141), (40, 0), (42, 20), (133, 105)] current theta: 0.152916349034 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:58:07 2014 Optimize a model with 23257 rows, 23408 columns and 69616 nonzeros Presolve removed 21490 rows and 21543 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1767 rows, 1865 columns, 5093 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1865 integer (1865 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2231 iterations, 0.07 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2231 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.22937452355 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:58:08 2014 Optimize a model with 23257 rows, 23408 columns and 69616 nonzeros Presolve removed 20006 rows and 20008 columns Presolve time: 0.06s Presolved: 3251 rows, 3400 columns, 9596 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 3400 integer (3400 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1595 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2900 simplex iterations) in 0.15 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [14, 27, 36, 76, 86, 90, 118, 123, 134, 138, 141, 143, 145, 149, 150, 151] edges [(12, 90), (41, 86), (64, 86), (68, 86), (11, 141), (27, 27), (16, 90), (45, 145), (114, 27), (63, 86), (94, 145), (39, 90), (86, 86), (2, 145), (47, 150), (83, 143), (122, 134), (5, 90), (78, 141), (138, 149), (104, 90), (79, 76), (131, 138), (19, 76), (54, 151), (74, 143), (126, 149), (101, 151), (34, 134), (113, 145), (120, 149), (38, 86), (117, 143), (3, 151), (22, 150), (142, 143), (32, 76), (44, 149), (132, 149), (6, 141), (51, 149), (4, 145), (109, 145), (56, 151), (150, 150), (115, 141), (18, 145), (36, 36), (110, 143), (73, 150), (135, 143), (71, 150), (148, 86), (129, 141), (103, 86), (60, 143), (118, 150), (57, 150), (149, 149), (61, 76), (50, 118), (97, 118), (98, 150), (62, 150), (102, 141), (93, 150), (119, 150), (9, 149), (137, 138), (128, 141), (31, 149), (133, 76), (124, 149), (10, 151), (111, 150), (35, 76), (13, 150), (25, 141), (107, 123), (24, 151), (15, 149), (72, 123), (53, 150), (67, 150), (75, 151), (17, 143), (55, 145), (112, 145), (8, 134), (42, 150), (100, 141), (134, 134), (49, 149), (33, 141), (69, 118), (127, 149), (88, 151), (80, 141), (106, 151), (14, 141), (116, 143), (108, 149), (146, 138), (87, 150), (99, 14), (147, 134), (92, 143), (7, 76), (85, 86), (26, 141), (82, 134), (0, 86), (46, 145), (140, 90), (121, 149), (84, 141), (143, 143), (95, 76), (52, 149), (91, 118), (151, 151), (23, 149), (66, 118), (144, 90), (40, 90), (28, 151), (125, 141), (136, 145), (90, 90), (81, 149), (76, 76), (29, 90), (20, 118), (105, 138), (89, 86), (145, 145), (37, 86), (130, 141), (21, 134), (77, 145), (123, 123), (141, 141), (65, 86), (96, 86), (43, 118), (139, 86), (48, 90), (59, 123), (30, 90), (58, 118), (70, 134), (1, 138)] current theta: 0.191145436292 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:58:08 2014 Optimize a model with 23257 rows, 23408 columns and 69616 nonzeros Presolve removed 20786 rows and 20797 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2471 rows, 2611 columns, 7247 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2611 integer (2611 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1906 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3297 simplex iterations) in 0.13 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [15, 36, 68, 83, 86, 87, 94, 95, 118, 123, 141, 143, 145, 147, 148, 151] edges [(137, 147), (16, 123), (18, 36), (12, 86), (11, 141), (111, 123), (127, 94), (99, 141), (78, 141), (22, 118), (15, 147), (107, 94), (90, 68), (62, 118), (42, 87), (54, 151), (30, 83), (32, 95), (120, 145), (101, 151), (60, 87), (86, 148), (113, 145), (38, 86), (3, 151), (10, 141), (151, 148), (92, 83), (6, 141), (98, 87), (124, 141), (4, 145), (48, 83), (109, 145), (140, 148), (81, 147), (115, 141), (36, 36), (110, 143), (29, 123), (135, 143), (70, 147), (148, 86), (129, 141), (89, 123), (64, 68), (126, 141), (74, 83), (84, 151), (83, 83), (118, 87), (50, 118), (97, 118), (102, 141), (9, 145), (128, 94), (76, 95), (49, 15), (122, 147), (31, 145), (79, 95), (25, 141), (19, 95), (27, 83), (142, 83), (24, 151), (108, 95), (133, 95), (67, 118), (72, 123), (117, 83), (53, 87), (132, 15), (121, 95), (75, 151), (17, 143), (55, 145), (112, 145), (34, 147), (100, 141), (149, 94), (5, 68), (33, 141), (73, 87), (88, 151), (80, 141), (106, 151), (14, 141), (116, 143), (63, 68), (104, 68), (8, 147), (114, 83), (40, 148), (56, 141), (134, 147), (45, 123), (87, 87), (39, 68), (85, 86), (46, 145), (2, 123), (119, 87), (105, 95), (26, 86), (61, 95), (68, 148), (143, 143), (44, 147), (91, 118), (66, 118), (147, 147), (28, 151), (21, 147), (52, 145), (125, 141), (136, 145), (150, 118), (7, 95), (51, 15), (65, 148), (20, 118), (146, 147), (145, 145), (37, 86), (69, 36), (71, 87), (130, 141), (57, 36), (82, 147), (93, 87), (138, 95), (95, 95), (131, 147), (77, 145), (123, 123), (141, 141), (58, 36), (144, 86), (96, 86), (35, 147), (139, 86), (47, 118), (1, 147), (41, 151), (59, 123), (23, 15), (94, 94), (0, 148), (13, 87), (43, 36), (103, 68)] current theta: 0.172030892663 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:58:08 2014 Optimize a model with 23257 rows, 23408 columns and 69616 nonzeros Presolve removed 21180 rows and 21208 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 2077 rows, 2200 columns, 6048 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2200 integer (2200 binary) Root relaxation: objective 7.105427e-15, 1904 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3222 simplex iterations) in 0.12 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [19, 28, 48, 56, 57, 59, 61, 65, 66, 74, 87, 96, 108, 110, 115, 147] edges [(66, 66), (137, 147), (65, 65), (72, 59), (61, 61), (25, 115), (55, 108), (79, 19), (99, 115), (127, 115), (102, 96), (141, 115), (38, 65), (48, 74), (18, 57), (75, 28), (42, 87), (145, 108), (45, 59), (125, 115), (49, 108), (115, 115), (84, 56), (129, 115), (101, 28), (143, 110), (13, 57), (112, 59), (133, 108), (142, 74), (113, 57), (31, 108), (11, 56), (109, 59), (98, 87), (139, 65), (77, 57), (81, 147), (149, 108), (10, 56), (95, 19), (50, 66), (74, 74), (94, 108), (2, 59), (70, 147), (24, 56), (30, 59), (41, 65), (59, 59), (7, 19), (90, 65), (5, 65), (4, 59), (16, 59), (63, 65), (85, 96), (92, 110), (43, 57), (88, 56), (14, 115), (20, 66), (111, 59), (107, 96), (46, 108), (123, 59), (114, 74), (121, 108), (62, 57), (122, 147), (96, 96), (100, 115), (36, 57), (47, 66), (128, 96), (132, 115), (116, 110), (23, 108), (83, 74), (120, 108), (27, 74), (58, 66), (105, 61), (64, 65), (53, 87), (69, 57), (37, 59), (138, 147), (34, 147), (130, 115), (126, 115), (32, 19), (151, 28), (108, 108), (22, 66), (71, 57), (104, 48), (40, 65), (73, 87), (86, 65), (136, 59), (39, 59), (76, 61), (8, 147), (134, 147), (87, 87), (19, 61), (140, 65), (78, 115), (0, 28), (51, 147), (135, 110), (124, 115), (52, 108), (103, 65), (119, 87), (117, 74), (144, 65), (80, 56), (89, 59), (44, 147), (147, 147), (57, 57), (28, 28), (150, 87), (17, 110), (21, 147), (33, 115), (15, 108), (146, 147), (3, 28), (54, 28), (106, 56), (29, 59), (26, 96), (82, 147), (93, 87), (91, 66), (131, 147), (6, 115), (110, 110), (35, 147), (1, 147), (118, 66), (12, 65), (68, 65), (97, 66), (9, 108), (67, 66), (60, 110), (148, 65), (56, 56)] current theta: 0.162473620848 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:58:08 2014 Optimize a model with 23257 rows, 23408 columns and 69616 nonzeros Presolve removed 21344 rows and 21379 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1913 rows, 2029 columns, 5549 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2029 integer (2029 binary) Root relaxation: objective -7.105427e-15, 1693 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 -0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2869 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [26, 27, 57, 75, 76, 84, 87, 90, 95, 97, 105, 115, 120, 123, 135, 147] edges [(12, 90), (137, 147), (83, 135), (16, 123), (31, 105), (25, 115), (27, 27), (47, 97), (111, 123), (74, 135), (39, 90), (99, 115), (149, 105), (141, 115), (28, 75), (56, 84), (136, 123), (104, 90), (18, 57), (105, 105), (19, 76), (42, 87), (117, 135), (125, 115), (101, 75), (89, 120), (68, 90), (88, 84), (115, 115), (63, 90), (32, 95), (129, 115), (94, 120), (140, 75), (142, 27), (24, 84), (121, 105), (113, 57), (110, 135), (98, 87), (151, 84), (107, 120), (85, 84), (77, 57), (81, 147), (26, 26), (10, 84), (103, 90), (84, 84), (23, 105), (70, 147), (114, 90), (50, 97), (54, 84), (3, 84), (86, 26), (143, 135), (118, 97), (60, 135), (41, 26), (43, 57), (14, 115), (66, 97), (20, 97), (97, 97), (38, 26), (62, 57), (122, 147), (100, 115), (79, 95), (36, 57), (132, 115), (37, 26), (148, 75), (80, 26), (72, 123), (53, 87), (46, 120), (69, 57), (96, 120), (116, 135), (51, 105), (34, 147), (130, 115), (126, 115), (128, 120), (102, 26), (71, 57), (58, 97), (73, 87), (11, 84), (15, 105), (44, 105), (106, 84), (17, 135), (109, 123), (120, 120), (8, 147), (22, 97), (134, 147), (45, 123), (139, 75), (87, 87), (55, 95), (78, 115), (7, 76), (124, 115), (0, 75), (127, 105), (2, 123), (119, 87), (135, 135), (61, 95), (48, 27), (9, 120), (92, 135), (144, 90), (147, 147), (65, 90), (57, 57), (40, 90), (150, 87), (21, 147), (4, 123), (49, 105), (91, 97), (90, 90), (76, 76), (33, 115), (29, 90), (146, 147), (138, 105), (75, 75), (67, 97), (82, 147), (93, 87), (95, 95), (108, 105), (131, 147), (64, 90), (123, 123), (6, 115), (35, 147), (1, 147), (145, 120), (59, 123), (13, 97), (30, 90), (5, 75), (133, 105), (52, 95), (112, 120)] current theta: 0.157694984941 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:58:08 2014 Optimize a model with 23257 rows, 23408 columns and 69616 nonzeros Presolve removed 21416 rows and 21458 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1841 rows, 1950 columns, 5326 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1950 integer (1950 binary) Root relaxation: objective -1.421085e-14, 1867 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 -0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3043 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [26, 27, 54, 57, 75, 79, 81, 87, 90, 91, 120, 123, 127, 135, 141, 145] edges [(70, 81), (12, 90), (128, 26), (82, 81), (83, 135), (7, 79), (32, 79), (16, 123), (3, 54), (11, 141), (27, 27), (58, 91), (111, 123), (74, 135), (95, 79), (39, 90), (99, 141), (21, 81), (78, 141), (136, 123), (104, 90), (18, 57), (127, 127), (42, 87), (28, 54), (41, 54), (117, 135), (101, 75), (89, 120), (68, 90), (54, 54), (63, 90), (120, 145), (94, 120), (140, 75), (142, 27), (1, 81), (113, 57), (110, 135), (6, 141), (98, 87), (107, 120), (106, 54), (15, 127), (118, 91), (109, 145), (77, 57), (51, 127), (115, 141), (26, 26), (66, 91), (103, 90), (50, 91), (129, 141), (114, 90), (126, 141), (79, 79), (86, 26), (19, 79), (143, 135), (138, 81), (96, 26), (102, 141), (9, 145), (8, 81), (60, 135), (43, 57), (105, 127), (151, 54), (134, 81), (47, 91), (38, 26), (62, 57), (31, 145), (25, 141), (36, 57), (81, 81), (84, 54), (37, 26), (148, 75), (132, 127), (72, 123), (53, 87), (69, 57), (55, 145), (116, 135), (112, 145), (85, 54), (100, 141), (76, 79), (71, 57), (67, 91), (61, 79), (33, 141), (73, 87), (124, 127), (80, 141), (149, 127), (14, 141), (17, 135), (10, 54), (147, 81), (56, 141), (133, 79), (108, 145), (45, 123), (139, 75), (87, 87), (91, 91), (121, 145), (46, 145), (122, 81), (0, 75), (2, 123), (119, 87), (97, 91), (135, 135), (48, 27), (92, 135), (146, 81), (144, 90), (65, 90), (57, 57), (40, 90), (150, 87), (24, 54), (52, 145), (4, 123), (125, 141), (90, 90), (34, 81), (131, 81), (44, 81), (29, 90), (145, 145), (130, 141), (75, 75), (93, 87), (64, 90), (123, 123), (141, 141), (137, 81), (13, 91), (20, 91), (88, 54), (22, 91), (59, 123), (49, 120), (30, 90), (5, 75), (23, 127), (35, 81)] current theta: 0.155305666987 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:58:09 2014 Optimize a model with 23257 rows, 23408 columns and 69616 nonzeros Presolve removed 21456 rows and 21505 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1801 rows, 1903 columns, 5199 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1903 integer (1903 binary) Root relaxation: objective -1.421085e-14, 1838 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 -0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2982 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [10, 27, 57, 64, 66, 75, 79, 81, 86, 87, 116, 123, 127, 128, 141, 145] edges [(66, 66), (70, 81), (41, 86), (82, 81), (7, 79), (32, 79), (16, 123), (24, 10), (151, 10), (12, 86), (68, 86), (11, 141), (27, 27), (117, 116), (111, 123), (95, 79), (86, 86), (28, 75), (99, 141), (21, 81), (78, 141), (136, 123), (114, 64), (116, 116), (18, 57), (127, 127), (42, 87), (88, 10), (101, 75), (54, 10), (90, 64), (92, 116), (135, 116), (140, 75), (142, 27), (1, 81), (107, 128), (38, 86), (49, 127), (84, 10), (113, 57), (6, 141), (98, 87), (15, 127), (17, 116), (77, 57), (51, 127), (115, 141), (50, 66), (29, 64), (64, 64), (129, 141), (103, 86), (126, 141), (79, 79), (19, 79), (138, 81), (53, 123), (13, 66), (102, 141), (9, 145), (8, 81), (83, 116), (43, 57), (20, 66), (89, 128), (105, 127), (134, 81), (3, 10), (62, 57), (144, 64), (110, 116), (31, 145), (25, 141), (36, 57), (47, 66), (81, 81), (30, 64), (128, 128), (58, 66), (148, 75), (132, 127), (72, 123), (69, 57), (55, 79), (112, 145), (22, 66), (100, 141), (76, 79), (71, 57), (61, 79), (10, 10), (33, 141), (73, 87), (124, 127), (104, 64), (80, 141), (149, 127), (14, 141), (109, 123), (60, 116), (147, 81), (56, 141), (133, 79), (63, 64), (108, 145), (45, 123), (139, 75), (87, 87), (143, 116), (121, 145), (85, 86), (120, 128), (46, 145), (39, 64), (122, 81), (0, 75), (2, 123), (119, 87), (26, 86), (48, 27), (40, 86), (106, 10), (146, 81), (57, 57), (150, 87), (52, 145), (4, 123), (125, 141), (34, 81), (131, 81), (44, 81), (145, 145), (37, 86), (74, 116), (130, 141), (75, 75), (93, 87), (91, 66), (123, 123), (141, 141), (65, 86), (137, 81), (94, 128), (118, 66), (97, 66), (59, 123), (96, 128), (67, 66), (5, 75), (23, 127), (35, 81)] current theta: 0.15411100801 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:58:09 2014 Optimize a model with 23257 rows, 23408 columns and 69616 nonzeros Presolve removed 21472 rows and 21523 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1785 rows, 1885 columns, 5149 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1885 integer (1885 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2184 iterations, 0.07 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2184 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.154708337499 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:58:09 2014 Optimize a model with 23257 rows, 23408 columns and 69616 nonzeros Presolve removed 21464 rows and 21514 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1793 rows, 1894 columns, 5174 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1894 integer (1894 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1800 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1800 simplex iterations) in 0.08 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [54, 57, 64, 66, 74, 75, 79, 81, 86, 87, 110, 120, 123, 127, 141, 145] edges [(66, 66), (70, 81), (82, 81), (15, 81), (7, 79), (32, 79), (16, 123), (12, 86), (68, 86), (3, 54), (11, 141), (111, 123), (95, 79), (86, 86), (28, 75), (99, 141), (21, 81), (78, 141), (136, 123), (48, 74), (114, 64), (18, 57), (127, 127), (42, 87), (41, 54), (101, 75), (89, 120), (54, 54), (90, 64), (120, 145), (94, 120), (143, 110), (140, 75), (1, 81), (38, 86), (142, 74), (49, 127), (113, 57), (6, 141), (98, 87), (107, 120), (106, 54), (4, 145), (109, 145), (77, 57), (51, 127), (115, 141), (50, 66), (29, 64), (64, 64), (43, 66), (74, 74), (129, 141), (103, 86), (126, 141), (79, 79), (19, 79), (138, 81), (53, 123), (13, 66), (102, 141), (9, 145), (8, 81), (92, 110), (20, 66), (105, 127), (151, 54), (134, 81), (62, 57), (144, 64), (31, 145), (25, 141), (36, 57), (47, 66), (81, 81), (116, 110), (30, 64), (84, 54), (83, 74), (27, 74), (58, 66), (148, 75), (132, 127), (72, 123), (69, 57), (96, 120), (55, 145), (112, 145), (128, 120), (85, 54), (22, 66), (100, 141), (76, 79), (71, 57), (61, 79), (33, 141), (73, 87), (124, 127), (104, 64), (80, 141), (149, 127), (14, 141), (10, 54), (147, 81), (56, 141), (133, 79), (63, 64), (108, 145), (45, 123), (139, 75), (87, 87), (121, 145), (135, 110), (46, 145), (39, 64), (122, 81), (0, 75), (2, 123), (119, 87), (117, 74), (26, 86), (40, 86), (146, 81), (57, 57), (150, 87), (17, 110), (24, 54), (52, 145), (125, 141), (34, 81), (131, 81), (44, 81), (145, 145), (37, 86), (130, 141), (75, 75), (93, 87), (91, 66), (123, 123), (141, 141), (110, 110), (65, 86), (137, 81), (118, 66), (88, 54), (97, 66), (59, 123), (67, 66), (5, 75), (23, 127), (60, 110), (35, 81)] current theta: 0.154409672755 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:58:09 2014 Optimize a model with 23257 rows, 23408 columns and 69616 nonzeros Presolve removed 21466 rows and 21516 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1791 rows, 1892 columns, 5168 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1892 integer (1892 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2044 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2044 simplex iterations) in 0.09 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.154559005127 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:58:09 2014 Optimize a model with 23257 rows, 23408 columns and 69616 nonzeros Presolve removed 21466 rows and 21516 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1791 rows, 1892 columns, 5168 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1892 integer (1892 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2044 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2044 simplex iterations) in 0.09 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.154633671313 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 23:58:10 2014 Optimize a model with 23257 rows, 23408 columns and 69616 nonzeros Presolve removed 21466 rows and 21516 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1791 rows, 1892 columns, 5168 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1892 integer (1892 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2044 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2044 simplex iterations) in 0.09 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap -