current theta: 0.696161680381 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:34:46 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 7620 rows and 7620 columns Presolve time: 0.48s Presolved: 20103 rows, 20268 columns, 60140 nonzeros Variable types: 0 continuous, 20268 integer (20268 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 2395 iterations, 0.15 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (4945 simplex iterations) in 0.89 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [5, 13, 17, 39, 40, 46, 48, 67, 68, 72, 91, 116, 122, 124, 150, 159, 164] edges [(13, 13), (5, 39), (155, 159), (108, 48), (130, 39), (114, 72), (140, 91), (56, 150), (4, 124), (92, 46), (118, 46), (49, 46), (26, 150), (83, 72), (110, 48), (75, 5), (88, 39), (165, 48), (113, 67), (81, 13), (24, 72), (160, 68), (84, 48), (143, 13), (119, 46), (149, 5), (137, 159), (78, 124), (77, 13), (47, 39), (148, 116), (62, 164), (136, 68), (70, 159), (89, 150), (64, 124), (159, 159), (25, 159), (42, 124), (10, 164), (105, 116), (124, 5), (15, 72), (32, 72), (50, 150), (151, 13), (35, 150), (132, 39), (109, 5), (54, 39), (34, 91), (51, 5), (129, 5), (44, 116), (19, 150), (157, 13), (40, 46), (72, 91), (12, 39), (100, 91), (74, 17), (63, 150), (121, 159), (11, 48), (158, 48), (91, 72), (6, 46), (30, 13), (107, 39), (57, 5), (101, 164), (127, 48), (142, 67), (80, 17), (52, 159), (111, 5), (112, 39), (104, 13), (2, 159), (139, 72), (131, 5), (144, 39), (125, 164), (38, 150), (53, 159), (58, 46), (134, 150), (117, 5), (102, 48), (1, 5), (90, 40), (45, 116), (59, 46), (94, 68), (150, 39), (86, 46), (68, 39), (8, 124), (146, 150), (28, 150), (164, 124), (67, 48), (60, 124), (33, 124), (29, 91), (22, 116), (103, 122), (87, 46), (85, 17), (37, 39), (163, 46), (133, 67), (145, 40), (21, 124), (106, 39), (97, 5), (154, 13), (31, 91), (18, 159), (39, 72), (3, 5), (16, 39), (123, 124), (65, 48), (120, 39), (126, 159), (152, 39), (153, 159), (69, 164), (36, 116), (76, 159), (95, 48), (14, 46), (20, 5), (128, 150), (9, 5), (23, 116), (73, 124), (66, 48), (156, 5), (55, 39), (162, 13), (98, 116), (147, 122), (141, 116), (48, 116), (122, 124), (96, 159), (43, 68), (7, 48), (41, 67), (82, 68), (99, 5), (71, 91), (17, 40), (93, 39), (79, 116), (46, 17), (61, 116), (27, 124), (116, 46), (115, 159), (138, 17), (135, 39), (0, 72), (161, 48)] current theta: 0.348080840191 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:34:47 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 20038 rows and 20038 columns Presolve time: 0.22s Presolved: 7685 rows, 7850 columns, 22886 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 7850 integer (7850 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1353 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3327 simplex iterations) in 0.33 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [9, 13, 21, 30, 53, 77, 79, 100, 101, 116, 123, 124, 128, 130, 137, 141, 165] edges [(63, 79), (84, 165), (9, 123), (39, 100), (16, 123), (23, 77), (73, 165), (32, 137), (62, 101), (58, 165), (67, 165), (153, 79), (113, 130), (103, 124), (132, 13), (4, 165), (75, 165), (116, 116), (157, 137), (28, 141), (101, 79), (44, 165), (106, 77), (134, 100), (80, 53), (122, 165), (129, 165), (91, 100), (136, 137), (92, 116), (66, 165), (27, 123), (2, 101), (121, 101), (13, 100), (164, 130), (47, 141), (139, 77), (49, 165), (149, 79), (112, 100), (150, 100), (144, 100), (86, 21), (141, 165), (17, 116), (50, 141), (83, 100), (135, 100), (30, 100), (14, 165), (6, 79), (3, 77), (19, 100), (114, 100), (98, 165), (109, 137), (148, 165), (65, 137), (5, 165), (12, 79), (54, 30), (102, 101), (79, 79), (76, 141), (142, 165), (111, 130), (155, 101), (128, 123), (41, 53), (31, 123), (34, 30), (78, 165), (38, 101), (69, 77), (97, 137), (85, 79), (20, 124), (61, 141), (152, 130), (133, 165), (11, 77), (146, 137), (21, 165), (57, 100), (1, 79), (71, 100), (140, 124), (120, 100), (99, 77), (82, 79), (138, 165), (115, 101), (25, 141), (94, 101), (108, 165), (68, 30), (77, 77), (15, 101), (53, 165), (104, 30), (147, 123), (119, 79), (46, 116), (43, 100), (18, 79), (159, 79), (143, 100), (37, 101), (126, 79), (87, 130), (60, 124), (64, 165), (127, 130), (10, 116), (160, 101), (110, 101), (165, 165), (145, 79), (35, 124), (8, 100), (48, 165), (81, 30), (59, 165), (154, 13), (130, 165), (124, 123), (107, 165), (93, 79), (158, 77), (29, 137), (88, 100), (36, 165), (137, 137), (125, 100), (118, 165), (24, 100), (95, 165), (117, 137), (151, 77), (105, 165), (0, 100), (96, 101), (156, 79), (56, 9), (52, 79), (51, 165), (22, 79), (7, 165), (100, 100), (161, 165), (55, 101), (42, 77), (26, 100), (74, 116), (70, 137), (33, 77), (72, 100), (123, 123), (131, 124), (163, 165), (45, 165), (90, 116), (89, 165), (40, 116), (162, 137)] current theta: 0.174040420095 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:34:48 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25070 rows and 25101 columns Presolve time: 0.05s Presolved: 2653 rows, 2787 columns, 7759 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2787 integer (2787 binary) Root relaxation: objective 1.421085e-14, 2041 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (4325 simplex iterations) in 0.15 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [46, 56, 64, 77, 82, 91, 92, 99, 118, 120, 127, 132, 133, 145, 156, 157, 165] edges [(59, 127), (84, 165), (74, 46), (144, 120), (73, 165), (76, 99), (61, 99), (20, 56), (85, 118), (126, 82), (139, 99), (8, 132), (4, 165), (75, 165), (3, 132), (131, 77), (68, 157), (135, 120), (161, 133), (117, 156), (122, 165), (152, 77), (39, 132), (134, 132), (146, 99), (77, 127), (12, 156), (38, 157), (66, 165), (101, 82), (113, 127), (35, 56), (128, 56), (42, 120), (93, 82), (99, 99), (9, 56), (60, 56), (79, 145), (82, 82), (123, 56), (70, 157), (22, 92), (58, 92), (138, 64), (102, 157), (106, 99), (40, 46), (72, 91), (11, 99), (100, 91), (43, 120), (14, 165), (64, 64), (124, 56), (98, 165), (41, 46), (148, 165), (31, 127), (5, 165), (67, 46), (92, 92), (142, 165), (46, 46), (78, 165), (10, 92), (7, 46), (17, 46), (26, 132), (129, 133), (109, 156), (86, 165), (127, 77), (104, 157), (115, 157), (164, 133), (69, 127), (21, 165), (65, 133), (112, 91), (155, 157), (34, 99), (55, 157), (19, 91), (136, 157), (44, 92), (154, 132), (130, 127), (80, 92), (108, 165), (53, 118), (132, 132), (47, 99), (118, 92), (162, 120), (97, 157), (140, 77), (24, 132), (114, 91), (165, 165), (159, 82), (57, 120), (103, 77), (52, 82), (150, 132), (1, 118), (160, 82), (49, 92), (33, 99), (110, 156), (91, 91), (133, 133), (149, 156), (88, 132), (119, 118), (121, 82), (16, 64), (83, 132), (158, 127), (157, 157), (156, 156), (95, 165), (107, 64), (125, 91), (81, 157), (15, 82), (120, 132), (147, 64), (151, 77), (54, 157), (143, 132), (105, 165), (29, 157), (0, 132), (51, 165), (27, 77), (111, 99), (137, 99), (6, 156), (94, 82), (50, 99), (71, 91), (28, 99), (30, 132), (63, 156), (2, 82), (145, 145), (25, 99), (32, 132), (96, 82), (87, 99), (36, 46), (23, 99), (18, 118), (37, 157), (13, 91), (90, 46), (163, 165), (45, 165), (141, 127), (62, 156), (116, 46), (153, 92), (89, 165), (56, 56), (48, 46)] current theta: 0.0870202100476 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:34:48 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 26656 rows and 26808 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1067 rows, 1080 columns, 2892 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1080 integer (1079 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1107 iterations, 0.01 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1107 simplex iterations) in 0.04 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.130530315071 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:34:48 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25950 rows and 26038 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1773 rows, 1850 columns, 5062 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1850 integer (1850 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1981 iterations, 0.03 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1981 simplex iterations) in 0.06 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.152285367583 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:34:48 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25516 rows and 25565 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2207 rows, 2323 columns, 6403 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2323 integer (2323 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 2158 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2158 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [22, 56, 59, 70, 72, 99, 103, 116, 121, 135, 142, 144, 145, 148, 152, 153, 156] edges [(97, 70), (127, 152), (86, 148), (37, 70), (114, 72), (76, 99), (102, 156), (61, 99), (81, 156), (20, 56), (151, 152), (39, 144), (75, 148), (67, 116), (118, 153), (140, 152), (69, 59), (139, 99), (64, 142), (19, 72), (116, 116), (93, 121), (77, 152), (130, 59), (117, 156), (161, 59), (146, 99), (95, 148), (12, 156), (68, 70), (35, 56), (128, 56), (104, 70), (99, 99), (105, 148), (9, 56), (66, 148), (44, 153), (79, 145), (123, 56), (154, 135), (58, 22), (16, 103), (53, 22), (17, 116), (106, 99), (2, 121), (11, 99), (60, 103), (90, 22), (91, 72), (124, 56), (85, 22), (121, 121), (147, 103), (43, 135), (22, 22), (45, 148), (59, 59), (10, 22), (1, 153), (7, 116), (92, 153), (70, 70), (113, 103), (125, 72), (108, 148), (94, 121), (41, 22), (155, 121), (141, 59), (34, 135), (31, 103), (109, 156), (78, 148), (5, 142), (129, 153), (80, 153), (164, 99), (111, 59), (74, 22), (162, 135), (88, 135), (51, 148), (138, 142), (157, 70), (103, 103), (87, 59), (46, 116), (136, 121), (47, 99), (21, 148), (115, 70), (165, 148), (148, 148), (84, 148), (26, 144), (30, 135), (153, 153), (27, 152), (152, 152), (82, 121), (159, 121), (18, 22), (89, 148), (160, 121), (72, 72), (100, 72), (107, 142), (119, 145), (4, 142), (54, 70), (33, 99), (110, 156), (24, 144), (149, 156), (133, 59), (122, 148), (71, 72), (36, 116), (55, 156), (156, 156), (29, 70), (135, 135), (150, 144), (163, 148), (15, 121), (131, 152), (101, 121), (48, 116), (158, 152), (52, 145), (112, 72), (73, 148), (65, 59), (96, 121), (83, 144), (137, 99), (6, 156), (50, 99), (28, 99), (13, 72), (63, 156), (145, 145), (144, 144), (25, 99), (143, 144), (14, 142), (134, 135), (120, 144), (8, 144), (38, 156), (132, 144), (3, 144), (23, 99), (0, 144), (42, 144), (98, 148), (126, 156), (142, 142), (62, 156), (57, 135), (40, 116), (49, 153), (56, 56), (32, 144)] current theta: 0.141407841327 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:34:49 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25712 rows and 25779 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2011 rows, 2109 columns, 5797 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2109 integer (2109 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2071 iterations, 0.03 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2071 simplex iterations) in 0.07 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.146846604455 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:34:49 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25628 rows and 25684 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2095 rows, 2204 columns, 6060 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2204 integer (2204 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2145 iterations, 0.04 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2145 simplex iterations) in 0.08 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.149565986019 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:34:49 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25572 rows and 25626 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2151 rows, 2262 columns, 6230 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2262 integer (2262 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2204 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2204 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.150925676801 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:34:49 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25546 rows and 25599 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2177 rows, 2289 columns, 6309 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2289 integer (2289 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2407 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2407 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.151605522192 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:34:49 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25532 rows and 25583 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2191 rows, 2305 columns, 6353 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2305 integer (2305 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2375 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2375 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.151945444888 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:34:49 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25526 rows and 25577 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2197 rows, 2311 columns, 6371 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2311 integer (2311 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2305 iterations, 0.07 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2305 simplex iterations) in 0.12 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.152115406236 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:34:50 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25522 rows and 25572 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2201 rows, 2316 columns, 6384 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2316 integer (2316 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2308 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2308 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.152200386909 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:34:50 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25520 rows and 25570 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2203 rows, 2318 columns, 6390 nonzeros Loaded MIP start with objective 0 Variable types: 0 continuous, 2318 integer (2318 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 195 iterations, 0.00 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 0.00000 -1.00000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (195 simplex iterations) in 0.05 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [22, 56, 59, 70, 72, 99, 103, 116, 121, 135, 142, 144, 145, 148, 152, 153, 156] edges [(97, 70), (127, 152), (86, 148), (37, 70), (114, 72), (76, 99), (102, 156), (61, 99), (81, 156), (20, 56), (151, 152), (39, 144), (75, 148), (67, 116), (118, 153), (140, 152), (69, 59), (139, 99), (64, 142), (19, 72), (116, 116), (93, 121), (77, 152), (130, 59), (117, 156), (161, 59), (146, 99), (95, 148), (12, 156), (68, 70), (35, 56), (128, 56), (104, 70), (99, 99), (105, 148), (9, 56), (66, 148), (44, 153), (79, 145), (123, 56), (154, 135), (58, 22), (16, 103), (53, 22), (17, 116), (106, 99), (2, 121), (11, 99), (60, 103), (90, 22), (91, 72), (124, 56), (85, 22), (121, 121), (147, 103), (43, 135), (22, 22), (45, 148), (59, 59), (10, 22), (1, 153), (7, 116), (92, 153), (70, 70), (113, 103), (125, 72), (108, 148), (94, 121), (41, 22), (155, 121), (141, 59), (34, 135), (31, 103), (109, 156), (78, 148), (5, 142), (129, 153), (80, 153), (164, 99), (111, 59), (74, 22), (162, 135), (88, 135), (51, 148), (138, 142), (157, 70), (103, 103), (87, 59), (46, 116), (136, 121), (47, 99), (21, 148), (115, 70), (165, 148), (148, 148), (84, 148), (26, 144), (30, 135), (153, 153), (27, 152), (152, 152), (82, 121), (159, 121), (18, 22), (89, 148), (160, 121), (72, 72), (100, 72), (107, 142), (119, 145), (4, 142), (54, 70), (33, 99), (110, 156), (24, 144), (149, 156), (133, 59), (122, 148), (71, 72), (36, 116), (55, 156), (156, 156), (29, 70), (135, 135), (150, 144), (163, 148), (15, 121), (131, 152), (101, 121), (48, 116), (158, 152), (52, 145), (112, 72), (73, 148), (65, 59), (96, 121), (83, 144), (137, 99), (6, 156), (50, 99), (28, 99), (13, 72), (63, 156), (145, 145), (144, 144), (25, 99), (143, 144), (14, 142), (134, 135), (120, 144), (8, 144), (38, 156), (132, 144), (3, 144), (23, 99), (0, 144), (42, 144), (98, 148), (126, 156), (142, 142), (62, 156), (57, 135), (40, 116), (49, 153), (56, 56), (32, 144)]