current theta: 0.669540661088 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:35:00 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 9408 rows and 9408 columns Presolve time: 0.45s Presolved: 18315 rows, 18480 columns, 54776 nonzeros Variable types: 0 continuous, 18480 integer (18480 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1564 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2998 simplex iterations) in 0.59 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [4, 13, 19, 22, 38, 48, 78, 79, 89, 94, 102, 118, 146, 156, 158, 161, 165] edges [(143, 146), (101, 156), (77, 79), (110, 161), (8, 156), (141, 156), (164, 118), (71, 161), (84, 161), (58, 165), (60, 102), (36, 94), (111, 156), (4, 156), (147, 38), (112, 165), (106, 161), (29, 156), (127, 165), (162, 118), (114, 156), (134, 165), (152, 19), (25, 161), (24, 22), (41, 19), (55, 165), (132, 156), (52, 158), (109, 161), (44, 161), (129, 165), (11, 156), (18, 94), (154, 146), (155, 102), (65, 165), (122, 161), (7, 156), (34, 102), (150, 161), (20, 165), (139, 165), (145, 156), (74, 165), (17, 156), (104, 165), (146, 161), (80, 156), (99, 161), (105, 156), (120, 161), (14, 165), (160, 38), (159, 118), (37, 161), (73, 102), (31, 165), (43, 19), (151, 38), (30, 22), (142, 94), (32, 22), (33, 79), (128, 161), (5, 22), (72, 161), (79, 118), (54, 102), (148, 94), (86, 165), (102, 118), (15, 118), (91, 165), (47, 161), (38, 118), (156, 19), (90, 165), (116, 146), (117, 118), (126, 22), (92, 102), (61, 22), (23, 79), (96, 165), (3, 165), (103, 19), (28, 102), (16, 22), (45, 38), (136, 94), (119, 102), (157, 94), (133, 102), (42, 161), (165, 165), (124, 165), (108, 38), (149, 94), (2, 161), (107, 161), (69, 118), (48, 165), (19, 165), (144, 156), (39, 22), (130, 165), (1, 156), (62, 165), (75, 22), (64, 156), (81, 165), (87, 156), (59, 156), (88, 94), (68, 118), (95, 165), (49, 156), (53, 161), (123, 165), (26, 38), (66, 156), (125, 38), (78, 38), (0, 165), (138, 78), (113, 22), (70, 165), (40, 165), (140, 38), (10, 38), (51, 165), (118, 118), (22, 79), (97, 156), (6, 156), (161, 165), (163, 156), (98, 156), (121, 161), (100, 161), (50, 156), (35, 165), (46, 102), (85, 102), (67, 156), (82, 118), (9, 165), (158, 165), (56, 165), (12, 165), (135, 165), (21, 102), (57, 156), (27, 89), (131, 161), (153, 102), (137, 161), (94, 165), (93, 78), (13, 156), (83, 19), (63, 165), (89, 165), (76, 156), (115, 89)] current theta: 0.334770330544 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:35:01 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 20826 rows and 20826 columns Presolve time: 0.18s Presolved: 6897 rows, 7062 columns, 20522 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 7062 integer (7062 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1312 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3584 simplex iterations) in 0.32 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [3, 15, 17, 19, 30, 38, 52, 64, 79, 93, 100, 102, 106, 115, 118, 132, 152] edges [(106, 3), (29, 132), (113, 17), (92, 132), (46, 118), (84, 52), (70, 3), (82, 102), (120, 106), (33, 93), (95, 106), (81, 106), (141, 152), (101, 132), (32, 17), (4, 132), (87, 93), (130, 106), (14, 106), (23, 102), (142, 93), (117, 19), (135, 19), (148, 93), (13, 132), (50, 132), (164, 102), (51, 115), (165, 106), (54, 64), (129, 106), (122, 106), (25, 106), (19, 30), (7, 152), (0, 106), (150, 100), (146, 132), (17, 93), (27, 115), (45, 132), (39, 93), (99, 132), (144, 30), (26, 30), (124, 106), (16, 17), (152, 93), (61, 93), (78, 30), (6, 17), (114, 132), (67, 132), (31, 3), (66, 132), (105, 132), (93, 93), (127, 19), (21, 38), (125, 118), (11, 132), (48, 106), (115, 30), (77, 93), (65, 106), (90, 30), (75, 152), (56, 19), (52, 52), (9, 106), (79, 118), (12, 106), (121, 100), (159, 17), (102, 118), (15, 118), (18, 17), (88, 19), (140, 64), (133, 17), (80, 132), (72, 106), (41, 132), (89, 106), (38, 118), (64, 15), (22, 93), (145, 132), (107, 100), (157, 152), (162, 93), (112, 132), (37, 30), (163, 79), (58, 93), (63, 30), (8, 93), (91, 106), (108, 17), (96, 100), (134, 19), (132, 132), (131, 106), (103, 132), (43, 30), (30, 19), (69, 30), (158, 106), (55, 106), (109, 19), (1, 132), (123, 100), (85, 17), (153, 15), (57, 132), (59, 132), (155, 132), (161, 106), (34, 132), (118, 102), (147, 152), (98, 93), (35, 100), (86, 100), (40, 152), (149, 152), (60, 19), (97, 132), (94, 106), (62, 100), (136, 17), (36, 93), (119, 132), (3, 106), (24, 152), (143, 93), (156, 79), (111, 132), (20, 106), (151, 115), (100, 100), (47, 3), (138, 118), (42, 115), (160, 102), (110, 106), (49, 64), (68, 152), (10, 132), (116, 38), (44, 106), (5, 132), (28, 132), (2, 100), (126, 152), (139, 115), (74, 132), (53, 100), (137, 52), (104, 106), (76, 64), (154, 64), (83, 93), (71, 106), (73, 132), (128, 106)] current theta: 0.167385165272 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:35:01 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25330 rows and 25367 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2393 rows, 2521 columns, 6973 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2521 integer (2521 binary) Root relaxation: objective -2.842171e-14, 1929 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 -0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3528 simplex iterations) in 0.15 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [42, 49, 50, 58, 64, 69, 82, 87, 89, 96, 99, 114, 134, 139, 149, 155, 159] edges [(8, 87), (37, 42), (165, 89), (106, 89), (24, 149), (50, 50), (17, 149), (23, 82), (22, 87), (74, 96), (78, 87), (57, 114), (122, 134), (65, 89), (79, 64), (46, 64), (73, 155), (67, 50), (40, 58), (15, 64), (127, 42), (133, 159), (121, 139), (5, 50), (19, 134), (159, 159), (146, 99), (148, 149), (117, 99), (41, 155), (163, 64), (89, 89), (56, 139), (130, 134), (25, 134), (53, 99), (49, 49), (99, 99), (31, 96), (91, 89), (113, 149), (82, 82), (9, 89), (30, 42), (55, 89), (143, 87), (87, 159), (98, 87), (33, 159), (18, 149), (138, 64), (52, 139), (132, 114), (32, 149), (68, 87), (77, 159), (47, 96), (135, 134), (64, 64), (2, 139), (69, 69), (84, 139), (60, 99), (111, 155), (164, 155), (14, 89), (81, 139), (156, 69), (0, 89), (149, 149), (42, 42), (26, 69), (72, 134), (83, 87), (158, 134), (7, 159), (71, 139), (88, 99), (137, 58), (118, 64), (147, 159), (16, 149), (101, 114), (107, 96), (125, 64), (62, 99), (153, 69), (145, 114), (116, 69), (4, 114), (96, 96), (86, 42), (20, 139), (34, 155), (128, 96), (13, 114), (119, 49), (162, 159), (154, 82), (6, 159), (108, 42), (120, 139), (90, 99), (136, 159), (3, 134), (134, 134), (105, 114), (1, 114), (103, 155), (29, 114), (44, 134), (58, 58), (109, 96), (48, 89), (93, 149), (126, 159), (160, 82), (59, 50), (114, 114), (10, 69), (12, 89), (39, 149), (141, 87), (76, 159), (94, 139), (104, 134), (43, 99), (102, 64), (157, 42), (80, 114), (61, 58), (161, 89), (51, 42), (129, 139), (144, 69), (100, 134), (97, 50), (142, 149), (38, 64), (95, 134), (92, 99), (54, 82), (124, 139), (140, 82), (11, 50), (66, 114), (27, 42), (151, 69), (63, 58), (75, 87), (70, 134), (36, 159), (21, 69), (123, 139), (28, 49), (115, 42), (45, 99), (131, 89), (139, 139), (35, 99), (150, 99), (155, 155), (152, 149), (112, 99), (110, 134), (85, 159)] current theta: 0.083692582636 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:35:02 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 26796 rows and 26953 columns Presolve time: 0.02s Presolved: 927 rows, 935 columns, 2473 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 935 integer (934 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 995 iterations, 0.01 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (995 simplex iterations) in 0.03 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.125538873954 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:35:02 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 26154 rows and 26256 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1569 rows, 1632 columns, 4436 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1632 integer (1632 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1768 iterations, 0.02 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1768 simplex iterations) in 0.06 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.146462019613 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:35:02 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25750 rows and 25817 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 1973 rows, 2071 columns, 5683 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2071 integer (2071 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2403 iterations, 0.07 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2403 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.156923592442 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:35:02 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25528 rows and 25583 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2195 rows, 2305 columns, 6361 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2305 integer (2305 binary) Root relaxation: objective 5.684342e-14, 2333 iterations, 0.07 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3790 simplex iterations) in 0.16 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [21, 41, 42, 46, 57, 61, 87, 91, 93, 95, 96, 99, 100, 114, 118, 121, 140] edges [(37, 42), (97, 57), (144, 99), (61, 61), (75, 42), (110, 95), (138, 140), (71, 121), (22, 87), (74, 96), (78, 87), (18, 61), (162, 87), (158, 100), (39, 61), (127, 42), (134, 100), (146, 99), (117, 99), (10, 21), (148, 93), (120, 91), (13, 57), (81, 121), (53, 99), (52, 121), (82, 140), (48, 91), (99, 99), (73, 41), (31, 96), (153, 21), (147, 87), (3, 100), (6, 87), (30, 42), (12, 91), (1, 57), (143, 87), (94, 100), (161, 91), (40, 121), (132, 114), (2, 121), (68, 87), (137, 121), (44, 91), (47, 96), (151, 42), (122, 91), (139, 121), (19, 100), (60, 99), (159, 87), (34, 41), (104, 91), (93, 93), (119, 41), (121, 121), (126, 87), (129, 91), (54, 140), (25, 91), (77, 93), (46, 46), (124, 91), (58, 61), (123, 121), (67, 57), (42, 42), (103, 41), (113, 93), (8, 61), (157, 87), (79, 118), (152, 61), (102, 118), (142, 61), (131, 91), (88, 99), (15, 118), (101, 114), (21, 21), (107, 96), (38, 118), (133, 87), (62, 99), (85, 87), (165, 91), (106, 91), (145, 114), (24, 93), (96, 96), (86, 42), (17, 61), (128, 96), (76, 87), (65, 91), (41, 41), (98, 61), (154, 140), (90, 99), (33, 87), (108, 87), (5, 41), (70, 100), (135, 95), (105, 114), (32, 93), (29, 114), (89, 91), (63, 121), (109, 96), (56, 121), (130, 100), (28, 41), (160, 140), (87, 87), (140, 140), (20, 121), (9, 91), (125, 46), (114, 114), (91, 91), (136, 87), (69, 21), (55, 91), (43, 99), (80, 114), (36, 93), (51, 42), (111, 41), (92, 99), (57, 57), (141, 42), (14, 91), (83, 61), (118, 118), (66, 114), (100, 100), (23, 140), (155, 41), (27, 42), (163, 118), (59, 57), (26, 42), (50, 41), (116, 140), (149, 93), (4, 57), (0, 91), (164, 21), (115, 42), (95, 95), (72, 100), (45, 99), (7, 87), (156, 21), (35, 99), (150, 99), (64, 46), (49, 21), (16, 61), (112, 99), (84, 121), (11, 57)] current theta: 0.151692806028 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:35:02 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25622 rows and 25681 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2101 rows, 2207 columns, 6075 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2207 integer (2207 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 2164 iterations, 0.07 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3558 simplex iterations) in 0.14 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [42, 46, 50, 58, 62, 71, 91, 96, 101, 102, 126, 133, 134, 140, 149, 153, 155] edges [(37, 42), (144, 153), (163, 102), (22, 126), (24, 149), (75, 42), (88, 62), (77, 133), (162, 133), (50, 50), (71, 71), (138, 140), (53, 62), (98, 133), (146, 62), (74, 96), (105, 101), (41, 50), (90, 62), (73, 155), (103, 50), (40, 58), (10, 153), (76, 140), (127, 42), (132, 101), (5, 50), (19, 134), (148, 149), (119, 155), (117, 62), (120, 91), (92, 62), (17, 133), (87, 126), (130, 134), (82, 140), (48, 91), (81, 71), (31, 96), (113, 149), (30, 42), (143, 133), (12, 91), (18, 149), (79, 102), (161, 91), (43, 62), (32, 149), (85, 133), (126, 133), (36, 149), (94, 71), (47, 96), (15, 102), (70, 62), (122, 91), (135, 134), (111, 155), (8, 133), (164, 155), (104, 91), (45, 62), (4, 101), (150, 62), (129, 91), (121, 71), (54, 140), (25, 91), (46, 46), (159, 126), (124, 91), (149, 149), (42, 42), (72, 134), (158, 134), (21, 153), (66, 101), (131, 91), (137, 58), (16, 149), (107, 96), (151, 153), (83, 133), (57, 50), (165, 91), (106, 91), (96, 96), (156, 153), (86, 42), (133, 126), (34, 155), (97, 101), (128, 96), (65, 91), (154, 140), (102, 102), (64, 102), (123, 71), (108, 42), (114, 101), (3, 134), (153, 153), (6, 126), (38, 102), (134, 134), (89, 91), (44, 134), (58, 58), (109, 96), (118, 102), (60, 62), (160, 140), (20, 71), (93, 149), (80, 101), (59, 50), (140, 140), (33, 133), (9, 91), (125, 46), (56, 71), (69, 153), (91, 91), (29, 101), (35, 62), (39, 149), (52, 71), (62, 62), (55, 91), (157, 42), (61, 58), (1, 101), (28, 155), (51, 42), (100, 134), (68, 126), (142, 149), (139, 71), (95, 134), (141, 42), (78, 42), (14, 91), (7, 126), (101, 101), (11, 50), (147, 126), (99, 62), (23, 140), (27, 42), (63, 58), (26, 42), (49, 155), (116, 140), (0, 91), (115, 42), (136, 133), (13, 101), (67, 101), (145, 101), (2, 71), (112, 62), (155, 155), (152, 149), (84, 71), (110, 134)] current theta: 0.14907741282 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:35:02 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25686 rows and 25751 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2037 rows, 2137 columns, 5877 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2137 integer (2137 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 2450 iterations, 0.08 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3829 simplex iterations) in 0.15 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [20, 23, 24, 42, 57, 63, 69, 74, 76, 91, 95, 100, 102, 111, 133, 150, 164] edges [(37, 42), (154, 76), (97, 57), (160, 76), (163, 102), (61, 24), (75, 42), (77, 133), (162, 133), (110, 95), (17, 24), (98, 133), (93, 24), (124, 20), (158, 100), (39, 24), (127, 42), (18, 24), (105, 74), (80, 74), (73, 111), (54, 76), (90, 150), (120, 91), (33, 76), (13, 57), (23, 23), (85, 76), (136, 76), (48, 91), (113, 24), (71, 20), (107, 74), (125, 102), (101, 57), (35, 150), (3, 100), (87, 76), (137, 63), (30, 42), (143, 133), (12, 91), (1, 57), (52, 63), (81, 20), (119, 111), (94, 100), (45, 150), (79, 102), (161, 91), (126, 133), (150, 150), (159, 76), (44, 91), (15, 102), (122, 91), (60, 150), (74, 74), (6, 133), (69, 69), (19, 100), (8, 133), (104, 91), (140, 76), (109, 74), (49, 111), (129, 91), (25, 91), (88, 150), (67, 57), (42, 42), (40, 63), (26, 69), (29, 57), (152, 24), (138, 23), (62, 150), (46, 23), (142, 24), (131, 91), (47, 95), (103, 111), (83, 133), (43, 150), (153, 69), (165, 91), (106, 91), (148, 24), (86, 42), (123, 63), (117, 150), (65, 91), (63, 63), (146, 150), (53, 150), (116, 23), (102, 102), (156, 164), (64, 102), (108, 42), (149, 24), (70, 100), (38, 102), (164, 164), (135, 95), (20, 20), (5, 111), (24, 24), (99, 150), (31, 95), (89, 91), (56, 20), (41, 111), (132, 57), (96, 74), (92, 150), (118, 102), (130, 20), (128, 95), (91, 91), (133, 133), (68, 76), (10, 69), (50, 57), (7, 76), (28, 111), (84, 20), (32, 24), (55, 91), (82, 76), (157, 42), (51, 42), (144, 69), (57, 57), (141, 42), (78, 42), (14, 91), (155, 111), (139, 20), (114, 57), (100, 100), (76, 76), (22, 133), (145, 74), (27, 42), (151, 69), (59, 57), (121, 20), (111, 111), (58, 63), (9, 20), (147, 76), (112, 150), (4, 57), (21, 69), (0, 91), (115, 42), (95, 95), (72, 100), (66, 74), (2, 20), (134, 95), (16, 24), (34, 164), (36, 24), (11, 57)] current theta: 0.147769716217 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:35:03 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25716 rows and 25782 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2007 rows, 2106 columns, 5786 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2106 integer (2106 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2323 iterations, 0.08 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2323 simplex iterations) in 0.12 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.148423564518 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:35:03 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25706 rows and 25772 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2017 rows, 2116 columns, 5816 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2116 integer (2116 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2357 iterations, 0.07 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2357 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.148750488669 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:35:03 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25696 rows and 25761 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2027 rows, 2127 columns, 5847 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2127 integer (2127 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2416 iterations, 0.08 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2416 simplex iterations) in 0.12 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.148913950745 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:35:03 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25690 rows and 25755 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2033 rows, 2133 columns, 5865 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2133 integer (2133 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2212 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2212 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.148995681783 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:35:04 2014 Optimize a model with 27723 rows, 27888 columns and 83000 nonzeros Presolve removed 25688 rows and 25753 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2035 rows, 2135 columns, 5871 nonzeros Loaded MIP start with objective 0 Variable types: 0 continuous, 2135 integer (2135 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 66 iterations, 0.00 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 0.00000 -1.00000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (66 simplex iterations) in 0.04 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [20, 23, 24, 42, 57, 63, 69, 74, 76, 91, 95, 100, 102, 111, 133, 150, 164] edges [(37, 42), (154, 76), (97, 57), (160, 76), (163, 102), (61, 24), (75, 42), (77, 133), (162, 133), (110, 95), (17, 24), (98, 133), (93, 24), (124, 20), (158, 100), (39, 24), (127, 42), (18, 24), (105, 74), (80, 74), (73, 111), (54, 76), (90, 150), (120, 91), (33, 76), (13, 57), (23, 23), (85, 76), (136, 76), (48, 91), (113, 24), (71, 20), (107, 74), (125, 102), (101, 57), (35, 150), (3, 100), (87, 76), (137, 63), (30, 42), (143, 133), (12, 91), (1, 57), (52, 63), (81, 20), (119, 111), (94, 100), (45, 150), (79, 102), (161, 91), (126, 133), (150, 150), (159, 76), (44, 91), (15, 102), (122, 91), (60, 150), (74, 74), (6, 133), (69, 69), (19, 100), (8, 133), (104, 91), (140, 76), (109, 74), (49, 111), (129, 91), (25, 91), (88, 150), (67, 57), (42, 42), (40, 63), (26, 69), (29, 57), (152, 24), (138, 23), (62, 150), (46, 23), (142, 24), (131, 91), (47, 95), (103, 111), (83, 133), (43, 150), (153, 69), (165, 91), (106, 91), (148, 24), (86, 42), (123, 63), (117, 150), (65, 91), (63, 63), (146, 150), (53, 150), (116, 23), (102, 102), (156, 164), (64, 102), (108, 42), (149, 24), (70, 100), (38, 102), (164, 164), (135, 95), (20, 20), (5, 111), (24, 24), (99, 150), (31, 95), (89, 91), (56, 20), (41, 111), (132, 57), (96, 74), (92, 150), (118, 102), (130, 20), (128, 95), (91, 91), (133, 133), (68, 76), (10, 69), (50, 57), (7, 76), (28, 111), (84, 20), (32, 24), (55, 91), (82, 76), (157, 42), (51, 42), (144, 69), (57, 57), (141, 42), (78, 42), (14, 91), (155, 111), (139, 20), (114, 57), (100, 100), (76, 76), (22, 133), (145, 74), (27, 42), (151, 69), (59, 57), (121, 20), (111, 111), (58, 63), (9, 20), (147, 76), (112, 150), (4, 57), (21, 69), (0, 91), (115, 42), (95, 95), (72, 100), (66, 74), (2, 20), (134, 95), (16, 24), (34, 164), (36, 24), (11, 57)]