current theta: 0.653644235335 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 21:25:41 2014 Optimize a model with 10101 rows, 10200 columns and 30200 nonzeros Presolve removed 3224 rows and 3224 columns Presolve time: 0.16s Presolved: 6877 rows, 6976 columns, 20528 nonzeros Variable types: 0 continuous, 6976 integer (6976 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 937 iterations, 0.03 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2032 simplex iterations) in 0.24 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [19, 28, 29, 51, 53, 63, 73, 82, 87, 92] edges [(16, 29), (81, 82), (51, 28), (59, 82), (82, 53), (47, 19), (40, 82), (87, 63), (94, 63), (46, 28), (18, 82), (17, 82), (36, 63), (7, 29), (26, 73), (1, 63), (52, 29), (14, 73), (57, 82), (86, 82), (6, 19), (2, 82), (93, 28), (69, 19), (27, 82), (83, 87), (23, 82), (62, 82), (84, 73), (78, 87), (12, 82), (63, 63), (95, 29), (25, 82), (56, 82), (67, 82), (38, 29), (70, 63), (21, 82), (24, 53), (34, 82), (92, 19), (76, 82), (35, 19), (33, 82), (68, 92), (79, 28), (0, 82), (28, 29), (73, 73), (44, 87), (10, 82), (4, 82), (29, 92), (74, 29), (61, 51), (22, 63), (15, 53), (85, 19), (13, 28), (90, 63), (55, 73), (64, 29), (31, 82), (80, 87), (99, 73), (11, 82), (32, 92), (89, 29), (88, 82), (58, 63), (39, 82), (53, 82), (48, 82), (66, 82), (3, 87), (96, 82), (41, 53), (30, 82), (97, 73), (45, 29), (75, 63), (54, 19), (37, 82), (98, 51), (50, 82), (91, 29), (43, 82), (20, 53), (71, 82), (65, 29), (60, 73), (72, 82), (9, 63), (8, 82), (49, 82), (77, 63), (42, 63), (5, 73), (19, 63)] current theta: 0.326822117667 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 21:25:41 2014 Optimize a model with 10101 rows, 10200 columns and 30200 nonzeros Presolve removed 7656 rows and 7658 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2445 rows, 2542 columns, 7230 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2542 integer (2542 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1039 iterations, 0.03 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1932 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [12, 17, 31, 73, 90, 92, 94, 96, 98, 99] edges [(14, 90), (12, 90), (48, 98), (19, 90), (30, 94), (80, 90), (76, 98), (75, 90), (1, 96), (96, 96), (20, 99), (0, 31), (29, 96), (17, 98), (71, 96), (46, 90), (72, 90), (64, 96), (84, 99), (43, 98), (61, 98), (69, 90), (51, 99), (10, 96), (44, 90), (6, 90), (79, 99), (92, 12), (57, 31), (54, 92), (32, 96), (39, 90), (74, 96), (7, 96), (47, 99), (41, 94), (89, 96), (35, 90), (11, 94), (85, 92), (40, 96), (60, 99), (73, 73), (37, 98), (36, 12), (82, 96), (90, 90), (27, 99), (15, 98), (5, 99), (22, 92), (50, 96), (62, 90), (58, 99), (38, 94), (65, 92), (4, 96), (8, 99), (59, 96), (18, 99), (2, 96), (25, 98), (95, 96), (26, 99), (70, 90), (78, 92), (21, 90), (63, 90), (68, 96), (28, 92), (49, 98), (67, 96), (55, 99), (13, 94), (31, 17), (93, 98), (86, 31), (91, 96), (98, 98), (87, 90), (77, 96), (53, 98), (16, 96), (88, 99), (45, 96), (3, 99), (83, 90), (66, 99), (94, 94), (56, 98), (99, 99), (33, 99), (34, 98), (52, 96), (42, 90), (23, 90), (9, 90), (24, 98), (97, 99), (81, 96)] current theta: 0.163411058834 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 21:25:41 2014 Optimize a model with 10101 rows, 10200 columns and 30200 nonzeros Presolve removed 9236 rows and 9314 columns Presolve time: 0.01s Presolved: 865 rows, 886 columns, 2414 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 886 integer (886 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1015 iterations, 0.01 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1015 simplex iterations) in 0.02 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.245116588251 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 21:25:41 2014 Optimize a model with 10101 rows, 10200 columns and 30200 nonzeros Presolve removed 8524 rows and 8535 columns Presolve time: 0.02s Presolved: 1577 rows, 1665 columns, 4617 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1665 integer (1665 binary) Root relaxation: objective -3.552714e-15, 1342 iterations, 0.03 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 -0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2618 simplex iterations) in 0.07 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [6, 30, 32, 45, 46, 55, 56, 95, 97, 98] edges [(75, 97), (19, 6), (48, 98), (65, 46), (20, 97), (62, 97), (73, 55), (4, 45), (45, 45), (76, 98), (8, 97), (39, 95), (99, 55), (35, 6), (95, 95), (17, 98), (74, 45), (92, 46), (40, 45), (43, 98), (61, 98), (36, 6), (54, 95), (85, 95), (97, 97), (70, 6), (71, 95), (60, 97), (41, 97), (27, 97), (57, 56), (80, 6), (47, 6), (78, 6), (79, 56), (67, 45), (42, 6), (91, 95), (18, 56), (52, 45), (37, 98), (16, 45), (15, 98), (83, 6), (63, 6), (96, 95), (77, 95), (9, 46), (82, 95), (68, 45), (5, 97), (38, 95), (1, 95), (46, 46), (25, 98), (58, 97), (84, 56), (87, 6), (32, 95), (69, 6), (26, 97), (49, 98), (23, 97), (0, 56), (81, 30), (90, 6), (51, 56), (93, 98), (72, 46), (21, 46), (2, 45), (98, 98), (28, 95), (88, 97), (30, 32), (50, 32), (55, 55), (89, 45), (44, 46), (22, 46), (53, 98), (86, 97), (59, 95), (6, 6), (10, 30), (64, 32), (11, 32), (3, 6), (13, 97), (12, 46), (66, 56), (14, 6), (94, 95), (34, 98), (31, 98), (33, 55), (29, 45), (24, 98), (56, 56), (7, 32)] current theta: 0.204263823542 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 21:25:41 2014 Optimize a model with 10101 rows, 10200 columns and 30200 nonzeros Presolve removed 8912 rows and 8941 columns Presolve time: 0.02s Presolved: 1189 rows, 1259 columns, 3435 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1259 integer (1259 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1362 iterations, 0.02 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1362 simplex iterations) in 0.04 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.224690205896 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 21:25:41 2014 Optimize a model with 10101 rows, 10200 columns and 30200 nonzeros Presolve removed 8750 rows and 8769 columns Presolve time: 0.02s Presolved: 1351 rows, 1431 columns, 3931 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1431 integer (1431 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1180 iterations, 0.02 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1180 simplex iterations) in 0.04 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [16, 17, 21, 28, 36, 48, 51, 55, 60, 96] edges [(76, 17), (26, 60), (73, 55), (57, 48), (65, 21), (0, 51), (87, 21), (99, 55), (79, 51), (27, 60), (80, 36), (71, 96), (66, 51), (29, 16), (11, 60), (24, 48), (53, 48), (64, 96), (62, 60), (35, 36), (97, 60), (37, 48), (70, 36), (43, 48), (32, 28), (92, 16), (94, 28), (34, 48), (23, 36), (74, 96), (60, 51), (36, 36), (78, 36), (42, 36), (44, 28), (17, 48), (89, 96), (95, 28), (28, 28), (39, 28), (1, 28), (40, 96), (30, 17), (12, 21), (38, 60), (47, 36), (84, 51), (93, 48), (22, 16), (19, 21), (51, 51), (48, 48), (50, 96), (4, 96), (9, 21), (59, 96), (25, 48), (7, 17), (61, 48), (83, 36), (54, 28), (2, 96), (67, 16), (69, 36), (58, 60), (31, 48), (13, 60), (75, 60), (15, 48), (90, 36), (8, 60), (18, 51), (3, 36), (72, 21), (85, 28), (98, 48), (88, 51), (91, 28), (6, 36), (63, 21), (55, 55), (56, 51), (46, 21), (10, 17), (5, 60), (14, 36), (96, 16), (16, 96), (45, 96), (49, 48), (82, 28), (77, 28), (21, 21), (68, 16), (52, 96), (41, 60), (33, 55), (86, 60), (81, 96), (20, 51)] current theta: 0.214477014719 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 21:25:42 2014 Optimize a model with 10101 rows, 10200 columns and 30200 nonzeros Presolve removed 8834 rows and 8857 columns Presolve time: 0.02s Presolved: 1267 rows, 1343 columns, 3675 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1343 integer (1343 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1314 iterations, 0.03 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2961 simplex iterations) in 0.07 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [2, 42, 48, 51, 55, 60, 81, 83, 92, 94] edges [(44, 94), (12, 42), (26, 60), (88, 60), (35, 83), (39, 92), (63, 42), (73, 55), (57, 48), (0, 51), (36, 83), (99, 55), (4, 2), (79, 51), (27, 60), (17, 81), (78, 83), (66, 51), (9, 92), (11, 60), (24, 48), (90, 83), (53, 48), (23, 83), (62, 60), (67, 2), (97, 60), (37, 48), (43, 48), (2, 2), (81, 81), (54, 92), (34, 48), (6, 42), (16, 92), (19, 42), (76, 81), (85, 94), (96, 2), (95, 94), (80, 83), (68, 92), (46, 92), (38, 60), (3, 83), (14, 83), (84, 51), (93, 48), (22, 92), (51, 51), (82, 94), (48, 48), (89, 2), (91, 94), (92, 92), (29, 2), (10, 81), (65, 92), (25, 48), (61, 48), (83, 83), (5, 51), (58, 60), (31, 48), (72, 42), (77, 92), (32, 94), (13, 60), (75, 60), (45, 2), (15, 48), (8, 60), (87, 42), (42, 42), (18, 51), (1, 92), (71, 81), (52, 81), (30, 81), (98, 48), (28, 94), (47, 83), (60, 60), (74, 2), (50, 81), (55, 55), (56, 51), (7, 81), (49, 48), (69, 83), (94, 94), (21, 42), (59, 81), (41, 60), (70, 83), (40, 2), (33, 55), (86, 60), (64, 81), (20, 51)] current theta: 0.209370419131 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 21:25:42 2014 Optimize a model with 10101 rows, 10200 columns and 30200 nonzeros Presolve removed 8862 rows and 8885 columns Presolve time: 0.02s Presolved: 1239 rows, 1315 columns, 3591 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1315 integer (1315 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1078 iterations, 0.02 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1078 simplex iterations) in 0.04 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [2, 42, 48, 55, 60, 79, 81, 83, 92, 94] edges [(44, 94), (12, 42), (26, 60), (88, 60), (35, 83), (63, 42), (73, 55), (20, 79), (36, 83), (99, 55), (4, 2), (27, 60), (39, 94), (17, 81), (78, 83), (9, 92), (11, 60), (24, 48), (90, 83), (84, 79), (54, 94), (53, 48), (23, 83), (62, 60), (67, 2), (56, 79), (97, 60), (37, 48), (43, 48), (2, 2), (81, 81), (18, 79), (34, 48), (6, 42), (16, 92), (19, 42), (76, 81), (85, 94), (96, 2), (95, 94), (80, 83), (46, 92), (0, 79), (3, 83), (14, 83), (93, 48), (22, 92), (82, 94), (48, 48), (89, 2), (91, 94), (92, 92), (29, 2), (10, 81), (38, 94), (65, 92), (79, 79), (25, 48), (77, 94), (61, 48), (83, 83), (68, 2), (58, 60), (31, 48), (72, 42), (66, 79), (32, 94), (13, 60), (75, 60), (45, 2), (15, 48), (8, 60), (87, 42), (42, 42), (1, 92), (71, 81), (52, 81), (30, 81), (98, 48), (28, 94), (47, 83), (60, 60), (74, 2), (5, 79), (51, 79), (50, 81), (55, 55), (7, 81), (49, 48), (69, 83), (94, 94), (21, 42), (59, 81), (41, 60), (70, 83), (40, 2), (33, 55), (86, 60), (64, 81), (57, 79)] current theta: 0.206817121336 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 21:25:42 2014 Optimize a model with 10101 rows, 10200 columns and 30200 nonzeros Presolve removed 8888 rows and 8913 columns Presolve time: 0.02s Presolved: 1213 rows, 1287 columns, 3511 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1287 integer (1287 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1099 iterations, 0.02 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1099 simplex iterations) in 0.04 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [2, 33, 42, 51, 75, 81, 82, 83, 92, 93] edges [(34, 93), (12, 42), (35, 83), (63, 42), (24, 93), (93, 93), (0, 51), (36, 83), (4, 2), (79, 51), (62, 75), (13, 82), (17, 81), (66, 51), (9, 92), (86, 82), (90, 83), (23, 83), (15, 93), (67, 2), (97, 75), (61, 93), (2, 2), (81, 81), (54, 92), (6, 42), (16, 92), (33, 33), (27, 75), (55, 33), (19, 42), (8, 51), (76, 81), (96, 2), (28, 75), (94, 75), (80, 83), (68, 92), (46, 92), (3, 83), (14, 83), (84, 51), (95, 82), (22, 92), (99, 33), (51, 51), (74, 82), (89, 2), (92, 92), (43, 93), (29, 2), (10, 81), (65, 92), (11, 82), (31, 93), (83, 83), (73, 33), (5, 51), (72, 42), (77, 92), (30, 82), (45, 2), (75, 75), (58, 75), (87, 42), (42, 42), (18, 51), (38, 82), (1, 92), (71, 81), (52, 81), (88, 51), (47, 83), (53, 93), (32, 82), (25, 93), (50, 81), (56, 51), (39, 75), (49, 93), (44, 75), (7, 81), (78, 75), (85, 75), (37, 93), (98, 93), (26, 51), (69, 83), (41, 82), (21, 42), (59, 81), (82, 82), (48, 93), (70, 83), (40, 2), (64, 81), (60, 75), (57, 51), (91, 82), (20, 51)] current theta: 0.205540472439 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 21:25:42 2014 Optimize a model with 10101 rows, 10200 columns and 30200 nonzeros Presolve removed 8902 rows and 8928 columns Presolve time: 0.02s Presolved: 1199 rows, 1272 columns, 3468 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1272 integer (1272 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1222 iterations, 0.02 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1222 simplex iterations) in 0.04 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [2, 42, 48, 51, 55, 75, 81, 82, 83, 92] edges [(12, 42), (35, 83), (39, 92), (63, 42), (73, 55), (0, 51), (99, 55), (4, 2), (79, 51), (62, 75), (13, 82), (17, 81), (66, 51), (9, 92), (86, 82), (24, 48), (90, 83), (53, 48), (23, 83), (67, 2), (37, 48), (97, 75), (43, 48), (2, 2), (81, 81), (54, 92), (34, 48), (6, 42), (16, 92), (27, 75), (19, 42), (8, 51), (76, 81), (96, 2), (28, 75), (94, 75), (80, 83), (46, 92), (3, 83), (14, 83), (84, 51), (93, 48), (95, 82), (22, 92), (51, 51), (74, 82), (48, 48), (89, 2), (92, 92), (29, 2), (10, 81), (65, 92), (25, 48), (11, 82), (61, 48), (83, 83), (68, 2), (5, 51), (31, 48), (72, 42), (77, 92), (30, 82), (45, 2), (15, 48), (75, 75), (58, 75), (87, 42), (42, 42), (18, 51), (38, 82), (1, 92), (71, 81), (52, 81), (98, 48), (88, 51), (47, 83), (32, 82), (36, 42), (50, 81), (55, 55), (56, 51), (44, 75), (7, 81), (78, 75), (85, 75), (49, 48), (26, 51), (69, 83), (41, 82), (21, 42), (59, 81), (82, 82), (70, 83), (40, 2), (33, 55), (64, 81), (60, 75), (57, 51), (91, 82), (20, 51)] current theta: 0.204902147991 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 21:25:42 2014 Optimize a model with 10101 rows, 10200 columns and 30200 nonzeros Presolve removed 8906 rows and 8932 columns Presolve time: 0.02s Presolved: 1195 rows, 1268 columns, 3456 nonzeros Loaded MIP start with objective 0 Variable types: 0 continuous, 1268 integer (1268 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 27 iterations, 0.00 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 0.00000 -1.00000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (27 simplex iterations) in 0.02 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [2, 42, 48, 51, 55, 75, 81, 82, 83, 92] edges [(12, 42), (35, 83), (39, 92), (63, 42), (73, 55), (0, 51), (99, 55), (4, 2), (79, 51), (62, 75), (13, 82), (17, 81), (66, 51), (9, 92), (86, 82), (24, 48), (90, 83), (53, 48), (23, 83), (67, 2), (37, 48), (97, 75), (43, 48), (2, 2), (81, 81), (54, 92), (34, 48), (6, 42), (16, 92), (27, 75), (19, 42), (8, 51), (76, 81), (96, 2), (28, 75), (94, 75), (80, 83), (46, 92), (3, 83), (14, 83), (84, 51), (93, 48), (95, 82), (22, 92), (51, 51), (74, 82), (48, 48), (89, 2), (92, 92), (29, 2), (10, 81), (65, 92), (25, 48), (11, 82), (61, 48), (83, 83), (68, 2), (5, 51), (31, 48), (72, 42), (77, 92), (30, 82), (45, 2), (15, 48), (75, 75), (58, 75), (87, 42), (42, 42), (18, 51), (38, 82), (1, 92), (71, 81), (52, 81), (98, 48), (88, 51), (47, 83), (32, 82), (36, 42), (50, 81), (55, 55), (56, 51), (44, 75), (7, 81), (78, 75), (85, 75), (49, 48), (26, 51), (69, 83), (41, 82), (21, 42), (59, 81), (82, 82), (70, 83), (40, 2), (33, 55), (64, 81), (60, 75), (57, 51), (91, 82), (20, 51)] current theta: 0.204582985766 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 21:25:42 2014 Optimize a model with 10101 rows, 10200 columns and 30200 nonzeros Presolve removed 8910 rows and 8938 columns Presolve time: 0.02s Presolved: 1191 rows, 1262 columns, 3442 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1262 integer (1262 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1248 iterations, 0.02 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1248 simplex iterations) in 0.04 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.204742566879 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 21:25:42 2014 Optimize a model with 10101 rows, 10200 columns and 30200 nonzeros Presolve removed 8910 rows and 8938 columns Presolve time: 0.02s Presolved: 1191 rows, 1262 columns, 3442 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1262 integer (1262 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1248 iterations, 0.02 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1248 simplex iterations) in 0.04 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.204822357435 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 21:25:42 2014 Optimize a model with 10101 rows, 10200 columns and 30200 nonzeros Presolve removed 8908 rows and 8935 columns Presolve time: 0.02s Presolved: 1193 rows, 1265 columns, 3449 nonzeros Loaded MIP start with objective 0 Variable types: 0 continuous, 1265 integer (1265 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 28 iterations, 0.00 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 0.00000 -1.00000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (28 simplex iterations) in 0.02 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [2, 42, 48, 51, 55, 75, 81, 82, 83, 92] edges [(12, 42), (35, 83), (39, 92), (63, 42), (73, 55), (0, 51), (99, 55), (4, 2), (79, 51), (62, 75), (13, 82), (17, 81), (66, 51), (9, 92), (86, 82), (24, 48), (90, 83), (53, 48), (23, 83), (67, 2), (37, 48), (97, 75), (43, 48), (2, 2), (81, 81), (54, 92), (34, 48), (6, 42), (16, 92), (27, 75), (19, 42), (8, 51), (76, 81), (96, 2), (28, 75), (94, 75), (80, 83), (46, 92), (3, 83), (14, 83), (84, 51), (93, 48), (95, 82), (22, 92), (51, 51), (74, 82), (48, 48), (89, 2), (92, 92), (29, 2), (10, 81), (65, 92), (25, 48), (11, 82), (61, 48), (83, 83), (68, 2), (5, 51), (31, 48), (72, 42), (77, 92), (30, 82), (45, 2), (15, 48), (75, 75), (58, 75), (87, 42), (42, 42), (18, 51), (38, 82), (1, 92), (71, 81), (52, 81), (98, 48), (88, 51), (47, 83), (32, 82), (36, 42), (50, 81), (55, 55), (56, 51), (44, 75), (7, 81), (78, 75), (85, 75), (49, 48), (26, 51), (69, 83), (41, 82), (21, 42), (59, 81), (82, 82), (70, 83), (40, 2), (33, 55), (64, 81), (60, 75), (57, 51), (91, 82), (20, 51)]