current theta: 0.665684342583 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:45:10 2014 Optimize a model with 29071 rows, 29240 columns and 87040 nonzeros Presolve removed 9292 rows and 9292 columns Presolve time: 0.54s Presolved: 19779 rows, 19948 columns, 59164 nonzeros Variable types: 0 continuous, 19948 integer (19948 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 2290 iterations, 0.13 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (4537 simplex iterations) in 0.87 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [0, 9, 11, 13, 17, 48, 71, 72, 81, 91, 94, 102, 112, 124, 129, 133, 151] edges [(112, 124), (82, 102), (144, 124), (60, 102), (36, 94), (7, 102), (21, 48), (98, 133), (11, 129), (13, 112), (18, 102), (165, 102), (143, 102), (117, 11), (152, 133), (128, 102), (76, 112), (154, 102), (42, 112), (168, 129), (108, 11), (74, 94), (23, 102), (123, 151), (133, 11), (8, 102), (103, 112), (25, 102), (126, 94), (59, 102), (6, 0), (101, 94), (96, 129), (147, 112), (30, 91), (163, 72), (114, 112), (5, 112), (10, 102), (91, 112), (14, 11), (62, 102), (87, 72), (79, 102), (71, 124), (162, 11), (113, 129), (107, 112), (33, 151), (67, 11), (132, 151), (111, 72), (81, 0), (22, 11), (140, 72), (129, 129), (2, 102), (73, 11), (97, 72), (70, 124), (161, 112), (138, 112), (65, 129), (105, 151), (122, 72), (75, 48), (104, 13), (89, 9), (56, 124), (19, 112), (139, 72), (47, 112), (12, 102), (29, 102), (116, 102), (137, 112), (48, 102), (53, 129), (157, 48), (95, 129), (40, 48), (131, 102), (39, 102), (1, 102), (35, 112), (158, 151), (153, 133), (78, 81), (34, 11), (64, 151), (164, 112), (16, 71), (4, 48), (121, 129), (106, 9), (57, 112), (119, 102), (120, 112), (77, 48), (146, 72), (54, 48), (55, 102), (28, 48), (155, 11), (100, 72), (159, 94), (145, 102), (68, 48), (118, 102), (49, 102), (32, 112), (148, 17), (52, 94), (72, 112), (93, 102), (166, 112), (38, 72), (37, 17), (84, 129), (50, 72), (92, 48), (125, 91), (167, 9), (130, 9), (51, 151), (3, 71), (66, 48), (90, 133), (43, 48), (99, 112), (115, 94), (69, 17), (151, 151), (127, 112), (136, 48), (85, 94), (58, 102), (20, 13), (149, 48), (102, 151), (86, 112), (150, 72), (156, 151), (31, 13), (63, 112), (110, 102), (41, 102), (0, 71), (15, 11), (142, 102), (109, 72), (160, 102), (46, 102), (141, 71), (135, 151), (88, 13), (44, 102), (26, 9), (134, 112), (9, 151), (61, 112), (94, 94), (169, 112), (80, 102), (24, 124), (124, 112), (17, 94), (27, 112), (45, 48), (83, 48)] current theta: 0.332842171292 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:45:11 2014 Optimize a model with 29071 rows, 29240 columns and 87040 nonzeros Presolve removed 21578 rows and 21578 columns Presolve time: 0.22s Presolved: 7493 rows, 7662 columns, 22306 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 7662 integer (7662 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1487 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3018 simplex iterations) in 0.35 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [9, 31, 36, 48, 80, 83, 86, 90, 95, 104, 107, 110, 149, 151, 156, 158, 167] edges [(147, 158), (99, 104), (135, 158), (108, 167), (41, 149), (122, 90), (96, 167), (66, 167), (55, 86), (27, 31), (46, 95), (2, 167), (142, 158), (145, 167), (131, 158), (64, 167), (26, 158), (121, 48), (159, 80), (93, 90), (86, 36), (67, 167), (38, 167), (130, 167), (169, 104), (91, 31), (161, 104), (75, 167), (154, 158), (150, 158), (59, 158), (40, 80), (132, 158), (103, 104), (156, 167), (44, 149), (167, 48), (3, 104), (30, 158), (31, 104), (127, 107), (105, 167), (78, 167), (97, 167), (35, 158), (85, 80), (116, 167), (139, 167), (62, 80), (162, 158), (128, 158), (13, 31), (102, 95), (72, 158), (51, 167), (158, 158), (24, 158), (148, 86), (19, 158), (7, 167), (94, 80), (149, 95), (111, 167), (20, 158), (47, 104), (82, 149), (71, 31), (28, 167), (18, 95), (69, 104), (68, 167), (43, 158), (53, 167), (39, 158), (89, 167), (115, 167), (6, 80), (168, 31), (83, 158), (163, 167), (33, 167), (36, 80), (1, 149), (104, 80), (56, 31), (92, 167), (70, 104), (106, 167), (79, 95), (134, 31), (0, 31), (84, 167), (165, 167), (88, 107), (5, 80), (107, 158), (144, 31), (110, 167), (8, 158), (17, 80), (120, 104), (63, 149), (119, 80), (12, 80), (77, 158), (80, 80), (87, 167), (29, 95), (34, 151), (32, 31), (126, 80), (76, 83), (114, 158), (65, 95), (23, 104), (118, 80), (4, 167), (74, 80), (15, 167), (155, 167), (138, 104), (25, 167), (60, 31), (101, 149), (143, 104), (95, 167), (146, 167), (137, 104), (153, 167), (73, 95), (157, 104), (125, 158), (100, 158), (16, 31), (50, 158), (164, 104), (123, 107), (42, 31), (124, 31), (61, 95), (52, 149), (151, 151), (166, 104), (98, 167), (57, 158), (54, 104), (136, 95), (81, 149), (10, 104), (14, 95), (113, 158), (11, 167), (117, 90), (133, 167), (109, 95), (160, 95), (112, 31), (49, 95), (37, 104), (58, 167), (129, 107), (21, 167), (48, 90), (152, 158), (9, 151), (140, 158), (45, 95), (141, 167), (22, 95), (90, 167)] current theta: 0.166421085646 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:45:11 2014 Optimize a model with 29071 rows, 29240 columns and 87040 nonzeros Presolve removed 26582 rows and 26608 columns Presolve time: 0.05s Presolved: 2489 rows, 2632 columns, 7268 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2632 integer (2632 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 2444 iterations, 0.08 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (4057 simplex iterations) in 0.17 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [46, 71, 76, 89, 93, 96, 106, 109, 115, 119, 128, 132, 154, 159, 161, 167, 169] edges [(57, 106), (79, 93), (63, 161), (146, 115), (134, 169), (145, 93), (165, 89), (60, 71), (33, 89), (71, 71), (108, 167), (92, 96), (8, 128), (44, 119), (59, 106), (88, 76), (80, 119), (118, 119), (106, 106), (121, 93), (143, 71), (75, 115), (13, 71), (54, 109), (130, 106), (27, 154), (159, 159), (115, 115), (34, 106), (129, 115), (82, 119), (87, 89), (67, 96), (89, 89), (50, 132), (53, 93), (39, 128), (104, 161), (169, 169), (149, 46), (25, 106), (16, 169), (86, 161), (131, 128), (101, 159), (65, 76), (160, 46), (154, 154), (135, 154), (111, 89), (156, 167), (99, 161), (42, 71), (23, 76), (11, 89), (124, 71), (78, 167), (97, 89), (109, 109), (163, 109), (123, 154), (24, 154), (77, 128), (32, 169), (144, 71), (100, 128), (19, 154), (37, 161), (45, 109), (51, 167), (93, 93), (10, 119), (140, 128), (120, 169), (41, 159), (62, 119), (126, 109), (46, 46), (151, 132), (29, 115), (52, 159), (7, 46), (164, 161), (141, 106), (68, 167), (1, 119), (26, 132), (153, 96), (157, 109), (83, 154), (61, 109), (31, 169), (137, 76), (5, 169), (119, 119), (64, 106), (17, 119), (22, 93), (96, 96), (110, 89), (84, 167), (36, 119), (28, 106), (58, 93), (127, 154), (2, 93), (152, 132), (40, 159), (6, 109), (47, 169), (103, 169), (132, 132), (128, 128), (12, 119), (113, 128), (69, 169), (95, 115), (3, 169), (70, 161), (155, 96), (122, 167), (138, 169), (114, 154), (161, 161), (150, 128), (166, 169), (73, 109), (102, 115), (18, 159), (20, 128), (0, 169), (91, 71), (38, 115), (116, 93), (56, 71), (48, 93), (112, 71), (4, 106), (107, 76), (81, 115), (136, 109), (125, 154), (162, 132), (167, 167), (55, 109), (147, 154), (35, 128), (30, 128), (98, 167), (15, 96), (66, 89), (76, 76), (105, 106), (21, 115), (72, 128), (90, 96), (94, 119), (9, 132), (49, 109), (158, 128), (142, 106), (133, 167), (139, 115), (117, 96), (148, 115), (74, 159), (168, 71), (43, 106), (14, 76), (85, 159)] current theta: 0.0832105428229 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:45:11 2014 Optimize a model with 29071 rows, 29240 columns and 87040 nonzeros Presolve removed 28172 rows and 28340 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 899 rows, 900 columns, 2372 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 900 integer (899 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1040 iterations, 0.01 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1040 simplex iterations) in 0.04 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.124815814234 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:45:12 2014 Optimize a model with 29071 rows, 29240 columns and 87040 nonzeros Presolve removed 27424 rows and 27524 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 1647 rows, 1716 columns, 4670 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1716 integer (1716 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1943 iterations, 0.03 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1943 simplex iterations) in 0.07 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.14561844994 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:45:12 2014 Optimize a model with 29071 rows, 29240 columns and 87040 nonzeros Presolve removed 27048 rows and 27115 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2023 rows, 2125 columns, 5829 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2125 integer (2125 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2445 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2445 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.156019767793 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:45:12 2014 Optimize a model with 29071 rows, 29240 columns and 87040 nonzeros Presolve removed 26822 rows and 26867 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2249 rows, 2373 columns, 6529 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2373 integer (2373 binary) Root relaxation: objective 1.421085e-14, 2318 iterations, 0.07 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3938 simplex iterations) in 0.16 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [1, 12, 23, 40, 43, 55, 66, 70, 96, 98, 116, 128, 132, 144, 154, 160, 166] edges [(66, 66), (17, 1), (37, 70), (84, 98), (92, 96), (167, 66), (8, 128), (145, 116), (13, 144), (2, 116), (53, 116), (85, 40), (116, 116), (5, 166), (31, 166), (91, 144), (10, 12), (122, 98), (43, 43), (25, 98), (27, 154), (62, 12), (118, 1), (6, 12), (67, 96), (57, 43), (63, 12), (83, 43), (16, 144), (23, 23), (50, 132), (163, 160), (39, 128), (98, 98), (81, 55), (104, 70), (68, 66), (28, 43), (69, 166), (44, 12), (47, 166), (131, 128), (99, 23), (154, 154), (59, 43), (73, 160), (135, 154), (65, 23), (108, 98), (107, 43), (97, 98), (126, 12), (124, 144), (11, 66), (109, 55), (100, 132), (101, 12), (45, 12), (123, 154), (24, 154), (36, 1), (77, 128), (127, 23), (152, 128), (19, 154), (3, 166), (112, 144), (95, 160), (94, 1), (82, 12), (140, 128), (14, 23), (103, 166), (7, 116), (151, 132), (70, 70), (93, 116), (121, 96), (89, 98), (26, 132), (139, 43), (169, 166), (153, 96), (164, 23), (71, 144), (56, 144), (148, 55), (161, 70), (88, 23), (96, 96), (75, 98), (12, 1), (110, 66), (80, 1), (102, 98), (74, 40), (132, 132), (61, 55), (128, 128), (141, 43), (113, 128), (38, 98), (51, 66), (120, 166), (22, 116), (155, 96), (129, 55), (78, 66), (159, 40), (136, 55), (114, 154), (133, 98), (150, 128), (160, 160), (46, 160), (4, 98), (20, 128), (33, 66), (1, 12), (54, 23), (157, 55), (58, 160), (49, 55), (119, 1), (168, 144), (40, 40), (138, 166), (142, 43), (115, 55), (125, 154), (162, 132), (106, 43), (105, 98), (41, 1), (147, 154), (111, 66), (35, 128), (48, 116), (30, 128), (165, 66), (15, 96), (34, 43), (149, 160), (60, 144), (64, 66), (52, 1), (156, 96), (72, 128), (90, 96), (87, 66), (9, 132), (144, 144), (137, 23), (143, 144), (146, 98), (79, 116), (158, 128), (86, 70), (117, 96), (29, 55), (0, 144), (42, 144), (55, 55), (134, 144), (21, 98), (130, 43), (166, 166), (76, 23), (18, 40), (32, 144)] current theta: 0.150819108867 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:45:12 2014 Optimize a model with 29071 rows, 29240 columns and 87040 nonzeros Presolve removed 26936 rows and 26990 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2135 rows, 2250 columns, 6178 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2250 integer (2250 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 2119 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3626 simplex iterations) in 0.14 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [6, 11, 18, 19, 43, 53, 54, 81, 98, 100, 114, 119, 144, 152, 153, 160, 166] edges [(128, 152), (131, 100), (149, 18), (84, 98), (111, 11), (44, 119), (13, 144), (140, 152), (76, 81), (50, 11), (80, 119), (118, 119), (5, 166), (77, 152), (15, 53), (87, 11), (31, 166), (91, 144), (67, 153), (122, 98), (148, 81), (43, 43), (25, 98), (7, 160), (54, 54), (65, 81), (82, 119), (57, 43), (16, 144), (101, 119), (163, 160), (98, 98), (104, 54), (29, 81), (28, 43), (69, 166), (47, 166), (79, 53), (159, 18), (136, 6), (150, 100), (59, 43), (53, 53), (108, 98), (107, 43), (97, 98), (123, 114), (124, 144), (6, 54), (14, 81), (96, 153), (154, 114), (51, 98), (58, 53), (55, 81), (127, 114), (40, 18), (3, 166), (88, 114), (112, 144), (95, 160), (10, 119), (11, 11), (113, 152), (85, 18), (145, 53), (103, 166), (78, 11), (62, 119), (70, 54), (92, 153), (89, 98), (61, 81), (151, 100), (1, 119), (139, 43), (125, 19), (137, 54), (169, 166), (155, 153), (22, 53), (41, 119), (20, 19), (64, 11), (71, 144), (164, 54), (56, 144), (119, 119), (126, 18), (27, 114), (17, 119), (161, 54), (75, 98), (156, 153), (36, 119), (74, 18), (81, 81), (102, 98), (93, 53), (141, 43), (38, 98), (120, 166), (37, 6), (52, 119), (63, 6), (153, 153), (73, 6), (152, 152), (133, 98), (160, 160), (46, 160), (4, 98), (48, 53), (165, 153), (18, 18), (32, 166), (66, 98), (114, 114), (23, 54), (168, 144), (147, 114), (35, 152), (138, 166), (142, 43), (12, 6), (30, 152), (106, 43), (105, 98), (86, 54), (99, 54), (116, 53), (167, 153), (72, 152), (34, 152), (90, 53), (49, 6), (158, 152), (19, 19), (60, 144), (100, 100), (94, 119), (45, 6), (26, 100), (162, 152), (132, 100), (144, 144), (143, 144), (146, 98), (9, 100), (2, 53), (121, 53), (117, 153), (115, 81), (83, 114), (0, 144), (33, 11), (42, 144), (110, 153), (135, 43), (129, 81), (157, 54), (68, 11), (39, 152), (134, 144), (21, 98), (130, 43), (109, 6), (166, 166), (8, 152), (24, 43)] current theta: 0.148218779403 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:45:12 2014 Optimize a model with 29071 rows, 29240 columns and 87040 nonzeros Presolve removed 27002 rows and 27063 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2069 rows, 2177 columns, 5973 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2177 integer (2177 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2243 iterations, 0.07 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2243 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.149518944135 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:45:13 2014 Optimize a model with 29071 rows, 29240 columns and 87040 nonzeros Presolve removed 26968 rows and 27024 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2103 rows, 2216 columns, 6080 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2216 integer (2216 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2148 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2148 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.150169026501 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:45:13 2014 Optimize a model with 29071 rows, 29240 columns and 87040 nonzeros Presolve removed 26946 rows and 27001 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2125 rows, 2239 columns, 6147 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2239 integer (2239 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2059 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2059 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.150494067684 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:45:13 2014 Optimize a model with 29071 rows, 29240 columns and 87040 nonzeros Presolve removed 26938 rows and 26992 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2133 rows, 2248 columns, 6172 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2248 integer (2248 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2307 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2307 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.150656588275 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:45:13 2014 Optimize a model with 29071 rows, 29240 columns and 87040 nonzeros Presolve removed 26936 rows and 26990 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2135 rows, 2250 columns, 6178 nonzeros Loaded MIP start with objective 0 Variable types: 0 continuous, 2250 integer (2250 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 134 iterations, 0.00 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 0.00000 -1.00000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (134 simplex iterations) in 0.05 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [6, 11, 18, 19, 43, 53, 54, 81, 98, 100, 114, 119, 144, 152, 153, 160, 166] edges [(128, 152), (131, 100), (149, 18), (84, 98), (111, 11), (44, 119), (13, 144), (140, 152), (76, 81), (50, 11), (80, 119), (118, 119), (5, 166), (77, 152), (15, 53), (87, 11), (31, 166), (91, 144), (67, 153), (122, 98), (148, 81), (43, 43), (25, 98), (7, 160), (54, 54), (65, 81), (82, 119), (57, 43), (16, 144), (101, 119), (163, 160), (98, 98), (104, 54), (29, 81), (28, 43), (69, 166), (47, 166), (79, 53), (159, 18), (136, 6), (150, 100), (59, 43), (53, 53), (108, 98), (107, 43), (97, 98), (123, 114), (124, 144), (6, 54), (14, 81), (96, 153), (154, 114), (51, 98), (58, 53), (55, 81), (127, 114), (40, 18), (3, 166), (88, 114), (112, 144), (95, 160), (10, 119), (11, 11), (113, 152), (85, 18), (145, 53), (103, 166), (78, 11), (62, 119), (70, 54), (92, 153), (89, 98), (61, 81), (151, 100), (1, 119), (139, 43), (125, 19), (137, 54), (169, 166), (155, 153), (22, 53), (41, 119), (20, 19), (64, 11), (71, 144), (164, 54), (56, 144), (119, 119), (126, 18), (27, 114), (17, 119), (161, 54), (75, 98), (156, 153), (36, 119), (74, 18), (81, 81), (102, 98), (93, 53), (141, 43), (38, 98), (120, 166), (37, 6), (52, 119), (63, 6), (153, 153), (73, 6), (152, 152), (133, 98), (160, 160), (46, 160), (4, 98), (48, 53), (165, 153), (18, 18), (32, 166), (66, 98), (114, 114), (23, 54), (168, 144), (147, 114), (35, 152), (138, 166), (142, 43), (12, 6), (30, 152), (106, 43), (105, 98), (86, 54), (99, 54), (116, 53), (167, 153), (72, 152), (34, 152), (90, 53), (49, 6), (158, 152), (19, 19), (60, 144), (100, 100), (94, 119), (45, 6), (26, 100), (162, 152), (132, 100), (144, 144), (143, 144), (146, 98), (9, 100), (2, 53), (121, 53), (117, 153), (115, 81), (83, 114), (0, 144), (33, 11), (42, 144), (110, 153), (135, 43), (129, 81), (157, 54), (68, 11), (39, 152), (134, 144), (21, 98), (130, 43), (109, 6), (166, 166), (8, 152), (24, 43)] current theta: 0.150575327979 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:45:13 2014 Optimize a model with 29071 rows, 29240 columns and 87040 nonzeros Presolve removed 26936 rows and 26990 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2135 rows, 2250 columns, 6178 nonzeros Loaded MIP start with objective 0 Variable types: 0 continuous, 2250 integer (2250 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 134 iterations, 0.00 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 0.00000 -1.00000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (134 simplex iterations) in 0.05 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [6, 11, 18, 19, 43, 53, 54, 81, 98, 100, 114, 119, 144, 152, 153, 160, 166] edges [(128, 152), (131, 100), (149, 18), (84, 98), (111, 11), (44, 119), (13, 144), (140, 152), (76, 81), (50, 11), (80, 119), (118, 119), (5, 166), (77, 152), (15, 53), (87, 11), (31, 166), (91, 144), (67, 153), (122, 98), (148, 81), (43, 43), (25, 98), (7, 160), (54, 54), (65, 81), (82, 119), (57, 43), (16, 144), (101, 119), (163, 160), (98, 98), (104, 54), (29, 81), (28, 43), (69, 166), (47, 166), (79, 53), (159, 18), (136, 6), (150, 100), (59, 43), (53, 53), (108, 98), (107, 43), (97, 98), (123, 114), (124, 144), (6, 54), (14, 81), (96, 153), (154, 114), (51, 98), (58, 53), (55, 81), (127, 114), (40, 18), (3, 166), (88, 114), (112, 144), (95, 160), (10, 119), (11, 11), (113, 152), (85, 18), (145, 53), (103, 166), (78, 11), (62, 119), (70, 54), (92, 153), (89, 98), (61, 81), (151, 100), (1, 119), (139, 43), (125, 19), (137, 54), (169, 166), (155, 153), (22, 53), (41, 119), (20, 19), (64, 11), (71, 144), (164, 54), (56, 144), (119, 119), (126, 18), (27, 114), (17, 119), (161, 54), (75, 98), (156, 153), (36, 119), (74, 18), (81, 81), (102, 98), (93, 53), (141, 43), (38, 98), (120, 166), (37, 6), (52, 119), (63, 6), (153, 153), (73, 6), (152, 152), (133, 98), (160, 160), (46, 160), (4, 98), (48, 53), (165, 153), (18, 18), (32, 166), (66, 98), (114, 114), (23, 54), (168, 144), (147, 114), (35, 152), (138, 166), (142, 43), (12, 6), (30, 152), (106, 43), (105, 98), (86, 54), (99, 54), (116, 53), (167, 153), (72, 152), (34, 152), (90, 53), (49, 6), (158, 152), (19, 19), (60, 144), (100, 100), (94, 119), (45, 6), (26, 100), (162, 152), (132, 100), (144, 144), (143, 144), (146, 98), (9, 100), (2, 53), (121, 53), (117, 153), (115, 81), (83, 114), (0, 144), (33, 11), (42, 144), (110, 153), (135, 43), (129, 81), (157, 54), (68, 11), (39, 152), (134, 144), (21, 98), (130, 43), (109, 6), (166, 166), (8, 152), (24, 43)]