current theta: 0.676774269736 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:24:52 2014 Optimize a model with 26407 rows, 26568 columns and 79056 nonzeros Presolve removed 7590 rows and 7590 columns Presolve time: 0.43s Presolved: 18817 rows, 18978 columns, 56286 nonzeros Variable types: 0 continuous, 18978 integer (18978 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1229 iterations, 0.02 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2433 simplex iterations) in 0.51 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [0, 17, 22, 36, 66, 73, 92, 101, 103, 109, 130, 132, 134, 141, 143, 157, 160] edges [(61, 103), (56, 103), (144, 160), (112, 103), (79, 103), (105, 157), (16, 160), (97, 160), (120, 160), (83, 101), (62, 101), (30, 103), (156, 101), (51, 103), (114, 103), (6, 103), (139, 103), (110, 103), (117, 103), (17, 160), (50, 160), (27, 103), (142, 103), (7, 160), (36, 101), (153, 160), (72, 101), (95, 101), (121, 101), (134, 157), (89, 160), (44, 103), (12, 101), (49, 157), (88, 157), (116, 101), (126, 157), (73, 160), (70, 157), (96, 160), (154, 160), (106, 157), (21, 109), (87, 109), (151, 157), (92, 101), (39, 103), (146, 157), (102, 157), (138, 160), (43, 101), (82, 103), (60, 103), (64, 160), (53, 160), (11, 103), (122, 103), (128, 103), (111, 109), (147, 157), (123, 101), (32, 103), (38, 160), (143, 109), (67, 160), (40, 101), (152, 157), (65, 160), (59, 101), (45, 101), (13, 103), (145, 103), (78, 157), (55, 160), (1, 157), (8, 103), (25, 101), (81, 101), (118, 160), (98, 92), (115, 157), (131, 157), (52, 103), (108, 103), (100, 157), (3, 103), (10, 103), (0, 160), (129, 157), (80, 157), (76, 160), (35, 157), (94, 101), (161, 103), (24, 103), (69, 103), (47, 103), (119, 160), (103, 103), (93, 160), (135, 103), (71, 92), (90, 103), (37, 101), (5, 103), (124, 103), (41, 103), (26, 103), (77, 160), (15, 157), (31, 160), (9, 101), (85, 103), (74, 160), (160, 160), (46, 160), (22, 109), (127, 101), (2, 103), (86, 160), (68, 160), (136, 101), (91, 160), (132, 157), (63, 101), (57, 103), (58, 160), (159, 160), (104, 109), (75, 160), (133, 160), (23, 157), (101, 157), (48, 103), (29, 160), (33, 103), (148, 103), (141, 157), (54, 157), (14, 157), (158, 103), (28, 103), (109, 103), (113, 160), (4, 103), (19, 160), (137, 103), (107, 160), (18, 160), (155, 103), (66, 103), (150, 160), (84, 157), (99, 157), (130, 101), (125, 103), (34, 101), (149, 101), (20, 160), (140, 101), (42, 103), (157, 130)] current theta: 0.338387134868 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:24:52 2014 Optimize a model with 26407 rows, 26568 columns and 79056 nonzeros Presolve removed 19426 rows and 19426 columns Presolve time: 0.19s Presolved: 6981 rows, 7142 columns, 20778 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 7142 integer (7142 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1296 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2761 simplex iterations) in 0.32 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [17, 30, 49, 72, 73, 74, 82, 86, 91, 104, 111, 113, 124, 143, 144, 155, 160] edges [(80, 155), (35, 155), (132, 155), (50, 73), (114, 72), (100, 155), (51, 124), (19, 155), (58, 17), (26, 124), (159, 73), (78, 155), (61, 49), (17, 160), (37, 111), (161, 30), (153, 91), (3, 124), (133, 155), (15, 155), (16, 144), (64, 91), (107, 86), (110, 111), (29, 144), (121, 72), (117, 111), (7, 86), (148, 124), (70, 82), (30, 91), (142, 143), (73, 160), (46, 30), (14, 155), (101, 155), (22, 143), (136, 111), (87, 72), (152, 155), (63, 111), (141, 155), (23, 155), (75, 144), (77, 111), (41, 124), (62, 144), (83, 30), (27, 30), (98, 111), (2, 30), (131, 155), (145, 111), (104, 91), (111, 72), (60, 143), (99, 155), (66, 72), (149, 124), (74, 91), (56, 124), (147, 82), (40, 72), (139, 72), (92, 30), (103, 111), (105, 155), (54, 155), (81, 124), (84, 155), (135, 111), (125, 155), (156, 111), (67, 111), (109, 144), (130, 155), (6, 155), (93, 160), (155, 82), (43, 30), (8, 124), (151, 155), (137, 124), (33, 124), (116, 73), (38, 155), (12, 72), (85, 124), (42, 72), (134, 155), (52, 86), (9, 72), (160, 160), (5, 111), (97, 113), (88, 86), (126, 155), (21, 124), (48, 111), (138, 155), (71, 111), (154, 144), (91, 160), (10, 124), (39, 72), (53, 91), (69, 72), (157, 82), (150, 91), (113, 30), (102, 155), (44, 155), (36, 111), (47, 143), (0, 86), (79, 155), (128, 72), (72, 111), (95, 111), (106, 155), (57, 111), (34, 124), (76, 155), (143, 143), (94, 144), (146, 155), (28, 155), (140, 86), (123, 111), (86, 155), (68, 144), (122, 124), (65, 144), (82, 155), (31, 86), (90, 49), (127, 124), (119, 74), (59, 111), (55, 144), (11, 124), (13, 72), (124, 124), (1, 155), (89, 86), (118, 74), (120, 86), (49, 155), (158, 111), (18, 160), (25, 124), (45, 72), (144, 86), (96, 86), (115, 155), (112, 111), (108, 72), (129, 155), (4, 111), (32, 86), (24, 124), (20, 160)] current theta: 0.169193567434 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:24:53 2014 Optimize a model with 26407 rows, 26568 columns and 79056 nonzeros Presolve removed 24154 rows and 24183 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2253 rows, 2385 columns, 6565 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2385 integer (2385 binary) Root relaxation: objective 2.486900e-14, 2201 iterations, 0.07 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (4797 simplex iterations) in 0.16 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [5, 10, 17, 23, 55, 57, 62, 73, 74, 76, 94, 110, 121, 129, 142, 151, 158] edges [(47, 142), (130, 129), (22, 142), (113, 62), (24, 10), (0, 76), (141, 129), (147, 151), (27, 62), (15, 151), (155, 151), (152, 151), (25, 10), (56, 10), (98, 110), (51, 10), (79, 158), (149, 5), (60, 142), (29, 62), (38, 94), (19, 76), (131, 151), (136, 57), (103, 5), (101, 151), (92, 62), (21, 10), (54, 129), (46, 76), (96, 76), (33, 10), (28, 129), (107, 55), (97, 110), (16, 62), (89, 158), (90, 158), (112, 121), (93, 73), (40, 5), (140, 5), (43, 62), (34, 10), (20, 73), (138, 76), (137, 10), (150, 74), (30, 55), (23, 151), (55, 76), (122, 10), (73, 73), (143, 142), (158, 158), (106, 129), (134, 129), (68, 158), (26, 121), (84, 151), (2, 55), (63, 158), (99, 151), (129, 129), (85, 121), (124, 10), (64, 55), (105, 151), (161, 62), (39, 158), (104, 55), (117, 57), (121, 5), (32, 158), (144, 76), (133, 76), (72, 57), (8, 10), (50, 110), (12, 5), (148, 121), (3, 10), (120, 158), (119, 110), (9, 121), (49, 151), (153, 73), (31, 76), (157, 129), (159, 110), (36, 57), (116, 110), (48, 142), (77, 158), (14, 129), (70, 151), (4, 158), (13, 142), (69, 57), (114, 158), (83, 62), (18, 55), (118, 110), (11, 10), (126, 151), (10, 10), (44, 76), (58, 74), (61, 5), (88, 151), (45, 57), (108, 5), (6, 151), (75, 76), (145, 121), (80, 129), (91, 17), (128, 5), (139, 5), (7, 76), (135, 110), (86, 23), (62, 62), (81, 10), (71, 142), (67, 110), (5, 5), (66, 142), (151, 151), (53, 74), (52, 5), (57, 57), (41, 5), (127, 10), (146, 151), (102, 151), (76, 76), (17, 17), (37, 5), (156, 158), (74, 62), (59, 57), (160, 17), (82, 151), (132, 129), (95, 5), (115, 151), (109, 158), (42, 142), (110, 110), (100, 151), (154, 55), (87, 142), (125, 129), (65, 55), (111, 57), (94, 94), (35, 151), (142, 142), (123, 57), (1, 151), (78, 129)] current theta: 0.084596783717 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:24:53 2014 Optimize a model with 26407 rows, 26568 columns and 79056 nonzeros Presolve removed 25548 rows and 25708 columns Presolve time: 0.02s Presolved: 859 rows, 860 columns, 2262 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 860 integer (859 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 940 iterations, 0.01 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (940 simplex iterations) in 0.03 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.126895175576 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:24:53 2014 Optimize a model with 26407 rows, 26568 columns and 79056 nonzeros Presolve removed 24938 rows and 25048 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1469 rows, 1520 columns, 4132 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1520 integer (1520 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1788 iterations, 0.03 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1788 simplex iterations) in 0.05 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.148044371505 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:24:53 2014 Optimize a model with 26407 rows, 26568 columns and 79056 nonzeros Presolve removed 24548 rows and 24610 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1859 rows, 1958 columns, 5350 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1958 integer (1958 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2375 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2375 simplex iterations) in 0.09 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.158618969469 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:24:53 2014 Optimize a model with 26407 rows, 26568 columns and 79056 nonzeros Presolve removed 24350 rows and 24398 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2057 rows, 2170 columns, 5958 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2170 integer (2170 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1901 iterations, 0.05 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3074 simplex iterations) in 0.13 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [29, 43, 55, 84, 87, 89, 91, 93, 97, 121, 130, 135, 136, 137, 138, 140, 151] edges [(161, 43), (11, 137), (83, 97), (46, 29), (12, 121), (45, 136), (147, 151), (42, 135), (79, 89), (119, 135), (54, 138), (22, 87), (15, 151), (155, 151), (7, 55), (156, 136), (39, 136), (2, 29), (69, 136), (43, 43), (131, 151), (117, 135), (129, 130), (62, 43), (132, 130), (51, 137), (60, 87), (19, 55), (153, 97), (53, 93), (78, 130), (107, 55), (130, 130), (73, 93), (0, 138), (112, 121), (16, 29), (110, 135), (116, 97), (143, 87), (10, 137), (76, 55), (40, 121), (36, 136), (92, 97), (124, 137), (21, 84), (48, 87), (144, 55), (30, 55), (23, 151), (37, 140), (93, 93), (66, 87), (121, 121), (149, 137), (63, 89), (95, 140), (50, 97), (26, 121), (84, 151), (8, 137), (99, 151), (47, 87), (13, 135), (20, 93), (28, 138), (96, 138), (85, 121), (64, 55), (105, 140), (118, 97), (104, 55), (122, 84), (52, 140), (114, 43), (109, 89), (108, 140), (25, 137), (148, 121), (94, 138), (38, 138), (97, 97), (140, 89), (31, 138), (158, 89), (9, 121), (49, 151), (103, 136), (58, 93), (59, 136), (98, 135), (138, 138), (70, 151), (142, 87), (133, 138), (27, 97), (106, 130), (136, 136), (89, 140), (134, 130), (139, 140), (32, 89), (33, 137), (4, 89), (44, 138), (126, 84), (18, 55), (90, 89), (123, 136), (120, 89), (88, 151), (101, 84), (56, 137), (6, 151), (17, 91), (145, 121), (125, 130), (87, 87), (159, 97), (150, 91), (91, 91), (137, 137), (86, 89), (141, 130), (135, 135), (151, 151), (146, 151), (102, 151), (14, 138), (57, 136), (113, 43), (82, 151), (128, 121), (80, 138), (3, 137), (68, 89), (67, 135), (81, 137), (75, 138), (71, 136), (160, 91), (115, 151), (127, 137), (41, 140), (34, 137), (77, 43), (24, 137), (100, 151), (74, 93), (29, 55), (72, 136), (111, 136), (55, 55), (154, 55), (65, 55), (152, 84), (35, 151), (1, 151), (5, 140), (61, 140), (157, 130)] current theta: 0.153331670487 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:24:54 2014 Optimize a model with 26407 rows, 26568 columns and 79056 nonzeros Presolve removed 24452 rows and 24505 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1955 rows, 2063 columns, 5647 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2063 integer (2063 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2216 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2216 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.155975319978 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:24:54 2014 Optimize a model with 26407 rows, 26568 columns and 79056 nonzeros Presolve removed 24390 rows and 24440 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2017 rows, 2128 columns, 5836 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2128 integer (2128 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 2074 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3212 simplex iterations) in 0.12 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [40, 55, 57, 58, 62, 67, 77, 79, 84, 87, 91, 129, 137, 138, 140, 151, 153] edges [(107, 79), (117, 77), (11, 137), (130, 129), (147, 151), (119, 77), (42, 57), (27, 62), (128, 40), (121, 40), (116, 67), (54, 138), (22, 87), (120, 79), (15, 151), (118, 153), (109, 79), (155, 151), (7, 55), (2, 58), (53, 58), (30, 58), (86, 79), (131, 151), (136, 57), (98, 67), (51, 137), (13, 67), (20, 153), (60, 87), (92, 62), (158, 79), (16, 62), (0, 138), (4, 79), (114, 77), (143, 87), (10, 137), (76, 55), (93, 58), (35, 84), (124, 137), (21, 84), (48, 87), (144, 55), (23, 151), (37, 140), (9, 40), (66, 87), (106, 129), (149, 137), (134, 129), (95, 140), (79, 79), (84, 151), (19, 79), (8, 137), (99, 151), (47, 87), (39, 77), (129, 129), (28, 138), (26, 40), (85, 137), (96, 138), (64, 55), (105, 140), (161, 62), (90, 77), (104, 55), (122, 84), (52, 140), (63, 77), (108, 140), (12, 40), (25, 137), (72, 57), (32, 77), (94, 138), (38, 138), (68, 79), (31, 138), (43, 77), (49, 151), (77, 77), (157, 129), (112, 40), (113, 77), (97, 153), (138, 138), (70, 151), (142, 87), (133, 138), (89, 140), (69, 57), (139, 140), (33, 137), (156, 57), (83, 62), (44, 138), (18, 55), (73, 153), (153, 153), (71, 57), (126, 151), (50, 153), (88, 151), (45, 57), (58, 58), (101, 84), (56, 137), (148, 40), (103, 40), (159, 153), (6, 151), (145, 40), (17, 91), (141, 138), (67, 67), (87, 87), (140, 140), (150, 91), (91, 91), (137, 137), (40, 40), (62, 62), (110, 67), (151, 151), (57, 57), (146, 151), (102, 151), (14, 138), (82, 151), (80, 138), (3, 137), (132, 129), (81, 137), (135, 67), (75, 138), (160, 91), (74, 58), (115, 151), (127, 137), (41, 140), (34, 137), (24, 137), (100, 151), (29, 55), (36, 77), (46, 79), (55, 55), (154, 55), (125, 129), (65, 55), (152, 84), (111, 57), (123, 57), (59, 40), (1, 151), (78, 129), (5, 140), (61, 140)] current theta: 0.154653495233 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:24:54 2014 Optimize a model with 26407 rows, 26568 columns and 79056 nonzeros Presolve removed 24412 rows and 24464 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 1995 rows, 2104 columns, 5768 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2104 integer (2104 binary) Root relaxation: objective -7.105427e-15, 1906 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 -0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3062 simplex iterations) in 0.13 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [36, 40, 43, 55, 58, 67, 79, 84, 87, 91, 123, 130, 137, 138, 140, 151, 153] edges [(107, 79), (161, 43), (11, 137), (32, 36), (147, 151), (128, 40), (121, 40), (116, 67), (54, 138), (22, 87), (120, 79), (118, 153), (109, 79), (155, 151), (7, 55), (2, 58), (136, 123), (53, 58), (30, 58), (86, 79), (43, 43), (129, 130), (62, 43), (132, 130), (131, 84), (98, 67), (51, 137), (13, 67), (20, 153), (60, 87), (83, 43), (158, 79), (78, 130), (130, 130), (15, 84), (0, 138), (4, 79), (156, 36), (143, 87), (10, 137), (76, 55), (93, 58), (35, 84), (124, 137), (21, 84), (36, 36), (48, 87), (144, 55), (92, 43), (23, 151), (84, 84), (37, 140), (9, 40), (66, 87), (149, 137), (27, 153), (95, 140), (79, 79), (63, 36), (19, 79), (8, 137), (99, 151), (47, 87), (28, 138), (26, 40), (85, 137), (96, 138), (64, 55), (105, 140), (104, 55), (122, 84), (117, 36), (52, 140), (108, 140), (12, 40), (25, 137), (94, 138), (69, 123), (38, 138), (68, 79), (31, 138), (49, 151), (97, 153), (138, 138), (70, 151), (142, 87), (71, 123), (133, 138), (16, 43), (106, 130), (72, 123), (39, 36), (89, 140), (134, 130), (139, 140), (33, 137), (44, 138), (18, 55), (73, 153), (153, 153), (126, 151), (50, 153), (88, 151), (58, 58), (101, 84), (56, 137), (148, 40), (103, 40), (159, 153), (6, 151), (145, 40), (17, 91), (125, 130), (141, 138), (67, 67), (45, 123), (87, 87), (140, 140), (150, 91), (91, 91), (137, 137), (40, 40), (112, 123), (114, 36), (110, 67), (151, 151), (42, 36), (146, 151), (102, 151), (14, 138), (113, 43), (82, 151), (80, 138), (119, 43), (3, 137), (57, 123), (81, 137), (135, 67), (75, 138), (160, 91), (74, 58), (115, 151), (127, 137), (41, 140), (34, 137), (77, 43), (24, 137), (123, 123), (100, 151), (90, 79), (29, 55), (46, 79), (55, 55), (154, 55), (65, 55), (59, 123), (152, 84), (111, 36), (1, 151), (5, 140), (61, 140), (157, 130)] current theta: 0.15399258286 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:24:54 2014 Optimize a model with 26407 rows, 26568 columns and 79056 nonzeros Presolve removed 24434 rows and 24486 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1973 rows, 2082 columns, 5702 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2082 integer (2082 binary) Root relaxation: objective 7.105427e-15, 2008 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3077 simplex iterations) in 0.12 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [40, 55, 57, 58, 62, 67, 79, 84, 87, 91, 114, 130, 137, 138, 139, 151, 153] edges [(107, 79), (11, 137), (109, 114), (113, 62), (41, 139), (147, 151), (42, 57), (128, 40), (121, 40), (116, 67), (54, 138), (22, 87), (120, 79), (15, 151), (118, 153), (155, 151), (7, 55), (2, 58), (53, 58), (30, 58), (86, 79), (12, 139), (129, 130), (132, 130), (136, 57), (131, 84), (98, 67), (51, 137), (13, 67), (20, 153), (60, 87), (92, 62), (158, 79), (78, 130), (16, 62), (32, 114), (130, 130), (0, 138), (5, 139), (4, 79), (111, 114), (143, 87), (10, 137), (76, 55), (93, 58), (52, 139), (108, 139), (36, 114), (124, 137), (21, 84), (48, 87), (144, 55), (23, 151), (84, 84), (9, 40), (66, 87), (27, 153), (63, 114), (79, 79), (19, 79), (8, 137), (99, 151), (47, 87), (28, 138), (26, 40), (85, 137), (96, 138), (64, 55), (39, 114), (161, 62), (104, 55), (122, 84), (105, 84), (25, 137), (72, 57), (94, 138), (38, 138), (68, 79), (31, 138), (37, 40), (77, 114), (49, 151), (61, 139), (89, 79), (112, 40), (117, 114), (97, 153), (138, 138), (70, 151), (142, 87), (133, 138), (106, 130), (69, 57), (140, 139), (134, 130), (33, 137), (156, 57), (83, 62), (44, 138), (126, 84), (18, 55), (73, 153), (153, 153), (71, 57), (50, 153), (88, 151), (45, 57), (58, 58), (101, 84), (56, 137), (148, 40), (159, 153), (6, 151), (145, 40), (95, 139), (17, 91), (125, 130), (141, 138), (67, 67), (87, 87), (114, 114), (150, 91), (91, 91), (137, 137), (40, 40), (62, 62), (119, 114), (110, 67), (103, 139), (151, 151), (57, 57), (146, 151), (102, 151), (149, 139), (14, 138), (59, 57), (82, 151), (80, 138), (3, 137), (81, 137), (135, 67), (75, 138), (160, 91), (43, 114), (74, 58), (115, 151), (127, 137), (34, 137), (24, 137), (100, 151), (90, 79), (29, 55), (139, 139), (46, 79), (55, 55), (154, 55), (65, 55), (152, 84), (35, 151), (123, 57), (1, 151), (157, 130)] current theta: 0.153662126673 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:24:54 2014 Optimize a model with 26407 rows, 26568 columns and 79056 nonzeros Presolve removed 24442 rows and 24494 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1965 rows, 2074 columns, 5678 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2074 integer (2074 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2231 iterations, 0.07 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2231 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.153827354767 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:24:55 2014 Optimize a model with 26407 rows, 26568 columns and 79056 nonzeros Presolve removed 24440 rows and 24492 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1967 rows, 2076 columns, 5684 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2076 integer (2076 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2271 iterations, 0.07 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2271 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.153909968813 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:24:55 2014 Optimize a model with 26407 rows, 26568 columns and 79056 nonzeros Presolve removed 24438 rows and 24490 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1969 rows, 2078 columns, 5690 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2078 integer (2078 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2045 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2045 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap -