current theta: 0.686033431048 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:39:11 2014 Optimize a model with 28057 rows, 28223 columns and 84001 nonzeros Presolve removed 7904 rows and 7904 columns Presolve time: 0.46s Presolved: 20153 rows, 20319 columns, 60289 nonzeros Variable types: 0 continuous, 20319 integer (20319 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1809 iterations, 0.06 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3835 simplex iterations) in 0.62 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [0, 13, 17, 20, 27, 41, 50, 53, 60, 73, 94, 116, 119, 143, 151, 152, 159] edges [(81, 152), (99, 53), (69, 94), (33, 152), (65, 159), (51, 41), (39, 94), (165, 41), (145, 27), (101, 152), (103, 17), (63, 151), (129, 151), (15, 151), (77, 17), (16, 94), (80, 119), (59, 27), (135, 27), (30, 17), (124, 94), (93, 20), (11, 152), (82, 94), (44, 53), (22, 17), (7, 94), (43, 20), (115, 41), (133, 159), (73, 159), (97, 73), (159, 159), (2, 50), (13, 159), (70, 94), (131, 41), (79, 53), (120, 41), (45, 94), (53, 53), (152, 41), (55, 41), (75, 41), (52, 143), (87, 27), (153, 60), (117, 119), (17, 27), (89, 53), (142, 41), (95, 152), (92, 50), (125, 152), (31, 119), (106, 41), (67, 119), (110, 143), (61, 143), (50, 159), (58, 53), (91, 159), (127, 41), (113, 53), (34, 41), (160, 143), (107, 116), (140, 143), (136, 27), (41, 53), (98, 17), (163, 50), (12, 13), (36, 53), (3, 41), (162, 27), (18, 17), (71, 73), (150, 159), (14, 41), (46, 0), (60, 159), (166, 119), (27, 60), (20, 27), (130, 94), (96, 53), (0, 41), (19, 41), (49, 152), (56, 152), (128, 53), (147, 94), (24, 53), (121, 116), (126, 53), (86, 73), (157, 94), (132, 94), (5, 41), (114, 17), (62, 116), (158, 20), (161, 73), (138, 94), (26, 41), (40, 27), (25, 94), (134, 94), (164, 152), (105, 41), (111, 116), (116, 27), (118, 27), (4, 119), (137, 119), (66, 27), (37, 17), (83, 53), (149, 152), (38, 27), (148, 60), (29, 17), (104, 27), (122, 0), (54, 94), (154, 17), (143, 143), (90, 53), (8, 94), (68, 27), (85, 94), (35, 119), (144, 41), (155, 41), (10, 152), (139, 94), (21, 94), (112, 119), (78, 94), (48, 50), (47, 159), (1, 94), (42, 73), (32, 94), (76, 143), (108, 60), (72, 20), (151, 27), (88, 152), (6, 94), (9, 53), (84, 94), (100, 151), (146, 94), (28, 94), (64, 20), (141, 94), (123, 143), (74, 159), (23, 53), (119, 94), (94, 53), (156, 152), (57, 73), (102, 152), (109, 60)] current theta: 0.343016715524 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:39:11 2014 Optimize a model with 28057 rows, 28223 columns and 84001 nonzeros Presolve removed 20510 rows and 20510 columns Presolve time: 0.21s Presolved: 7547 rows, 7713 columns, 22471 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 7713 integer (7713 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 1232 iterations, 0.04 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3043 simplex iterations) in 0.33 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [8, 20, 33, 39, 60, 76, 90, 103, 104, 106, 109, 112, 120, 135, 140, 143, 159] edges [(15, 33), (61, 103), (145, 39), (85, 106), (82, 106), (156, 109), (112, 103), (26, 39), (38, 104), (144, 103), (66, 20), (21, 106), (37, 103), (113, 104), (119, 20), (125, 33), (114, 103), (106, 106), (165, 60), (93, 20), (99, 33), (83, 109), (79, 76), (162, 76), (57, 39), (74, 104), (89, 120), (73, 159), (17, 20), (10, 8), (59, 60), (141, 33), (152, 33), (104, 103), (13, 159), (1, 33), (137, 106), (92, 109), (8, 106), (122, 106), (29, 103), (63, 103), (44, 120), (110, 135), (100, 8), (70, 33), (127, 33), (147, 8), (64, 76), (101, 33), (81, 8), (16, 112), (45, 39), (67, 143), (50, 159), (96, 103), (148, 39), (115, 106), (91, 159), (30, 104), (49, 33), (71, 159), (32, 103), (39, 60), (51, 106), (55, 103), (86, 33), (128, 33), (164, 33), (95, 120), (22, 159), (69, 104), (14, 33), (142, 104), (153, 135), (118, 143), (159, 60), (4, 76), (52, 103), (53, 159), (97, 109), (98, 143), (149, 120), (150, 159), (140, 103), (20, 143), (132, 106), (41, 33), (88, 33), (60, 159), (124, 33), (130, 8), (62, 103), (161, 103), (103, 103), (56, 8), (87, 104), (131, 106), (18, 104), (90, 103), (2, 60), (68, 39), (5, 103), (0, 103), (157, 8), (19, 103), (121, 120), (78, 8), (160, 20), (166, 103), (48, 159), (36, 103), (65, 109), (54, 103), (72, 103), (120, 39), (117, 109), (84, 8), (6, 106), (46, 109), (47, 143), (23, 120), (12, 120), (133, 39), (27, 104), (163, 33), (107, 103), (94, 106), (9, 120), (75, 120), (143, 143), (3, 106), (58, 90), (7, 103), (111, 103), (34, 8), (116, 20), (33, 33), (43, 103), (158, 103), (77, 109), (146, 106), (11, 120), (28, 103), (76, 76), (105, 106), (109, 103), (80, 106), (25, 120), (123, 103), (134, 8), (154, 120), (108, 39), (151, 106), (40, 103), (102, 33), (136, 60), (138, 8), (155, 33), (24, 120), (126, 120), (129, 33), (135, 109), (42, 90), (35, 103), (139, 33), (31, 109)] current theta: 0.171508357762 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:39:12 2014 Optimize a model with 28057 rows, 28223 columns and 84001 nonzeros Presolve removed 25560 rows and 25583 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2497 rows, 2640 columns, 7298 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2640 integer (2640 binary) Root relaxation: objective 2.486900e-14, 2399 iterations, 0.07 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3705 simplex iterations) in 0.15 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [13, 44, 64, 71, 73, 76, 82, 89, 97, 112, 116, 120, 124, 157, 158, 161, 164] edges [(13, 13), (60, 13), (83, 97), (50, 73), (34, 157), (0, 76), (93, 97), (28, 82), (71, 71), (130, 157), (108, 44), (52, 76), (67, 116), (47, 97), (112, 112), (85, 44), (31, 112), (91, 73), (80, 82), (135, 97), (10, 157), (77, 71), (133, 120), (79, 158), (116, 116), (26, 120), (162, 76), (19, 76), (90, 64), (89, 89), (153, 97), (134, 157), (46, 76), (154, 158), (119, 116), (82, 82), (148, 120), (106, 157), (70, 164), (151, 157), (30, 158), (8, 157), (65, 158), (17, 116), (123, 64), (92, 97), (16, 112), (29, 64), (138, 76), (74, 97), (1, 164), (64, 64), (22, 73), (24, 164), (55, 76), (68, 120), (73, 73), (72, 158), (20, 116), (158, 158), (118, 116), (140, 76), (147, 157), (101, 164), (15, 164), (87, 97), (163, 120), (63, 158), (66, 161), (32, 161), (117, 161), (95, 120), (57, 71), (61, 76), (78, 157), (18, 158), (4, 64), (88, 164), (53, 71), (115, 157), (48, 71), (62, 161), (144, 76), (100, 157), (40, 76), (38, 44), (97, 97), (160, 116), (109, 112), (141, 164), (126, 44), (99, 164), (111, 158), (132, 82), (121, 158), (27, 97), (96, 158), (110, 97), (114, 158), (139, 120), (33, 124), (37, 76), (128, 120), (142, 97), (159, 13), (42, 161), (59, 71), (164, 164), (131, 82), (58, 97), (161, 161), (11, 164), (137, 82), (120, 120), (150, 71), (165, 13), (104, 158), (5, 76), (143, 116), (166, 161), (155, 124), (146, 44), (12, 89), (51, 82), (86, 89), (41, 164), (152, 124), (23, 120), (7, 76), (157, 157), (36, 161), (35, 82), (107, 64), (9, 120), (75, 120), (149, 164), (125, 124), (43, 64), (98, 116), (69, 71), (54, 82), (21, 82), (14, 124), (45, 158), (56, 157), (127, 124), (44, 164), (76, 76), (102, 120), (3, 82), (124, 124), (113, 158), (129, 124), (25, 124), (136, 71), (94, 44), (103, 76), (156, 120), (84, 157), (145, 120), (2, 71), (6, 82), (49, 120), (81, 164), (105, 44), (39, 71), (122, 82)] current theta: 0.085754178881 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:39:12 2014 Optimize a model with 28057 rows, 28223 columns and 84001 nonzeros Presolve removed 27172 rows and 27337 columns Presolve time: 0.02s Presolved: 885 rows, 886 columns, 2332 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 886 integer (885 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1034 iterations, 0.01 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1034 simplex iterations) in 0.03 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.128631268322 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:39:12 2014 Optimize a model with 28057 rows, 28223 columns and 84001 nonzeros Presolve removed 26438 rows and 26540 columns Presolve time: 0.03s Presolved: 1619 rows, 1683 columns, 4585 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 1683 integer (1683 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 1879 iterations, 0.03 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (1879 simplex iterations) in 0.07 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.150069813042 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:39:12 2014 Optimize a model with 28057 rows, 28223 columns and 84001 nonzeros Presolve removed 26018 rows and 26065 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2039 rows, 2158 columns, 5900 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2158 integer (2158 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2490 iterations, 0.08 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2490 simplex iterations) in 0.12 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.160789085402 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:39:12 2014 Optimize a model with 28057 rows, 28223 columns and 84001 nonzeros Presolve removed 25836 rows and 25871 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2221 rows, 2352 columns, 6458 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2352 integer (2352 binary) Root relaxation: objective 2.131628e-14, 2116 iterations, 0.07 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3344 simplex iterations) in 0.14 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [6, 13, 41, 64, 69, 73, 80, 92, 93, 96, 104, 115, 116, 117, 124, 144, 163] edges [(13, 13), (60, 13), (36, 117), (146, 115), (50, 73), (150, 92), (166, 144), (130, 6), (56, 6), (107, 144), (67, 116), (132, 80), (149, 163), (151, 6), (63, 104), (113, 104), (15, 41), (141, 115), (76, 144), (46, 64), (116, 116), (1, 41), (158, 104), (59, 69), (86, 163), (131, 80), (135, 93), (138, 80), (93, 117), (115, 115), (11, 115), (47, 117), (37, 144), (157, 115), (29, 144), (161, 117), (137, 80), (31, 96), (51, 80), (119, 116), (44, 41), (94, 96), (83, 92), (27, 92), (22, 92), (35, 80), (58, 92), (17, 116), (7, 144), (105, 96), (110, 92), (123, 64), (34, 6), (66, 116), (108, 41), (69, 69), (54, 80), (30, 104), (73, 73), (112, 144), (3, 80), (21, 80), (9, 163), (20, 116), (42, 117), (118, 116), (101, 41), (156, 69), (92, 92), (162, 80), (87, 92), (136, 69), (10, 115), (121, 96), (70, 124), (89, 163), (4, 64), (104, 104), (84, 115), (55, 64), (163, 163), (85, 96), (164, 41), (68, 163), (8, 6), (103, 144), (39, 69), (2, 69), (6, 80), (111, 92), (134, 6), (147, 115), (12, 163), (140, 144), (128, 163), (122, 80), (23, 163), (160, 116), (139, 163), (28, 80), (96, 96), (100, 115), (71, 69), (91, 13), (80, 80), (18, 104), (41, 41), (52, 144), (97, 92), (109, 104), (77, 69), (16, 117), (33, 124), (126, 115), (159, 13), (45, 104), (40, 144), (61, 80), (74, 92), (106, 6), (165, 13), (98, 93), (95, 41), (143, 116), (90, 144), (38, 41), (155, 124), (81, 115), (19, 144), (78, 115), (64, 144), (82, 80), (152, 124), (154, 104), (133, 163), (117, 117), (5, 144), (125, 124), (43, 64), (120, 163), (102, 41), (14, 124), (114, 92), (127, 124), (79, 104), (124, 124), (144, 144), (129, 124), (62, 117), (142, 92), (145, 163), (65, 104), (49, 163), (25, 124), (99, 124), (26, 163), (148, 41), (88, 124), (57, 69), (0, 144), (48, 69), (72, 104), (53, 69), (153, 92), (24, 124), (75, 163), (32, 144)] current theta: 0.155429449222 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:39:13 2014 Optimize a model with 28057 rows, 28223 columns and 84001 nonzeros Presolve removed 25924 rows and 25964 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2133 rows, 2259 columns, 6189 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2259 integer (2259 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 2221 iterations, 0.07 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2221 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [5, 16, 56, 60, 64, 69, 73, 92, 93, 94, 99, 104, 116, 137, 141, 148, 163] edges [(125, 99), (100, 94), (129, 99), (50, 73), (123, 16), (150, 92), (16, 16), (105, 94), (11, 141), (149, 163), (91, 73), (63, 104), (113, 104), (46, 64), (102, 148), (116, 116), (131, 137), (165, 60), (70, 141), (158, 104), (59, 69), (86, 163), (8, 56), (135, 93), (107, 5), (28, 137), (67, 93), (103, 5), (51, 137), (95, 148), (126, 94), (60, 60), (112, 16), (99, 99), (127, 99), (19, 5), (6, 137), (119, 116), (10, 141), (83, 92), (34, 56), (22, 92), (40, 5), (140, 5), (152, 99), (32, 64), (58, 92), (1, 141), (108, 94), (17, 116), (21, 137), (110, 92), (115, 141), (29, 64), (114, 104), (44, 141), (64, 64), (69, 69), (30, 104), (138, 137), (73, 73), (9, 163), (20, 116), (93, 93), (156, 69), (92, 92), (130, 56), (87, 92), (136, 69), (13, 60), (49, 99), (89, 163), (146, 141), (4, 64), (104, 104), (55, 64), (163, 163), (157, 56), (159, 60), (68, 163), (88, 99), (134, 56), (39, 69), (2, 69), (111, 92), (12, 163), (147, 141), (24, 99), (82, 137), (23, 163), (160, 116), (144, 64), (139, 163), (71, 69), (78, 141), (18, 104), (97, 92), (109, 104), (148, 148), (77, 69), (76, 5), (41, 148), (124, 99), (80, 137), (35, 137), (45, 104), (61, 5), (128, 148), (14, 141), (74, 92), (161, 16), (98, 93), (143, 116), (42, 93), (33, 99), (54, 137), (137, 137), (154, 104), (132, 137), (133, 163), (5, 5), (66, 93), (15, 148), (43, 64), (52, 5), (85, 94), (118, 93), (121, 94), (96, 94), (7, 64), (37, 5), (79, 104), (90, 16), (155, 99), (166, 16), (3, 137), (25, 99), (164, 141), (62, 16), (106, 56), (142, 92), (145, 163), (65, 104), (31, 94), (26, 163), (36, 16), (141, 141), (84, 94), (81, 141), (0, 5), (57, 69), (120, 148), (101, 148), (117, 16), (48, 69), (151, 56), (47, 93), (72, 104), (122, 137), (53, 69), (94, 94), (153, 92), (27, 93), (38, 148), (75, 163), (162, 137), (56, 56)] current theta: 0.152749631132 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:39:13 2014 Optimize a model with 28057 rows, 28223 columns and 84001 nonzeros Presolve removed 25962 rows and 26002 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2095 rows, 2221 columns, 6075 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2221 integer (2221 binary) Root relaxation: objective 1.421085e-14, 2306 iterations, 0.08 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (3514 simplex iterations) in 0.15 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [5, 11, 16, 34, 50, 60, 64, 69, 87, 93, 94, 104, 116, 129, 137, 148, 163] edges [(100, 94), (147, 34), (123, 16), (16, 16), (50, 50), (105, 94), (67, 116), (22, 87), (149, 163), (63, 104), (113, 104), (46, 64), (102, 148), (116, 116), (131, 137), (165, 60), (158, 104), (59, 69), (86, 163), (135, 93), (153, 87), (38, 94), (107, 5), (28, 137), (117, 93), (134, 34), (103, 5), (51, 137), (95, 148), (126, 94), (60, 60), (112, 16), (91, 50), (19, 5), (92, 87), (6, 137), (119, 116), (40, 5), (140, 5), (14, 11), (24, 11), (108, 94), (17, 116), (141, 11), (21, 137), (56, 34), (29, 64), (114, 104), (64, 64), (74, 87), (69, 69), (30, 104), (138, 137), (9, 163), (20, 116), (93, 93), (11, 11), (156, 69), (155, 129), (78, 11), (124, 129), (109, 16), (151, 34), (136, 69), (129, 129), (13, 60), (25, 129), (89, 163), (83, 87), (4, 64), (104, 104), (55, 64), (163, 163), (106, 34), (159, 60), (84, 34), (68, 163), (39, 69), (2, 69), (12, 163), (82, 137), (128, 163), (23, 163), (160, 116), (144, 64), (139, 163), (81, 11), (71, 69), (18, 104), (142, 87), (148, 148), (77, 69), (76, 5), (41, 148), (80, 137), (35, 137), (45, 104), (34, 34), (61, 5), (111, 104), (33, 129), (164, 11), (161, 16), (8, 34), (98, 93), (87, 87), (143, 116), (42, 93), (54, 137), (137, 137), (73, 50), (154, 104), (132, 137), (133, 163), (130, 34), (146, 11), (5, 5), (66, 93), (15, 148), (43, 64), (52, 5), (85, 94), (118, 93), (127, 129), (150, 87), (32, 16), (121, 94), (10, 34), (157, 34), (96, 94), (7, 64), (37, 5), (79, 104), (90, 16), (166, 16), (3, 137), (97, 87), (1, 11), (152, 129), (62, 16), (145, 163), (65, 104), (31, 94), (49, 163), (26, 163), (36, 16), (0, 5), (57, 69), (120, 148), (101, 148), (48, 69), (58, 87), (115, 11), (47, 93), (72, 104), (125, 129), (88, 129), (122, 137), (53, 69), (94, 94), (110, 87), (70, 11), (99, 129), (27, 93), (75, 163), (162, 137), (44, 148)] current theta: 0.151409722087 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:39:13 2014 Optimize a model with 28057 rows, 28223 columns and 84001 nonzeros Presolve removed 25994 rows and 26038 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2063 rows, 2185 columns, 5975 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2185 integer (2185 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2580 iterations, 0.08 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2580 simplex iterations) in 0.12 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.152079676609 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:39:13 2014 Optimize a model with 28057 rows, 28223 columns and 84001 nonzeros Presolve removed 25976 rows and 26017 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2081 rows, 2206 columns, 6032 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2206 integer (2206 binary) Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 2471 iterations, 0.09 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time * 0 0 0 0.0000000 0.00000 0.00% - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2471 simplex iterations) in 0.13 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [5, 16, 30, 34, 41, 60, 64, 69, 73, 81, 87, 93, 96, 116, 124, 137, 163] edges [(70, 81), (50, 73), (16, 16), (154, 30), (22, 87), (149, 163), (91, 73), (15, 41), (46, 64), (116, 116), (131, 137), (165, 60), (38, 96), (59, 69), (86, 163), (135, 93), (153, 87), (107, 5), (28, 137), (117, 93), (134, 34), (67, 93), (103, 5), (51, 137), (60, 60), (1, 81), (112, 16), (158, 30), (31, 96), (19, 5), (120, 41), (92, 87), (6, 137), (119, 116), (94, 96), (144, 5), (40, 5), (140, 5), (14, 81), (17, 116), (21, 137), (56, 34), (105, 96), (123, 64), (141, 81), (29, 64), (64, 64), (58, 30), (74, 87), (69, 69), (138, 137), (73, 73), (11, 81), (9, 163), (20, 116), (93, 93), (101, 41), (156, 69), (151, 34), (136, 69), (13, 60), (121, 96), (111, 30), (89, 163), (83, 87), (30, 30), (4, 64), (55, 64), (163, 163), (106, 34), (159, 60), (85, 96), (164, 41), (68, 163), (39, 69), (2, 69), (12, 163), (82, 137), (72, 30), (128, 163), (23, 163), (160, 116), (139, 163), (96, 96), (71, 69), (63, 30), (81, 81), (78, 81), (104, 30), (142, 87), (41, 41), (18, 30), (77, 69), (33, 124), (76, 5), (80, 137), (84, 81), (35, 137), (45, 30), (34, 34), (61, 5), (147, 81), (161, 16), (8, 34), (98, 93), (95, 41), (87, 87), (100, 81), (143, 116), (42, 93), (155, 124), (54, 137), (108, 96), (113, 30), (137, 137), (152, 124), (114, 30), (109, 30), (132, 137), (126, 41), (133, 163), (130, 34), (79, 96), (5, 5), (66, 93), (125, 124), (43, 64), (52, 5), (146, 81), (118, 93), (150, 87), (102, 41), (32, 16), (127, 124), (10, 34), (157, 34), (7, 64), (37, 5), (44, 81), (124, 124), (90, 16), (166, 16), (3, 137), (97, 87), (62, 16), (129, 124), (145, 163), (49, 163), (25, 124), (99, 124), (26, 163), (36, 16), (115, 81), (148, 41), (88, 124), (0, 5), (57, 69), (48, 69), (47, 93), (122, 137), (53, 69), (110, 87), (24, 124), (65, 96), (27, 93), (75, 163), (162, 137)] current theta: 0.151744699348 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:39:14 2014 Optimize a model with 28057 rows, 28223 columns and 84001 nonzeros Presolve removed 25980 rows and 26021 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2077 rows, 2202 columns, 6020 nonzeros Loaded MIP start with objective 0 Variable types: 0 continuous, 2202 integer (2202 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 42 iterations, 0.00 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 0.00000 -1.00000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (42 simplex iterations) in 0.04 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 0.000000000000e+00, best bound 0.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0% infeasibility= 0.0 updated solution: facilities [5, 16, 30, 34, 41, 60, 64, 69, 73, 81, 87, 93, 96, 116, 124, 137, 163] edges [(70, 81), (50, 73), (16, 16), (154, 30), (22, 87), (149, 163), (91, 73), (15, 41), (46, 64), (116, 116), (131, 137), (165, 60), (38, 96), (59, 69), (86, 163), (135, 93), (153, 87), (107, 5), (28, 137), (117, 93), (134, 34), (67, 93), (103, 5), (51, 137), (60, 60), (1, 81), (112, 16), (158, 30), (31, 96), (19, 5), (120, 41), (92, 87), (6, 137), (119, 116), (94, 96), (144, 5), (40, 5), (140, 5), (14, 81), (17, 116), (21, 137), (56, 34), (105, 96), (123, 64), (141, 81), (29, 64), (64, 64), (58, 30), (74, 87), (69, 69), (138, 137), (73, 73), (11, 81), (9, 163), (20, 116), (93, 93), (101, 41), (156, 69), (151, 34), (136, 69), (13, 60), (121, 96), (111, 30), (89, 163), (83, 87), (30, 30), (4, 64), (55, 64), (163, 163), (106, 34), (159, 60), (85, 96), (164, 41), (68, 163), (39, 69), (2, 69), (12, 163), (82, 137), (72, 30), (128, 163), (23, 163), (160, 116), (139, 163), (96, 96), (71, 69), (63, 30), (81, 81), (78, 81), (104, 30), (142, 87), (41, 41), (18, 30), (77, 69), (33, 124), (76, 5), (80, 137), (84, 81), (35, 137), (45, 30), (34, 34), (61, 5), (147, 81), (161, 16), (8, 34), (98, 93), (95, 41), (87, 87), (100, 81), (143, 116), (42, 93), (155, 124), (54, 137), (108, 96), (113, 30), (137, 137), (152, 124), (114, 30), (109, 30), (132, 137), (126, 41), (133, 163), (130, 34), (79, 96), (5, 5), (66, 93), (125, 124), (43, 64), (52, 5), (146, 81), (118, 93), (150, 87), (102, 41), (32, 16), (127, 124), (10, 34), (157, 34), (7, 64), (37, 5), (44, 81), (124, 124), (90, 16), (166, 16), (3, 137), (97, 87), (62, 16), (129, 124), (145, 163), (49, 163), (25, 124), (99, 124), (26, 163), (36, 16), (115, 81), (148, 41), (88, 124), (0, 5), (57, 69), (48, 69), (47, 93), (122, 137), (53, 69), (110, 87), (24, 124), (65, 96), (27, 93), (75, 163), (162, 137)] current theta: 0.151577210717 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:39:14 2014 Optimize a model with 28057 rows, 28223 columns and 84001 nonzeros Presolve removed 25986 rows and 26030 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2071 rows, 2193 columns, 5999 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2193 integer (2193 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2413 iterations, 0.09 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2413 simplex iterations) in 0.13 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap - current theta: 0.151660955033 Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct 8 00:39:14 2014 Optimize a model with 28057 rows, 28223 columns and 84001 nonzeros Presolve removed 25986 rows and 26030 columns Presolve time: 0.04s Presolved: 2071 rows, 2193 columns, 5999 nonzeros MIP start did not produce a feasible solution Variable types: 0 continuous, 2193 integer (2193 binary) Root relaxation: cutoff, 2413 iterations, 0.09 seconds Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 cutoff 0 - 0.10000 - - 0s Explored 0 nodes (2413 simplex iterations) in 0.13 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Model objective exceeds cutoff Best objective -, best bound 1.000000000000e-01, gap -