Gurobi 5.0.1 (linux64) logging started Mon Feb 4 20:51:13 2013 Optimize a model with 818975 rows, 28900 columns and 2470950 nonzeros Presolve removed 21632 rows and 14501 columns (presolve time = 6s) ... Presolve removed 27182 rows and 14536 columns (presolve time = 10s) ... Presolve removed 27340 rows and 14536 columns Presolve time: 12.81s Presolved: 791635 rows, 14364 columns, 2387763 nonzeros Variable types: 77 continuous, 14287 integer (14287 binary) Found heuristic solution: objective 661088.00000 Root simplex log... Iteration Objective Primal Inf. Dual Inf. Time 6750 4.1664128e+05 0.000000e+00 4.574136e+08 5s 14850 4.1726943e+05 0.000000e+00 4.479643e+09 11s 21600 4.1824863e+05 0.000000e+00 5.887385e+08 16s 28350 4.1939657e+05 0.000000e+00 3.916842e+09 20s 35100 4.2093992e+05 0.000000e+00 3.868426e+09 25s 44550 4.2525853e+05 0.000000e+00 8.181202e+08 30s 55350 4.2808885e+05 0.000000e+00 5.607110e+08 36s 66150 4.3239059e+05 0.000000e+00 5.784327e+08 40s 78329 4.3934040e+05 0.000000e+00 1.124347e+09 45s 89129 4.4437995e+05 0.000000e+00 8.413424e+08 50s 102629 4.5009776e+05 0.000000e+00 1.153852e+08 55s 112079 4.5425578e+05 0.000000e+00 1.546660e+08 60s 124229 4.5930298e+05 0.000000e+00 1.161604e+08 65s 137729 4.6562950e+05 0.000000e+00 4.691530e+07 70s 151229 4.7296580e+05 0.000000e+00 1.588156e+08 75s 163379 4.7850722e+05 0.000000e+00 4.124498e+08 80s 174179 4.8342375e+05 0.000000e+00 1.560022e+08 85s 184979 4.8799766e+05 0.000000e+00 7.864942e+07 90s 195779 4.9270266e+05 0.000000e+00 1.791109e+07 95s 206579 4.9790050e+05 0.000000e+00 8.862253e+06 101s 208000 4.9870830e+05 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 103s 208000 4.9870830e+05 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 103s Root relaxation: objective 4.987083e+05, 208000 iterations, 103.08 seconds Total elapsed time = 120.03s Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time 0 0 498708.300 0 19 661088.000 498708.300 24.6% - 121s H 0 0 498718.00000 498708.300 0.00% - 122s Explored 0 nodes (208530 simplex iterations) in 122.39 seconds Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors) Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04) Best objective 4.987180000000e+05, best bound 4.987090000000e+05, gap 0.0018%