Gurobi 5.0.1 (linux64) logging started Wed Apr 24 01:48:22 2013

Optimize a model with 704 rows, 41024 columns and 81984 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.06s
Presolved: 704 rows, 41024 columns, 81984 nonzeros
Variable types: 40960 continuous, 64 integer (64 binary)

Root relaxation: objective 8.040874e+04, 1927 iterations, 0.05 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0 80408.7413    0    5          - 80408.7413     -      -    0s
H    0     0                    82919.000000 80408.7413  3.03%     -    0s
H    0     0                    81480.000000 80408.7413  1.31%     -    0s
H    0     0                    80917.000000 80408.7413  0.63%     -    0s
     0     0 80467.1313    0    3 80917.0000 80467.1313  0.56%     -    0s
     0     0 80472.4913    0    2 80917.0000 80472.4913  0.55%     -    0s
     0     0 80472.4913    0    5 80917.0000 80472.4913  0.55%     -    0s
     0     0 80472.4913    0    3 80917.0000 80472.4913  0.55%     -    0s
     0     0 80472.4913    0    2 80917.0000 80472.4913  0.55%     -    0s
     0     0 80472.4913    0    2 80917.0000 80472.4913  0.55%     -    0s
     0     0 80472.4913    0    2 80917.0000 80472.4913  0.55%     -    0s
     0     0 80472.4913    0    2 80917.0000 80472.4913  0.55%     -    0s
     0     0 80472.4913    0    2 80917.0000 80472.4913  0.55%     -    0s
     0     2 80489.4134    0    2 80917.0000 80489.4134  0.53%     -    0s
H    6     4                    80839.000000 80552.0811  0.35%  35.0    1s
H   10     6                    80795.000000 80552.0811  0.30%  26.6    1s
*   11     5              10    80634.000000 80552.0811  0.10%  26.4    1s
*   13     3              11    80601.000000 80552.0811  0.06%  23.3    1s
*   15     3               6    80576.000000 80562.4483  0.02%  25.6    1s

Cutting planes:
  Implied bound: 33
  Flow cover: 2

Explored 19 nodes (4157 simplex iterations) in 1.20 seconds
Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 8.057600000000e+04, best bound 8.057600000000e+04, gap 0.0%