Gurobi 5.0.1 (linux64) logging started Wed Apr 24 05:25:37 2013

Optimize a model with 968 rows, 77528 columns and 154968 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.13s
Presolved: 968 rows, 77528 columns, 154968 nonzeros
Variable types: 77440 continuous, 88 integer (88 binary)

Root relaxation: objective 1.052435e+05, 2671 iterations, 0.10 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0 105243.509    0    6          - 105243.509     -      -    0s
H    0     0                    109597.00000 105243.509  3.97%     -    0s
H    0     0                    106646.00000 105243.509  1.32%     -    0s
     0     0 105464.232    0    5 106646.000 105464.232  1.11%     -    0s
     0     0 105488.373    0    5 106646.000 105488.373  1.09%     -    0s
     0     0 105488.373    0    6 106646.000 105488.373  1.09%     -    1s
     0     0 105488.373    0    5 106646.000 105488.373  1.09%     -    1s
     0     0 105489.217    0    5 106646.000 105489.217  1.08%     -    1s
     0     0 105493.063    0    5 106646.000 105493.063  1.08%     -    1s
     0     0 105499.615    0    6 106646.000 105499.615  1.07%     -    1s
     0     0 105500.212    0    5 106646.000 105500.212  1.07%     -    2s
     0     0 105500.212    0    5 106646.000 105500.212  1.07%     -    2s
     0     0 105500.212    0    5 106646.000 105500.212  1.07%     -    2s
     0     0 105500.212    0    5 106646.000 105500.212  1.07%     -    2s
     0     2 105505.526    0    5 106646.000 105505.526  1.07%     -    2s
H    2     2                    106156.40164 105561.229  0.56%  47.5    2s
H    4     3                    106005.00000 105585.189  0.40%  57.0    3s
H    5     4                    105874.00000 105585.189  0.27%  49.0    3s
*    9     7               8    105717.00000 105585.189  0.12%  57.4    3s

Cutting planes:
  Implied bound: 109
  Flow cover: 13

Explored 14 nodes (6566 simplex iterations) in 3.25 seconds
Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 1.057170000000e+05, best bound 1.057137757516e+05, gap 0.0030%