Gurobi 5.0.1 (linux64) logging started Wed Apr 24 04:28:39 2013

Optimize a model with 71568 rows, 70728 columns and 282408 nonzeros
Presolve removed 84 rows and 0 columns
Presolve time: 0.33s
Presolved: 71484 rows, 70728 columns, 282324 nonzeros
Variable types: 70644 continuous, 84 integer (84 binary)

Root simplex log...

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
    7809    6.6872469e+04   7.408026e+04   0.000000e+00      5s
    8488    6.6973557e+04   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      7s

Root relaxation: objective 6.697356e+04, 8488 iterations, 6.66 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0 66973.5574    0   56          - 66973.5574     -      -    7s
H    0     0                    112169.00000 66973.5574  40.3%     -   10s
H    0     0                    93552.000000 66973.5574  28.4%     -   35s
     0     0 80335.0071    0   18 93552.0000 80335.0071  14.1%     -   48s
     0     0 86319.3015    0    9 93552.0000 86319.3015  7.73%     -   53s
H    0     0                    93184.000000 86319.3015  7.37%     -   53s
     0     0 87160.9117    0    4 93184.0000 87160.9117  6.46%     -   55s
     0     0 87751.1436    0    5 93184.0000 87751.1436  5.83%     -   56s
     0     0 87818.8676    0    4 93184.0000 87818.8676  5.76%     -   56s
H    0     0                    92779.135167 87818.8676  5.35%     -   56s
H    0     0                    92272.000000 87818.8676  4.83%     -   56s
H    0     0                    88514.000000 87818.8676  0.79%     -   56s
     0     2 87821.4389    0    4 88514.0000 87821.4389  0.78%     -   58s
     4     5 88198.9302    3    1 88514.0000 88115.1777  0.45%   567   60s
H    6     3                    88188.000000 88115.1777  0.08%   414   60s
*    7     2               5    88154.000000 88115.1777  0.04%   364   60s

Cutting planes:
  Implied bound: 78

Explored 10 nodes (22495 simplex iterations) in 60.31 seconds
Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 8.815400000000e+04, best bound 8.815400000000e+04, gap 0.0%