Gurobi 5.0.1 (linux64) logging started Fri Nov 16 05:36:25 2012

Optimize a model with 9844 rows, 3080 columns and 32338 nonzeros
Presolve removed 2 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.21s
Presolved: 9842 rows, 3078 columns, 31980 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 3078 integer (3078 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 55.0000000

Root relaxation: objective 2.000000e+00, 2223 iterations, 0.07 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0    2.00000    0  110   55.00000    2.00000  96.4%     -    0s
H    0     0                      50.0000000    2.00000  96.0%     -    0s
H    0     0                       5.0000000    2.00000  60.0%     -    0s
     0     0    2.66667    0  200    5.00000    2.66667  46.7%     -    1s
     0     0    2.67516    0 2709    5.00000    2.67516  46.5%     -    1s
     0     0    2.67516    0 2716    5.00000    2.67516  46.5%     -    2s
     0     0    2.67516    0 2407    5.00000    2.67516  46.5%     -    4s
     0     0    2.67516    0 2426    5.00000    2.67516  46.5%     -    5s
     0     0    2.67516    0 2369    5.00000    2.67516  46.5%     -    7s
     0     0    2.67516    0 2402    5.00000    2.67516  46.5%     -    8s
     0     0    2.67516    0 2255    5.00000    2.67516  46.5%     -   10s
     0     0    2.67516    0 2392    5.00000    2.67516  46.5%     -   11s
     0     0    2.67516    0 2338    5.00000    2.67516  46.5%     -   12s
     0     0    2.67516    0 2371    5.00000    2.67516  46.5%     -   14s
     0     0    2.67516    0 2370    5.00000    2.67516  46.5%     -   14s
     0     2    3.00000    0 2370    5.00000    3.00000  40.0%     -   18s
     2     4    4.00000    2  124    5.00000    3.00000  40.0%  3713   20s
*   15     4              14       4.0000000    3.00000  25.0%   582   20s

Cutting planes:
  Clique: 105
  Zero half: 13

Explored 24 nodes (54986 simplex iterations) in 20.28 seconds
Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 4.000000000000e+00, best bound 4.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0%