Gurobi 5.0.1 (linux64) logging started Sun Nov 18 05:54:52 2012

Optimize a model with 367 rows, 371 columns and 1286 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 23 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 367 rows, 348 columns, 1263 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 348 integer (347 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 68.0000000

Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 211 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0    0.00000    0  156   68.00000    0.00000   100%     -    0s
H    0     0                      56.0000000    0.00000   100%     -    0s
H    0     0                      54.0000000    0.00000   100%     -    0s
H    0     0                      51.0000000    0.00000   100%     -    0s
     0     0    0.37499    0  158   51.00000    0.37499  99.3%     -    0s
H    0     0                      50.0000000    0.37499  99.3%     -    0s
H    0     0                      43.0000000    0.37499  99.1%     -    0s
     0     0    0.83069    0  162   43.00000    0.83069  98.1%     -    0s
H    0     0                      40.0000000    0.83069  97.9%     -    0s
     0     0    0.83069    0  162   40.00000    0.83069  97.9%     -    0s
     0     0    0.83069    0  162   40.00000    0.83069  97.9%     -    0s
H    0     0                      31.0000000    0.83069  97.3%     -    0s
H    0     0                      26.0000000    0.83069  96.8%     -    0s
H    0     0                      20.0000000    0.83069  95.8%     -    0s
     0     2    0.83106    0  161   20.00000    0.83106  95.8%     -    0s
H   27    23                      10.0000000    1.00000  90.0%  22.0    0s
*   35    15              24       9.0000000    1.00000  88.9%  21.4    0s
*   68    22              11       8.0000000    1.00000  87.5%  23.6    0s

Cutting planes:
  Gomory: 3
  Mod-K: 3

Explored 164 nodes (4572 simplex iterations) in 0.21 seconds
Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 8.000000000000e+00, best bound 8.000000000000e+00, gap 0.0%