Gurobi 5.0.1 (linux64) logging started Sun Nov 18 03:48:33 2012

Optimize a model with 315 rows, 239 columns and 1024 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 315 rows, 239 columns, 1024 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 239 integer (239 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 67.0000000

Root relaxation: objective 0.000000e+00, 130 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0    0.00000    0   81   67.00000    0.00000   100%     -    0s
H    0     0                      60.0000000    0.00000   100%     -    0s
     0     0    0.73725    0   84   60.00000    0.73725  98.8%     -    0s
     0     0    0.75088    0   85   60.00000    0.75088  98.7%     -    0s
     0     0    0.76240    0   89   60.00000    0.76240  98.7%     -    0s
H    0     0                      50.0000000    0.76240  98.5%     -    0s
     0     0    0.77546    0   89   50.00000    0.77546  98.4%     -    0s
     0     0    0.79945    0   98   50.00000    0.79945  98.4%     -    0s
     0     0    0.80179    0   98   50.00000    0.80179  98.4%     -    0s
     0     2    0.81612    0   98   50.00000    0.81612  98.4%     -    0s
H   32    32                      45.0000000    3.05633  93.2%  29.5    0s
H   32    32                      41.0000000    3.05633  92.5%  29.5    0s
*   36    36              20      35.0000000    3.05633  91.3%  29.0    0s
*   72    58              23      34.0000000    3.06190  91.0%  23.8    0s
*  100    70              16      33.0000000    7.21311  78.1%  23.3    0s
*  106    70              17      32.0000000    7.21311  77.5%  22.5    0s
*  145    91              16      30.0000000    7.21739  75.9%  21.7    0s
*  466   192              14      29.0000000   13.21053  54.4%  19.0    0s
*  755   249              30      28.0000000   15.17143  45.8%  22.3    0s

Explored 2074 nodes (48188 simplex iterations) in 1.60 seconds
Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.800000000000e+01, best bound 2.800000000000e+01, gap 0.0%