Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Wed Oct  8 01:26:58 2014

Optimize a model with 33489 rows, 33307 columns and 132678 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.93s
Presolved: 33489 rows, 33307 columns, 132678 nonzeros
Variable types: 1 continuous, 33306 integer (33306 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 1.1955812
Found heuristic solution: objective 1.0436224
Found heuristic solution: objective 0.9046381

Root relaxation: objective 9.050225e-02, 8450 iterations, 2.55 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0    0.09050    0 1690    0.90464    0.09050  90.0%     -    4s
H    0     0                       0.2080968    0.09050  56.5%     -    4s
     0     0    0.09105    0 1628    0.20810    0.09105  56.2%     -    7s
     0     0    0.09105    0 1657    0.20810    0.09105  56.2%     -    8s
     0     0    0.09220    0 1673    0.20810    0.09220  55.7%     -    9s
     0     0    0.09263    0 1667    0.20810    0.09263  55.5%     -    9s
     0     0    0.09270    0 1673    0.20810    0.09270  55.5%     -    9s
H    0     0                       0.2075095    0.09270  55.3%     -    9s
     0     0    0.09277    0 1669    0.20751    0.09277  55.3%     -   10s
     0     0    0.09277    0 1670    0.20751    0.09277  55.3%     -   10s
     0     0    0.09277    0 1631    0.20751    0.09277  55.3%     -   10s
H    0     0                       0.1893087    0.09277  51.0%     -   12s
     0     2    0.09277    0 1622    0.18931    0.09277  51.0%     -   12s
    17    19    0.09673    9 1605    0.18931    0.09414  50.3%   767   15s
H   81    81                       0.1749904    0.09414  46.2%   544   19s
    82    84    0.16886   44  271    0.17499    0.09414  46.2%   554   20s
*   98    96              54       0.1737942    0.09414  45.8%   513   20s
H  108    94                       0.1707004    0.09452  44.6%   477   20s
H  135   121                       0.1697739    0.09452  44.3%   439   21s
H  162   144                       0.1622400    0.09452  41.7%   412   22s
H  189   159                       0.1578478    0.09453  40.1%   385   23s
H  216   186                       0.1577713    0.09453  40.1%   362   24s
*  224   182              28       0.1564910    0.09453  39.6%   352   24s
*  226   182              29       0.1563043    0.09453  39.5%   350   24s
*  227   181              29       0.1562400    0.09453  39.5%   349   24s
H  243   191                       0.1533660    0.09455  38.3%   342   24s
   244   194    0.12687   13  661    0.15337    0.09455  38.3%   344   25s
*  260   206              19       0.1531029    0.09455  38.2%   335   25s
*  265   203              19       0.1526180    0.09455  38.0%   330   25s
*  281   201              25       0.1509181    0.09455  37.3%   314   25s
*  289   206               6       0.1507620    0.09462  37.2%   321   25s
*  291   206               8       0.1505561    0.09462  37.2%   320   25s
*  293   206               9       0.1505421    0.09462  37.1%   318   25s
*  294   203               9       0.1467224    0.09462  35.5%   317   25s
H  307   187                       0.1459760    0.09571  34.4%   348   28s
*  311   189              11       0.1458370    0.09593  34.2%   355   28s
   324   180    0.14496    9  336    0.14584    0.09666  33.7%   399   30s
*  350   169               6       0.1443665    0.09799  32.1%   430   32s
*  353   168               8       0.1432685    0.09799  31.6%   427   32s
*  361   171               8       0.1430204    0.09865  31.0%   427   33s
*  362   170               8       0.1426928    0.09865  30.9%   426   33s
*  367   167              10       0.1405511    0.09865  29.8%   421   33s
   387   147 infeasible   24         0.14055    0.10305  26.7%   434   35s
   470    64     cutoff   38         0.14055    0.11635  17.2%   445   40s

Cutting planes:
  Gomory: 5
  MIR: 9
  Zero half: 1

Explored 537 nodes (242318 simplex iterations) in 40.74 seconds
Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 1.405510604352e-01, best bound 1.405510604352e-01, gap 0.0%