Gurobi 5.6.3 (linux64) logging started Tue Oct 7 20:50:41 2014
Optimize a model with 12247 rows, 6163 columns and 30420 nonzeros
Presolve removed 78 rows and 0 columns
Presolve time: 0.14s
Presolved: 12169 rows, 6163 columns, 30342 nonzeros
Variable types: 1 continuous, 6162 integer (6162 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 0.9232494
Found heuristic solution: objective 0.9163269
Found heuristic solution: objective 0.8443476
Root relaxation: objective 4.819130e-03, 7739 iterations, 0.77 seconds
Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work
Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time
0 0 0.00482 0 5296 0.84435 0.00482 99.4% - 1s
H 0 0 0.3691874 0.00482 98.7% - 2s
H 0 0 0.3596950 0.00482 98.7% - 2s
0 0 0.01137 0 1627 0.35969 0.01137 96.8% - 3s
0 0 0.02491 0 1140 0.35969 0.02491 93.1% - 4s
H 0 0 0.3584748 0.02491 93.1% - 4s
0 0 0.02544 0 1133 0.35847 0.02544 92.9% - 4s
0 0 0.02863 0 1122 0.35847 0.02863 92.0% - 4s
0 0 0.02912 0 1116 0.35847 0.02912 91.9% - 4s
0 0 0.02961 0 1096 0.35847 0.02961 91.7% - 4s
0 0 0.02989 0 1089 0.35847 0.02989 91.7% - 4s
0 0 0.02989 0 1083 0.35847 0.02989 91.7% - 5s
H 0 0 0.3577415 0.02989 91.6% - 5s
0 0 0.03013 0 1062 0.35774 0.03013 91.6% - 5s
H 0 0 0.3341701 0.03013 91.0% - 5s
H 0 0 0.3332187 0.03013 91.0% - 5s
0 0 0.03331 0 945 0.33322 0.03331 90.0% - 5s
0 0 0.03340 0 945 0.33322 0.03340 90.0% - 5s
0 0 0.03340 0 946 0.33322 0.03340 90.0% - 5s
0 0 0.03340 0 915 0.33322 0.03340 90.0% - 5s
H 0 0 0.3120733 0.03340 89.3% - 6s
H 0 0 0.2817992 0.03340 88.1% - 6s
0 2 0.04926 0 608 0.28180 0.04926 82.5% - 6s
H 54 54 0.2804865 0.06248 77.7% 167 7s
H 81 77 0.2608742 0.06248 76.0% 142 7s
H 108 77 0.2459777 0.07388 70.0% 130 7s
H 135 87 0.2362654 0.07513 68.2% 121 7s
* 143 85 15 0.2336841 0.07644 67.3% 117 7s
* 146 76 14 0.2314876 0.07644 67.0% 115 7s
* 153 75 15 0.2310859 0.09287 59.8% 116 7s
* 156 71 17 0.2290376 0.09287 59.5% 114 7s
Cutting planes:
Gomory: 16
Implied bound: 8
MIR: 236
Explored 228 nodes (54930 simplex iterations) in 8.19 seconds
Thread count was 1 (of 16 available processors)
Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.290375636725e-01, best bound 2.290375636725e-01, gap 0.0%